{"title":"What is a Good Outcome of an Inpatient Perinatal Mental Health Admission? Developing an Innovative Evaluation Plan for a New Unit","authors":"Sophie Isobel, Alison Green, Sylvia Lim-Gibson","doi":"10.1111/jep.14269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Developing a feasible and sensitive evaluation strategy for a new mental health service is a challenge that requires consideration of what a service is trying to achieve and what a ‘good’ outcome might look like. Perinatal mental illnesses are complex in their causes and treatment. Mother Baby Units provide specialist perinatal mental health care to parents experiencing mental illness in the perinatal period, with evaluations demonstrating clinical and social outcomes. There has however been remarkably little research on <i>how</i> MBUs achieve these outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This paper outlines the process and components of designing an evaluation plan for a new perinatal mental health unit, summarising outcome measures considered and the methodology of the evaluation strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A meaningful realist approach was designed. This innovative dualistic methodology is intended to develop theories of what might cause change while also considering what components of interventions parents experience as meaningful.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Articulating the approach to evaluation provides a contribution to evaluation knowledge for others evaluating complex public health interventions. The relational nature of perinatal mental health experiences challenges individualistic approaches to care delivery, funding and evaluation. As part of service establishment, there is a need to consider what a ‘good’ outcome of care might be and to develop evaluation approaches that capture the relational components of recovery as well as the factors that support families to sustain change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11713845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale
Developing a feasible and sensitive evaluation strategy for a new mental health service is a challenge that requires consideration of what a service is trying to achieve and what a ‘good’ outcome might look like. Perinatal mental illnesses are complex in their causes and treatment. Mother Baby Units provide specialist perinatal mental health care to parents experiencing mental illness in the perinatal period, with evaluations demonstrating clinical and social outcomes. There has however been remarkably little research on how MBUs achieve these outcomes.
Method
This paper outlines the process and components of designing an evaluation plan for a new perinatal mental health unit, summarising outcome measures considered and the methodology of the evaluation strategy.
Results
A meaningful realist approach was designed. This innovative dualistic methodology is intended to develop theories of what might cause change while also considering what components of interventions parents experience as meaningful.
Conclusion
Articulating the approach to evaluation provides a contribution to evaluation knowledge for others evaluating complex public health interventions. The relational nature of perinatal mental health experiences challenges individualistic approaches to care delivery, funding and evaluation. As part of service establishment, there is a need to consider what a ‘good’ outcome of care might be and to develop evaluation approaches that capture the relational components of recovery as well as the factors that support families to sustain change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.