Assessing Theoretical Considerations of Effects Within a Behavioural Obesity Treatment in Women: Implications for Medical Professional Referral

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
James J. Annesi
{"title":"Assessing Theoretical Considerations of Effects Within a Behavioural Obesity Treatment in Women: Implications for Medical Professional Referral","authors":"James J. Annesi","doi":"10.1111/jep.14267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Obesity is an increasing medical issue not responding well to behavioural treatments beyond their initial weeks/months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Before suggesting surgical or pharmacological interventions, medical professionals might consider referrals to cost-effective, community-based behavioural treatments if stronger theoretical/empirical bases were demonstrated. Thus, evaluation of such is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Women with obesity were randomly assigned to 6-month treatments emphasizing either behavioural theory-based methods focused on exercise-associated psychological changes generalizing to dietary changes (<i>n</i> = 101), or typical instruction in weight-control methods (<i>n</i> = 53). Theory-driven psychosocial, behavioural and weight changes were assessed over 12 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Improvements in all measured variables were significantly greater in the behavioural theory group. In the evaluation of hypothesized theory-based relationships–which have overarching bases in social cognitive theory–(1) self-efficacy theory was supported by self-regulation-associated increases in self-efficacy predicting later positive changes in exercise and the diet; (2) coaction theory was reinforced by the identified transfer of changes in self-regulation of exercise to self-regulation of eating; (3) the mood-behaviour model was sustained by improved mood predicting exercise and dietary improvements through (mediated by) self-regulation changes; (4) self-regulation theory was bolstered through early improvements in self-regulation supporting its longer-term increase, especially under conditions of self-regulatory skills practice and (5) operant conditioning theory was supported through results indicating a reinforcing effect from exercise-associated mood improvement to reduced emotional eating. Across the theories, relationships among tested variables were generally stronger in the behavioural theory group. Improvements in exercise and dietary behaviours were significant independent predictors of reduced weight.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings support the addressed behavioural theories within a community-based obesity treatment model that emphasized exercise for its psychosocial impacts on dietary behaviours and sustained weight loss. Based on the present empirical supports, medical professionals should consider referral to such approaches before (or in combination with) surgical or pharmacological methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Obesity is an increasing medical issue not responding well to behavioural treatments beyond their initial weeks/months.

Aims and Objectives

Before suggesting surgical or pharmacological interventions, medical professionals might consider referrals to cost-effective, community-based behavioural treatments if stronger theoretical/empirical bases were demonstrated. Thus, evaluation of such is warranted.

Method

Women with obesity were randomly assigned to 6-month treatments emphasizing either behavioural theory-based methods focused on exercise-associated psychological changes generalizing to dietary changes (n = 101), or typical instruction in weight-control methods (n = 53). Theory-driven psychosocial, behavioural and weight changes were assessed over 12 months.

Results

Improvements in all measured variables were significantly greater in the behavioural theory group. In the evaluation of hypothesized theory-based relationships–which have overarching bases in social cognitive theory–(1) self-efficacy theory was supported by self-regulation-associated increases in self-efficacy predicting later positive changes in exercise and the diet; (2) coaction theory was reinforced by the identified transfer of changes in self-regulation of exercise to self-regulation of eating; (3) the mood-behaviour model was sustained by improved mood predicting exercise and dietary improvements through (mediated by) self-regulation changes; (4) self-regulation theory was bolstered through early improvements in self-regulation supporting its longer-term increase, especially under conditions of self-regulatory skills practice and (5) operant conditioning theory was supported through results indicating a reinforcing effect from exercise-associated mood improvement to reduced emotional eating. Across the theories, relationships among tested variables were generally stronger in the behavioural theory group. Improvements in exercise and dietary behaviours were significant independent predictors of reduced weight.

Conclusion

Findings support the addressed behavioural theories within a community-based obesity treatment model that emphasized exercise for its psychosocial impacts on dietary behaviours and sustained weight loss. Based on the present empirical supports, medical professionals should consider referral to such approaches before (or in combination with) surgical or pharmacological methods.

评估女性行为肥胖治疗效果的理论考虑:对医疗专业转诊的影响。
理由:肥胖是一个日益严重的医学问题,行为治疗在最初几周/几个月后效果不佳。目的和目标:在建议手术或药物干预措施之前,如果有更有力的理论/经验基础,医疗专业人员可能会考虑转诊到具有成本效益的、基于社区的行为治疗。因此,有必要对此进行评价。方法:肥胖女性被随机分配到6个月的治疗中,其中一组强调基于行为理论的方法,侧重于运动相关的心理变化,并推广到饮食改变(n = 101),另一组强调体重控制方法的典型指导(n = 53)。在12个月的时间里,对理论驱动的心理、行为和体重变化进行了评估。结果:行为理论组在所有测量变量上的改善都明显更大。在对基于理论的假设关系的评估中——它在社会认知理论中有着重要的基础——(1)自我效能感的自我调节相关的增加预测了后来运动和饮食的积极变化,这支持了自我效能感理论;(2)运动自我调节的变化向饮食自我调节的转变强化了协同作用理论;(3)情绪-行为模型是通过自我调节变化介导的情绪改善预测运动和饮食改善来维持的;(4)自我调节的早期改善支持了其长期增长,特别是在自我调节技能练习的条件下;(5)操作性条件反射理论得到了锻炼相关情绪改善和情绪性进食减少的强化效应的支持。在所有理论中,被测试变量之间的关系通常在行为理论组中更强。运动和饮食行为的改善是体重减轻的重要独立预测因素。结论:研究结果支持了基于社区的肥胖治疗模型中的行为理论,该模型强调运动对饮食行为和持续减肥的心理社会影响。基于目前的经验支持,医疗专业人员应考虑在手术或药物治疗方法之前(或与之结合)采用此类方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信