Preparing Surrogates for Decision-Making: Development and Pilot Testing of Prepare for Their Care.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lingsheng Li, Brookelle H Li, Clarissa Ferguson, Jana Powell, Aiesha M Volow, Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson, Heather A Harris, Anne Kinderman, Patricia Levenberg, Judy Long, Alexander Smith, Alexia M Torke, Deborah E Barnes, Rebecca L Sudore
{"title":"Preparing Surrogates for Decision-Making: Development and Pilot Testing of Prepare for Their Care.","authors":"Lingsheng Li, Brookelle H Li, Clarissa Ferguson, Jana Powell, Aiesha M Volow, Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson, Heather A Harris, Anne Kinderman, Patricia Levenberg, Judy Long, Alexander Smith, Alexia M Torke, Deborah E Barnes, Rebecca L Sudore","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Surrogate decision-makers have expressed the need for better preparation around communication and medical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This mixed-methods feasibility study aimed to assess the feasibility and usability of an online program to prepare surrogates for their role.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 2-part program for surrogates called PREPARE For THEIR Care with a diverse group of Community Advisory Board members and caregivers recruited from the National Patient Advocacy Foundation. We conducted pilot testing of the program with caregivers. Using validated surveys, we assessed the feasibility and usability of the program and measured pre-to-post Advance Care Planning (ACP) Engagement among caregiver participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 26 pilot participants, mean age was 52 ± 12.7 years; 27% were men, 4% were nonbinary, 27% identified as Asian, 27% Black, 11% Multi-Racial, and 35% White. Participants found the program to be informative, comprehensive, and easy to use. Ease-of-use was rated 9.6 ± 0.92 on a 10-point scale; and, on 5-point scales, comfort using the program was rated 4.8 ± 0.51, helpfulness 4.6 ± 0.65, and likelihood to recommend to others 4.7 ± 0.53. There was improvement comparing pre- and postsurveys in readiness to engage in ACP for others (4.23 ± 0.67) to 4.47 ± 0.73), P = 0.04) and for self (3.55 ± 1.36) to (3.89 ± 1.06), P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pilot study, the prepare for their care program resulted in high user satisfaction and improved pre-to-post surrogate readiness to engage in ACP. Larger trials are needed to evaluate the impact of the program on surrogate readiness and confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Surrogate decision-makers have expressed the need for better preparation around communication and medical decision-making.

Objectives: This mixed-methods feasibility study aimed to assess the feasibility and usability of an online program to prepare surrogates for their role.

Methods: We developed a 2-part program for surrogates called PREPARE For THEIR Care with a diverse group of Community Advisory Board members and caregivers recruited from the National Patient Advocacy Foundation. We conducted pilot testing of the program with caregivers. Using validated surveys, we assessed the feasibility and usability of the program and measured pre-to-post Advance Care Planning (ACP) Engagement among caregiver participants.

Results: Of the 26 pilot participants, mean age was 52 ± 12.7 years; 27% were men, 4% were nonbinary, 27% identified as Asian, 27% Black, 11% Multi-Racial, and 35% White. Participants found the program to be informative, comprehensive, and easy to use. Ease-of-use was rated 9.6 ± 0.92 on a 10-point scale; and, on 5-point scales, comfort using the program was rated 4.8 ± 0.51, helpfulness 4.6 ± 0.65, and likelihood to recommend to others 4.7 ± 0.53. There was improvement comparing pre- and postsurveys in readiness to engage in ACP for others (4.23 ± 0.67) to 4.47 ± 0.73), P = 0.04) and for self (3.55 ± 1.36) to (3.89 ± 1.06), P = 0.02).

Conclusion: In this pilot study, the prepare for their care program resulted in high user satisfaction and improved pre-to-post surrogate readiness to engage in ACP. Larger trials are needed to evaluate the impact of the program on surrogate readiness and confidence.

为决策准备代孕:为他们的护理准备的发展和试点测试。
背景:代理决策者已经表示需要在沟通和医疗决策方面做好更好的准备。目的:这个混合方法的可行性研究旨在评估一个在线程序的可行性和可用性,为他们的角色准备代孕。方法:我们为代孕母亲制定了一个名为“为她们的护理做好准备”的两部分计划,该计划由来自全国患者倡导基金会的社区咨询委员会成员和护理人员组成。我们对护理人员进行了试点测试。通过有效的调查,我们评估了该计划的可行性和可用性,并测量了护理参与者在事前到事后的提前护理计划(ACP)参与情况。结果:26例受试者平均年龄52±12.7岁;其中27%为男性,4%为非二元,27%为亚洲人,27%为黑人,11%为多种族,35%为白人。参与者发现该计划内容丰富,全面,易于使用。易用性评分为9.6±0.92(满分10分);在5分制量表中,使用该程序的舒适度为4.8±0.51,乐于助人性为4.6±0.65,向他人推荐的可能性为4.7±0.53。与调查前和调查后比较,为他人(4.23(±0.67)至4.47(±0.73),p=0.04)和为自己(3.55(±1.36)至3.89(±1.06),p=0.02)准备参与ACP的情况有所改善。结论:在这项试点研究中,“为他们的护理做准备”项目获得了很高的用户满意度,并提高了代理患者参与ACP的事前至事后准备程度。需要更大规模的试验来评估该计划对替代准备和信心的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信