Effectiveness and safety of talimogene laherparepvec and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Melanoma Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1097/CMR.0000000000001010
Yu-Chun Shen, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Khanh Dinh Hoang, Hsian-Jenn Wang, Chiehfeng Chen
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of talimogene laherparepvec and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yu-Chun Shen, Ya-Li Huang, Yi-No Kang, Wen-Kuan Chiu, Khanh Dinh Hoang, Hsian-Jenn Wang, Chiehfeng Chen","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Melanoma is an aggressive tumor that is challenging to treat. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the first oncolytic virus treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat unresectable melanoma, was recently used in recurrent tumors after initial surgery. Our network meta-analysis aimed to compare T-VEC treatment of metastatic melanoma with treatment of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and control group. The protocol for this network meta-analysis was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363321). Three databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched until 10 June 2024. The search terms used were a combination of 'metastatic melanoma', 'melanoma', 'T-VEC', 'talimogene laherparepvec', and 'GM-CSF'. Seven studies, with 978 participants receiving T-VEC treatment, 649 participants receiving GM-CSF treatment, and 938 participants constituting the control group, were included in our meta-analysis. For 1-year overall survival (OS), the league table revealed significant differences between the control and T-VEC groups [0.90 (0.83, 0.99)]. The disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 years was also analyzed showing no difference between the groups in DFS in the league table. T-VEC may be a favorable treatment for metastatic melanoma owing to the notable increase in OS. Nevertheless, due to the side effects and limitations, the clinical benefits of T-VEC therapy in metastatic melanoma should be interpreted cautiously. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that T-VEC may be a favorable choice of treatment for metastatic melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Melanoma is an aggressive tumor that is challenging to treat. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), the first oncolytic virus treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat unresectable melanoma, was recently used in recurrent tumors after initial surgery. Our network meta-analysis aimed to compare T-VEC treatment of metastatic melanoma with treatment of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and control group. The protocol for this network meta-analysis was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363321). Three databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, were searched until 10 June 2024. The search terms used were a combination of 'metastatic melanoma', 'melanoma', 'T-VEC', 'talimogene laherparepvec', and 'GM-CSF'. Seven studies, with 978 participants receiving T-VEC treatment, 649 participants receiving GM-CSF treatment, and 938 participants constituting the control group, were included in our meta-analysis. For 1-year overall survival (OS), the league table revealed significant differences between the control and T-VEC groups [0.90 (0.83, 0.99)]. The disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 years was also analyzed showing no difference between the groups in DFS in the league table. T-VEC may be a favorable treatment for metastatic melanoma owing to the notable increase in OS. Nevertheless, due to the side effects and limitations, the clinical benefits of T-VEC therapy in metastatic melanoma should be interpreted cautiously. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that T-VEC may be a favorable choice of treatment for metastatic melanoma.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Melanoma Research
Melanoma Research 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. ​Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信