Implementation of a Checklist Tool to Improve Understanding of Rapid Response Team Protocols.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Maria C Pliakas, Erin F Carlton, Sarah Brennan, Diane Brown, Laura Getchell, Debra O'Neal, Kayla B Phelps, Rebekah Shaw, Courtney Strohacker, Anisha K Coughlin
{"title":"Implementation of a Checklist Tool to Improve Understanding of Rapid Response Team Protocols.","authors":"Maria C Pliakas, Erin F Carlton, Sarah Brennan, Diane Brown, Laura Getchell, Debra O'Neal, Kayla B Phelps, Rebekah Shaw, Courtney Strohacker, Anisha K Coughlin","doi":"10.1177/08850666241309860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Rapid response teams (RRT) are multidisciplinary teams activated to assess patients outside of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and require a shared framework for approaching a deteriorating patient. In this project, we aimed to improve the understanding of RRT protocols through the development and implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist. <b>Methods:</b> This quality improvement project took place from 2019 to 2022. A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a current state analysis and defined the ideal RRT process. To improve the RRT process, we developed and implemented an RRT Huddle Checklist based on the SBAR framework, standardized education, and created a process for regular feedback. The primary aim was to improve understanding of RRT protocols among participants. RRT duration was used as a balancing measure. <b>Results:</b> A total of 301 stakeholders completed surveys, including 127 nurses, 101 residents, 45 RRT nurses, 10 Hospital Medicine faculty and fellows, and 18 PICU fellows. After implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist, the proportion of respondents who agreed with knowing RRT protocols increased from 69% in 2020 to 75% in 2022, with no increase in RRT duration. <b>Conclusions:</b> The implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist resulted in an increased proportion of key stakeholders that understood RRT protocols without increasing the duration of RRTs. The RRT Huddle Checklist tool utilizes a widely known, validated framework that can be adapted at other institutions to standardize the RRT process and promote ongoing just-in-time education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241309860"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241309860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Rapid response teams (RRT) are multidisciplinary teams activated to assess patients outside of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and require a shared framework for approaching a deteriorating patient. In this project, we aimed to improve the understanding of RRT protocols through the development and implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist. Methods: This quality improvement project took place from 2019 to 2022. A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a current state analysis and defined the ideal RRT process. To improve the RRT process, we developed and implemented an RRT Huddle Checklist based on the SBAR framework, standardized education, and created a process for regular feedback. The primary aim was to improve understanding of RRT protocols among participants. RRT duration was used as a balancing measure. Results: A total of 301 stakeholders completed surveys, including 127 nurses, 101 residents, 45 RRT nurses, 10 Hospital Medicine faculty and fellows, and 18 PICU fellows. After implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist, the proportion of respondents who agreed with knowing RRT protocols increased from 69% in 2020 to 75% in 2022, with no increase in RRT duration. Conclusions: The implementation of the RRT Huddle Checklist resulted in an increased proportion of key stakeholders that understood RRT protocols without increasing the duration of RRTs. The RRT Huddle Checklist tool utilizes a widely known, validated framework that can be adapted at other institutions to standardize the RRT process and promote ongoing just-in-time education.

实施清单工具以提高对快速反应小组协议的理解。
背景和目的:快速反应小组(RRT)是多学科小组,用于评估重症监护室(ICU)以外的患者,需要一个共同的框架来接近病情恶化的患者。在这个项目中,我们的目标是通过开发和实现RRT Huddle Checklist来提高对RRT协议的理解。方法:本质量改进项目于2019 - 2022年进行。一个多学科工作组进行了当前状态分析,并定义了理想的RRT过程。为了改进RRT过程,我们开发并实施了基于SBAR框架的RRT分组清单,标准化教育,并创建了一个定期反馈的过程。主要目的是提高参与者对RRT协议的理解。RRT持续时间作为一种平衡度量。结果:共301名利益相关者完成问卷调查,其中护士127名,住院医师101名,RRT护士45名,医院医学系及研究员10名,PICU研究员18名。实施RRT Huddle Checklist后,同意了解RRT协议的受访者比例从2020年的69%增加到2022年的75%,而RRT持续时间没有增加。结论:RRT分组检查表的实施增加了理解RRT协议的关键利益相关者的比例,但没有增加RRT的持续时间。RRT Huddle Checklist工具利用了一个广为人知的、经过验证的框架,可以在其他机构中进行调整,以标准化RRT过程并促进正在进行的及时教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信