Physical Activity and Dexamethasone for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sriram Yennurajalingam, Vicente Valero, Brandon G Smalgo, Michael J Overman, Aravind Dasari, Robert A Wolff, Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Carlos H Barcenas, Naifa L Busaidy, Bryan Fellman, Karen Basen-Engquist, Kenneth R Hess, Debasish Tripathy, Eduardo Bruera
{"title":"Physical Activity and Dexamethasone for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Preliminary Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.","authors":"Sriram Yennurajalingam, Vicente Valero, Brandon G Smalgo, Michael J Overman, Aravind Dasari, Robert A Wolff, Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav, Carlos H Barcenas, Naifa L Busaidy, Bryan Fellman, Karen Basen-Engquist, Kenneth R Hess, Debasish Tripathy, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) and dexamethasone (Dex) when used independently have modest benefits for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with advanced cancer. In this study we aimed to determine the feasibility (adherence, safety, and satisfaction) of combining PA with Dex versus PA with placebo (PBO) for CRF, and to explore the effects of PA+Dex and PA+PBO on CRF.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this phase II, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, eligible patients had advanced cancer and a CRF score of ≥4 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for fatigue (0-10 scale). Patients were randomized to standardized PA for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of Dex (PA+Dex arm) or PBO (PA+PBO arm) twice daily for the first 7 days. Changes in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores from baseline to days 8 and 29 were assessed. Other outcomes included change in quality-of-life scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 (89%) patients were evaluable. Adherence rates for study medication, resistance exercise, and aerobic exercise were 91% and 92% (P=.15), 83% and 70.6% (P=.35), and 82.9% and 78.3% (P=.73), respectively, in the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms. The satisfaction rates for the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms were 98% and 79%, respectively. Median (IQR) changes in FACIT-F scores at days 8 and 29 from baseline were 9 (2 to 16; P<.001) and 5.75 (0 to 12.5; P=.015) for the PA+Dex arm, respectively, and 3.5 (-2.1 to 10; P=.054) and 6.5 (2.5 to 15.5; P=.006) for the PA+PBO arm, respectively. We found a significant treatment effect in the PA+Dex arm using exploratory linear mixed model analysis, with treatment showing an improvement of 5.63 units for FACIT-F scores (95% CI, 1.74-9.52; P=.005). We found significant improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS-Fatigue SF-7a), and Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) totals on days 8 and 29 in the PA+Dex arm. There was no significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events between the arms (P=.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that the use of combination PA+Dex and PA+PBO for CRF was feasible and associated with high rates of satisfaction, adherence to medication and PA intervention, and tolerability. CRF improvement with PA+Dex was clinically significant at days 8 and 29. Further larger studies are justified.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: NCT03583255.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) and dexamethasone (Dex) when used independently have modest benefits for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with advanced cancer. In this study we aimed to determine the feasibility (adherence, safety, and satisfaction) of combining PA with Dex versus PA with placebo (PBO) for CRF, and to explore the effects of PA+Dex and PA+PBO on CRF.

Patients and methods: In this phase II, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, eligible patients had advanced cancer and a CRF score of ≥4 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for fatigue (0-10 scale). Patients were randomized to standardized PA for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of Dex (PA+Dex arm) or PBO (PA+PBO arm) twice daily for the first 7 days. Changes in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores from baseline to days 8 and 29 were assessed. Other outcomes included change in quality-of-life scores.

Results: A total of 64 (89%) patients were evaluable. Adherence rates for study medication, resistance exercise, and aerobic exercise were 91% and 92% (P=.15), 83% and 70.6% (P=.35), and 82.9% and 78.3% (P=.73), respectively, in the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms. The satisfaction rates for the PA+Dex and PA+PBO arms were 98% and 79%, respectively. Median (IQR) changes in FACIT-F scores at days 8 and 29 from baseline were 9 (2 to 16; P<.001) and 5.75 (0 to 12.5; P=.015) for the PA+Dex arm, respectively, and 3.5 (-2.1 to 10; P=.054) and 6.5 (2.5 to 15.5; P=.006) for the PA+PBO arm, respectively. We found a significant treatment effect in the PA+Dex arm using exploratory linear mixed model analysis, with treatment showing an improvement of 5.63 units for FACIT-F scores (95% CI, 1.74-9.52; P=.005). We found significant improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS-Fatigue SF-7a), and Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) totals on days 8 and 29 in the PA+Dex arm. There was no significant difference in grade ≥3 adverse events between the arms (P=.36).

Conclusions: Our study found that the use of combination PA+Dex and PA+PBO for CRF was feasible and associated with high rates of satisfaction, adherence to medication and PA intervention, and tolerability. CRF improvement with PA+Dex was clinically significant at days 8 and 29. Further larger studies are justified.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT03583255.

身体活动和地塞米松治疗癌症相关疲劳:一项初步安慰剂对照、随机、双盲试验。
背景:单独使用体力活动(PA)和地塞米松(Dex)对晚期癌症患者的癌症相关疲劳(CRF)有一定的益处。在本研究中,我们旨在确定PA联合Dex与PA联合安慰剂(PBO)治疗CRF的可行性(依从性、安全性和满意度),并探讨PA+Dex和PA+PBO对CRF的影响。患者和方法:在这项II期随机、双盲对照试验中,符合条件的患者为晚期癌症患者,在埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)中疲劳的CRF评分≥4(0-10分)。患者随机接受标准化PA治疗4周,前7天每天两次使用4mg右美托咪定(PA+右美托咪定组)或PBO (PA+PBO组)。评估慢性疾病治疗-疲劳功能评估(FACIT-F)评分从基线到第8天和第29天的变化。其他结果包括生活质量得分的变化。结果:64例(89%)患者可评估。在PA+Dex组和PA+PBO组中,研究用药、阻力运动和有氧运动的依从率分别为91%和92% (P= 0.15), 83%和70.6% (P= 0.35), 82.9%和78.3% (P= 0.73)。PA+Dex和PA+PBO组的满意率分别为98%和79%。FACIT-F评分在第8天和第29天较基线的中位(IQR)变化为9(2至16;结论:我们的研究发现,使用PA+Dex和PA+PBO联合治疗CRF是可行的,并且与高满意度、药物依从性和PA干预以及耐受性相关。PA+Dex在第8天和第29天的CRF改善具有临床意义。进一步更大规模的研究是合理的。临床试验:gov标识符:NCT03583255。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信