On Medical Tourism Overseas: Ethical Analysis of the Duties of NHS Doctors in Managing the Negative Health Consequences of Accessing Medical Treatments Abroad

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richard C. Armitage
{"title":"On Medical Tourism Overseas: Ethical Analysis of the Duties of NHS Doctors in Managing the Negative Health Consequences of Accessing Medical Treatments Abroad","authors":"Richard C. Armitage","doi":"10.1111/jep.14300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>An increasing number of UK residents are travelling overseas to access medical treatments, the negative health consequences of which are largely managed by NHS doctors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This paper performs an ethical analysis, using the ethical framework of principlism, of the duties of NHS doctors in managing these negative health consequences of medical tourism overseas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>While the doctor's duty to respect patient autonomy contains a negative duty to not interfere with their choice to access medical treatment overseas, it also contains a positive duty to ensure this choice is informed. This requires those considering medical tourism overseas to be counselled on the risks. This should take place directly by counselling, and indirectly through public health messaging. Beneficence requires the doctor to promote the patient's health, therefore obligating them to treat complications of medical tourism overseas, to intervene if poor cosmetic outcomes negatively impact the patient's mental health, and to refer the patient if the necessary aftercare is insufficiently or entirely unavailable on the NHS. Beneficence also requires doctors to remove harm, meaning they must counsel patients about the risks of medical tourism overseas to minimise the risk of negative health consequences. Justice requires NHS doctors to care for patients according to their clinical needs regardless of how that need has arisen, including the negative health consequences of medical tourism abroad, and requires NHS doctors to minimise these negative health consequences to minimise the scarce resources allocated to addressing them. The duty of non-maleficence is not relevant in this context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Amongst other requirements, this paper finds that NHS doctors must counsel those considering medical tourism overseas on the risks of doing so, and existing efforts to do so should be increased to reflect the increasing prevalence of medical tourism overseas by UK residents and the associated negative health consequences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

An increasing number of UK residents are travelling overseas to access medical treatments, the negative health consequences of which are largely managed by NHS doctors.

Methods

This paper performs an ethical analysis, using the ethical framework of principlism, of the duties of NHS doctors in managing these negative health consequences of medical tourism overseas.

Findings

While the doctor's duty to respect patient autonomy contains a negative duty to not interfere with their choice to access medical treatment overseas, it also contains a positive duty to ensure this choice is informed. This requires those considering medical tourism overseas to be counselled on the risks. This should take place directly by counselling, and indirectly through public health messaging. Beneficence requires the doctor to promote the patient's health, therefore obligating them to treat complications of medical tourism overseas, to intervene if poor cosmetic outcomes negatively impact the patient's mental health, and to refer the patient if the necessary aftercare is insufficiently or entirely unavailable on the NHS. Beneficence also requires doctors to remove harm, meaning they must counsel patients about the risks of medical tourism overseas to minimise the risk of negative health consequences. Justice requires NHS doctors to care for patients according to their clinical needs regardless of how that need has arisen, including the negative health consequences of medical tourism abroad, and requires NHS doctors to minimise these negative health consequences to minimise the scarce resources allocated to addressing them. The duty of non-maleficence is not relevant in this context.

Conclusion

Amongst other requirements, this paper finds that NHS doctors must counsel those considering medical tourism overseas on the risks of doing so, and existing efforts to do so should be increased to reflect the increasing prevalence of medical tourism overseas by UK residents and the associated negative health consequences.

论海外医疗旅游:NHS医生在处理海外就医负面健康后果中的责任的伦理分析。
简介:越来越多的英国居民前往海外接受医疗治疗,其负面健康后果主要由NHS医生管理。方法:本文执行的伦理分析,使用原则的伦理框架,在管理这些医疗旅游海外的负面健康后果的NHS医生的职责。研究结果:医生尊重病人自主权的义务包括不干涉病人选择到海外接受治疗的消极义务,同时也包括确保病人知情的积极义务。这就要求对那些考虑到海外医疗旅游的人进行风险咨询。这应通过咨询直接进行,并通过公共卫生信息间接进行。慈善要求医生促进病人的健康,因此他们有义务治疗海外医疗旅游的并发症,如果不良的美容结果对病人的精神健康产生负面影响,就进行干预,如果必要的善后护理不足或完全无法获得国民保健制度,就转诊病人。慈善还要求医生消除伤害,这意味着他们必须就海外医疗旅游的风险向患者提供咨询,以尽量减少对健康造成负面影响的风险。正义要求国民保健制度的医生根据病人的临床需要照顾病人,不管这种需要是如何产生的,包括国外医疗旅游的负面健康后果,并要求国民保健制度的医生尽量减少这些负面健康后果,尽量减少分配给解决这些问题的稀缺资源。在这种情况下,无恶意义务是不相关的。结论:除其他要求外,本文发现NHS医生必须咨询那些考虑海外医疗旅游的风险,现有的努力应该增加,以反映英国居民海外医疗旅游的日益流行和相关的负面健康后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信