What is a Good Outcome of an Inpatient Perinatal Mental Health Admission? Developing an Innovative Evaluation Plan for a New Unit

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sophie Isobel, Alison Green, Sylvia Lim-Gibson
{"title":"What is a Good Outcome of an Inpatient Perinatal Mental Health Admission? Developing an Innovative Evaluation Plan for a New Unit","authors":"Sophie Isobel,&nbsp;Alison Green,&nbsp;Sylvia Lim-Gibson","doi":"10.1111/jep.14269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Developing a feasible and sensitive evaluation strategy for a new mental health service is a challenge that requires consideration of what a service is trying to achieve and what a ‘good’ outcome might look like. Perinatal mental illnesses are complex in their causes and treatment. Mother Baby Units provide specialist perinatal mental health care to parents experiencing mental illness in the perinatal period, with evaluations demonstrating clinical and social outcomes. There has however been remarkably little research on <i>how</i> MBUs achieve these outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This paper outlines the process and components of designing an evaluation plan for a new perinatal mental health unit, summarising outcome measures considered and the methodology of the evaluation strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A meaningful realist approach was designed. This innovative dualistic methodology is intended to develop theories of what might cause change while also considering what components of interventions parents experience as meaningful.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Articulating the approach to evaluation provides a contribution to evaluation knowledge for others evaluating complex public health interventions. The relational nature of perinatal mental health experiences challenges individualistic approaches to care delivery, funding and evaluation. As part of service establishment, there is a need to consider what a ‘good’ outcome of care might be and to develop evaluation approaches that capture the relational components of recovery as well as the factors that support families to sustain change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11713845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Developing a feasible and sensitive evaluation strategy for a new mental health service is a challenge that requires consideration of what a service is trying to achieve and what a ‘good’ outcome might look like. Perinatal mental illnesses are complex in their causes and treatment. Mother Baby Units provide specialist perinatal mental health care to parents experiencing mental illness in the perinatal period, with evaluations demonstrating clinical and social outcomes. There has however been remarkably little research on how MBUs achieve these outcomes.

Method

This paper outlines the process and components of designing an evaluation plan for a new perinatal mental health unit, summarising outcome measures considered and the methodology of the evaluation strategy.

Results

A meaningful realist approach was designed. This innovative dualistic methodology is intended to develop theories of what might cause change while also considering what components of interventions parents experience as meaningful.

Conclusion

Articulating the approach to evaluation provides a contribution to evaluation knowledge for others evaluating complex public health interventions. The relational nature of perinatal mental health experiences challenges individualistic approaches to care delivery, funding and evaluation. As part of service establishment, there is a need to consider what a ‘good’ outcome of care might be and to develop evaluation approaches that capture the relational components of recovery as well as the factors that support families to sustain change.

Abstract Image

什么是围产期心理健康住院的好结果?为新单位制定创新评估计划。
理由:为一项新的精神卫生服务制定一项可行和敏感的评估策略是一项挑战,需要考虑一项服务正在努力实现的目标和“好”的结果可能是什么样子。围产期精神疾病的病因和治疗都很复杂。母婴科向在围产期患有精神疾病的父母提供专业的围产期心理保健,并进行临床和社会结果评估。然而,关于mbu如何实现这些结果的研究却非常少。方法:本文概述了为新的围产期精神卫生单位设计评估计划的过程和组成部分,总结了所考虑的结果措施和评估战略的方法。结果:设计了有意义的现实主义方法。这种创新的二元论方法旨在发展可能导致变化的理论,同时也考虑到父母认为有意义的干预措施的哪些组成部分。结论:阐明评价方法有助于其他人评价复杂的公共卫生干预措施。围产期心理健康经历的关系性质对护理提供、资助和评估的个人主义方法提出了挑战。作为服务机构的一部分,有必要考虑护理的“好”结果可能是什么,并制定评估方法,以捕捉康复的关系组成部分以及支持家庭维持变化的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信