The effects of physician stigma and hesitancy with opioids on patient pain care in the United States: A survey study.

Q3 Medicine
David W Boorman, Priyanka H Nair, Samuel B John, Joel Zivot, Sudheer Potru
{"title":"The effects of physician stigma and hesitancy with opioids on patient pain care in the United States: A survey study.","authors":"David W Boorman, Priyanka H Nair, Samuel B John, Joel Zivot, Sudheer Potru","doi":"10.5055/jom.0872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine if physician stigma toward patients with chronic pain or opioid use disorder or physician hesitancy prescribing opioids adversely affects patient pain care. Explore the demographics associated with stigma and hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey, 25 questions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Physician faculty at medical schools (80 percent), private physician Facebook® groups (15 percent), and others (5 percent), all specialties.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>N = 352 attending United States physicians.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Physician self-reported patient pain care quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjectively worse patient pain care was not found to be associated with stigma but had a borderline association with hesitancy (p = 0.046). Subjectively worse pain care was associated with less knowledge and experience with opioids (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 3.0-5.6), practicing in the Midwest region (OR 2.1, 95 percent CI 1.2-3.4), and specialty: emergency (OR 53, 95 percent CI 20-139), other internal (OR 15, 95 percent CI 6.6-34), and general medicine (OR 12, 95 percent CI 5.4-26) compared to pain medicine. Physician stigma was more likely to be high in males (OR 2.5, 95 percent CI 1.5-4.3) and medium in physicians over 55 (OR 2.5, 95 percent CI 1.5-4.5). Compared to medium stigma, those with low stigma (General Linear Model (GLM) 0.35, 95 percent CI 0.18-0.52) and high stigma (GLM 0.22, 95 percent CI 0.01-0.44) were both more hesitant to prescribe opioids. More hesitancy was associated with less knowledge and experience (GLM 0.14, 95 percent CI 0.05-0.22) and physicians under 55 (GLM 0.24, 95 percent CI 0.08-0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although physician stigma was not found to affect patient pain care adversely, self-reporting bias and/or questionnaire issues may account for this. Physician specialty and knowledge and experience with opioids were important factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"20 6","pages":"449-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determine if physician stigma toward patients with chronic pain or opioid use disorder or physician hesitancy prescribing opioids adversely affects patient pain care. Explore the demographics associated with stigma and hesitancy.

Design: Survey, 25 questions.

Setting: Physician faculty at medical schools (80 percent), private physician Facebook® groups (15 percent), and others (5 percent), all specialties.

Participants: N = 352 attending United States physicians.

Main outcome measure: Physician self-reported patient pain care quality.

Results: Subjectively worse patient pain care was not found to be associated with stigma but had a borderline association with hesitancy (p = 0.046). Subjectively worse pain care was associated with less knowledge and experience with opioids (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 3.0-5.6), practicing in the Midwest region (OR 2.1, 95 percent CI 1.2-3.4), and specialty: emergency (OR 53, 95 percent CI 20-139), other internal (OR 15, 95 percent CI 6.6-34), and general medicine (OR 12, 95 percent CI 5.4-26) compared to pain medicine. Physician stigma was more likely to be high in males (OR 2.5, 95 percent CI 1.5-4.3) and medium in physicians over 55 (OR 2.5, 95 percent CI 1.5-4.5). Compared to medium stigma, those with low stigma (General Linear Model (GLM) 0.35, 95 percent CI 0.18-0.52) and high stigma (GLM 0.22, 95 percent CI 0.01-0.44) were both more hesitant to prescribe opioids. More hesitancy was associated with less knowledge and experience (GLM 0.14, 95 percent CI 0.05-0.22) and physicians under 55 (GLM 0.24, 95 percent CI 0.08-0.40).

Conclusions: Although physician stigma was not found to affect patient pain care adversely, self-reporting bias and/or questionnaire issues may account for this. Physician specialty and knowledge and experience with opioids were important factors.

医生耻辱感和阿片类药物对美国患者疼痛护理的影响:一项调查研究。
目的:确定医生对慢性疼痛或阿片类药物使用障碍患者的耻辱感或医生开阿片类药物处方的犹豫是否会对患者疼痛护理产生不利影响。探索与耻辱和犹豫相关的人口统计数据。设计:调查,25个问题。环境:医学院的医师教师(80%),私人医生Facebook®群组(15%)和其他(5%),所有专业。参与者:352名美国主治医生。主要结局指标:医师自述患者疼痛护理质量。结果:主观上较差的患者疼痛护理与耻辱感不相关,但与犹豫有边缘相关性(p = 0.046)。主观上,较差的疼痛护理与较少的阿片类药物知识和经验相关(优势比[OR] 4.1, 95%可信区间[CI] 3.0-5.6),在中西部地区执业(OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.4),专科:与疼痛药物相比,急诊(OR 53, 95% CI 20-139),其他内科(OR 15, 95% CI 6.6-34)和普通医学(OR 12, 95% CI 5.4-26)。男性医生耻辱感较高(OR为2.5,95%可信区间1.5-4.3),55岁以上的医生耻辱感中等(OR为2.5,95%可信区间1.5-4.5)。与中等柱头相比,低柱头(一般线性模型(GLM) 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.52)和高柱头(GLM 0.22, 95% CI 0.01-0.44)的患者在开阿片类药物处方时都更犹豫。更多的犹豫与更少的知识和经验(GLM 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.22)和55岁以下的医生(GLM 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.40)相关。结论:虽然医生耻辱感没有发现对患者疼痛护理有不利影响,但自我报告偏差和/或问卷问题可能解释了这一点。医生专业和阿片类药物的知识和经验是重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信