Current Real-World Status of Off-Label Under- and Over-Dose of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tabito Kino, Akihiko Nogami, Kyoko Soejima, Kikuya Uno, Koichiro Kumagai, Takashi Kurita, Masayuki Fukuzawa, Atsushi Takita, Tomoko Ishizu, Kazutaka Aonuma
{"title":"Current Real-World Status of Off-Label Under- and Over-Dose of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.","authors":"Tabito Kino, Akihiko Nogami, Kyoko Soejima, Kikuya Uno, Koichiro Kumagai, Takashi Kurita, Masayuki Fukuzawa, Atsushi Takita, Tomoko Ishizu, Kazutaka Aonuma","doi":"10.1111/jce.16560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Off-label under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify efficacy and safety of off-label DOACs dose after AF ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RYOUMA registry was a prospective multicenter study of Japanese patients who underwent AF ablation between 2017 and 2018. DOAC prescriptions were categorized into on-label standard dose, on-label reduced dose, off-label underdose, and off-label overdose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of off-label doses among patients after AF ablation varied depending on the type of DOAC, ranging from 13.5% to 34.9%. Of 2821 patients, 366 (13.0%) were prescribed an off-label underdose and exhibited significantly higher CHADS<sub>2</sub>, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA, HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>, and HAS-BLED scores, age, concomitant use of antiplatelets, and lower weight when compared to the on-label standard dose (n = 1809). While the incidence of ischemic stroke after 1 year of off-label underdose was notably low (0.28%), the rate of major bleeding was relatively high (1.7%). Off-label overdose was prescribed to 134 patients (4.8%), who showed a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding (3.0%) compared to on-label standard dose (0.91%; p = 0.02). The off-label overdose group did not have any particular background and its thromboembolic risk was, conversely, low. The most likely cause of off-label overdose was clinicians potentially overlooking dose criteria, including advanced age, low body weight, and low creatinine clearance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients after AF ablation, off-label DOAC overdose was infrequent, but significantly associated with higher incidence of major bleeding during the remote period after AF ablation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered as UMIN000026092 (University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry).</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Off-label under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon in real-world practice.

Objective: This study aimed to identify efficacy and safety of off-label DOACs dose after AF ablation.

Methods: The RYOUMA registry was a prospective multicenter study of Japanese patients who underwent AF ablation between 2017 and 2018. DOAC prescriptions were categorized into on-label standard dose, on-label reduced dose, off-label underdose, and off-label overdose.

Results: The proportion of off-label doses among patients after AF ablation varied depending on the type of DOAC, ranging from 13.5% to 34.9%. Of 2821 patients, 366 (13.0%) were prescribed an off-label underdose and exhibited significantly higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, CHA2DS2-VA, HELT-E2S2, and HAS-BLED scores, age, concomitant use of antiplatelets, and lower weight when compared to the on-label standard dose (n = 1809). While the incidence of ischemic stroke after 1 year of off-label underdose was notably low (0.28%), the rate of major bleeding was relatively high (1.7%). Off-label overdose was prescribed to 134 patients (4.8%), who showed a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding (3.0%) compared to on-label standard dose (0.91%; p = 0.02). The off-label overdose group did not have any particular background and its thromboembolic risk was, conversely, low. The most likely cause of off-label overdose was clinicians potentially overlooking dose criteria, including advanced age, low body weight, and low creatinine clearance.

Conclusions: In patients after AF ablation, off-label DOAC overdose was infrequent, but significantly associated with higher incidence of major bleeding during the remote period after AF ablation.

Trial registration: The study was registered as UMIN000026092 (University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry).

心房颤动消融后直接口服抗凝药物超说明书剂量不足和过量的现状。
背景:心房颤动(AF)患者直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的超说明书用药不足和过量在现实生活中并不罕见。目的:本研究旨在确定房颤消融后超说明书DOACs剂量的有效性和安全性。RYOUMA注册是一项前瞻性多中心研究,研究对象是2017年至2018年间接受房颤消融的日本患者。DOAC处方分为标签上的标准剂量、标签上的减少剂量、标签外的不足剂量和标签外的过量剂量。结果:房颤消融后患者超说明书剂量的比例因DOAC类型的不同而不同,范围为13.5% ~ 34.9%。在2821例患者中,366例(13.0%)患者的处方剂量低于标签,与标签标准剂量相比,CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc、CHA2DS2-VA、HELT-E2S2和ha - bled评分、年龄、同时使用抗血小板药物和体重较低(n = 1809)。超说明书剂量不足1年后缺血性脑卒中发生率明显较低(0.28%),大出血发生率相对较高(1.7%)。134例(4.8%)患者服用超说明书用药过量,其大出血发生率(3.0%)明显高于超说明书标准剂量(0.91%;p = 0.02)。标签外用药过量组没有任何特殊的背景,相反,其血栓栓塞风险较低。超说明书用药过量最可能的原因是临床医生可能忽略了剂量标准,包括高龄、低体重和低肌酐清除率。结论:在房颤消融后患者中,超说明书DOAC过量的情况并不多见,但与房颤消融后较长时期大出血的发生率显著相关。试验注册:研究注册号为UMIN000026092(大学医院医学信息网-临床试验注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信