Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yang Xiao, Wenbin Shuai, Zhuang Zhang, Limin Liu, Yueming Song, Xi Yang
{"title":"Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Yang Xiao, Wenbin Shuai, Zhuang Zhang, Limin Liu, Yueming Song, Xi Yang","doi":"10.1111/os.14350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pear-shaped disc could increase the risk of intraoperative end-plate injury, which may lead to postoperative sclerotic Modic Changes (MCs). However, there are no studies on the relationship between pear-shaped disc and postoperative sclerotic MCs. Therefore, this study investigates the risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specifically, the study focuses on the impact of pear-shaped disc on the occurrence of postoperative sclerotic MCs and evaluates its influence on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 411 patients undergoing TLIF between January 2018 and January 2022 were included. Among them, 50 developed postoperative sclerotic MCs, while 361 did not. The two groups were matched based on various parameters. Clinical and radiographic evaluations, including visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar X-ray, CT, and MRI, were performed. Statistical analysis included independent sample t test, Pearson's chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After pairing, a total of 100 patients were included, including 50 patients in postoperative sclerotic MCs group and 50 patients in non-MCs group. There were 27 pear-shaped discs in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group, significantly higher than 7 in the non-MCs group (p < 0.001). Besides, BMI, endplate injury, and cage subsidence in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in the non-MCs group, but the fusion rate was significantly lower than that in the non-MCs group. The postoperative and follow-up SL and surgical corrections of SL in postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in non-MCs group. The independent risk factors identified for postoperative sclerotic MCs include pear-shaped disc and higher BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pear-shaped disc and higher body mass index (BMI) as independent risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs. Patients with sclerotic MCs exhibited a lower fusion rate, increased cage subsidence, and poorer symptom improvement compared to those without MCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pear-shaped disc could increase the risk of intraoperative end-plate injury, which may lead to postoperative sclerotic Modic Changes (MCs). However, there are no studies on the relationship between pear-shaped disc and postoperative sclerotic MCs. Therefore, this study investigates the risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specifically, the study focuses on the impact of pear-shaped disc on the occurrence of postoperative sclerotic MCs and evaluates its influence on clinical outcomes.

Methods: A total of 411 patients undergoing TLIF between January 2018 and January 2022 were included. Among them, 50 developed postoperative sclerotic MCs, while 361 did not. The two groups were matched based on various parameters. Clinical and radiographic evaluations, including visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar X-ray, CT, and MRI, were performed. Statistical analysis included independent sample t test, Pearson's chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results: After pairing, a total of 100 patients were included, including 50 patients in postoperative sclerotic MCs group and 50 patients in non-MCs group. There were 27 pear-shaped discs in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group, significantly higher than 7 in the non-MCs group (p < 0.001). Besides, BMI, endplate injury, and cage subsidence in the postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in the non-MCs group, but the fusion rate was significantly lower than that in the non-MCs group. The postoperative and follow-up SL and surgical corrections of SL in postoperative sclerotic MCs group were significantly higher than those in non-MCs group. The independent risk factors identified for postoperative sclerotic MCs include pear-shaped disc and higher BMI.

Conclusion: Pear-shaped disc and higher body mass index (BMI) as independent risk factors for postoperative sclerotic MCs. Patients with sclerotic MCs exhibited a lower fusion rate, increased cage subsidence, and poorer symptom improvement compared to those without MCs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信