Brief Report: Transition Preparation and Post-Transition Evaluation Practices at Adult Clinics That Care for Young Adults With Perinatally Acquired HIV in Massachusetts, United States.
Katherine Tassiopoulos, Betsey John, Anisa Khadraoui, Liz Salomon, Eduardo Vergara, H Dawn Fukuda, Suzanne M Siminski, Russell Van Dyke, Alfred DeMaria
{"title":"Brief Report: Transition Preparation and Post-Transition Evaluation Practices at Adult Clinics That Care for Young Adults With Perinatally Acquired HIV in Massachusetts, United States.","authors":"Katherine Tassiopoulos, Betsey John, Anisa Khadraoui, Liz Salomon, Eduardo Vergara, H Dawn Fukuda, Suzanne M Siminski, Russell Van Dyke, Alfred DeMaria","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most young adults with perinatal HIV (PHIV) transition from pediatric or adolescent to adult clinical care. Although guidelines to increase transition success have been recommended, we know little about uptake of these guidelines, particularly by adult care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered web-based surveys to adult care providers of young adults with PHIV in Massachusetts to evaluate transition preparation and post-transition evaluation practices. We compared transition practices and HIV care continuum outcomes by clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four providers submitted information on 23 adult care clinics. Ten were hospital-based and 13 were community-based clinics. Community-based clinics were more likely than hospital-based clinics to conduct pre-transition (33% vs. 10%) and post-transition (67% vs. 30%) evaluation of patients' readiness to self-manage health care, and to share health outcome information with the pediatric/adolescent care team (50% vs. 20%). Community-based clinics were also more likely to have personnel dedicated to the transition process and to facilitate communication between the patient and pediatric/adolescent care team. Engagement in care was similar for young adults with PHIV seen at community-based and hospital-based clinics (88.2% vs. 85.5%; P = 1.00), but retention in care (76.5% vs. 50.5%; P = 0.05) and viral suppression (88.2% vs. 65.1%; P = 0.08) were higher in community-based than in hospital-based clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Massachusetts, transition practices vary across adult clinics that care for young adults with PHIV. Recommended practices, and HIV care continuum outcomes, were more likely to be met at community-based clinics than hospital-based clinics. Community-based adult care may provide more comprehensive transition practices and serve as a model for hospital-based clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":"98 2","pages":"103-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Most young adults with perinatal HIV (PHIV) transition from pediatric or adolescent to adult clinical care. Although guidelines to increase transition success have been recommended, we know little about uptake of these guidelines, particularly by adult care clinics.
Methods: We administered web-based surveys to adult care providers of young adults with PHIV in Massachusetts to evaluate transition preparation and post-transition evaluation practices. We compared transition practices and HIV care continuum outcomes by clinic setting.
Results: Twenty-four providers submitted information on 23 adult care clinics. Ten were hospital-based and 13 were community-based clinics. Community-based clinics were more likely than hospital-based clinics to conduct pre-transition (33% vs. 10%) and post-transition (67% vs. 30%) evaluation of patients' readiness to self-manage health care, and to share health outcome information with the pediatric/adolescent care team (50% vs. 20%). Community-based clinics were also more likely to have personnel dedicated to the transition process and to facilitate communication between the patient and pediatric/adolescent care team. Engagement in care was similar for young adults with PHIV seen at community-based and hospital-based clinics (88.2% vs. 85.5%; P = 1.00), but retention in care (76.5% vs. 50.5%; P = 0.05) and viral suppression (88.2% vs. 65.1%; P = 0.08) were higher in community-based than in hospital-based clinics.
Conclusions: In Massachusetts, transition practices vary across adult clinics that care for young adults with PHIV. Recommended practices, and HIV care continuum outcomes, were more likely to be met at community-based clinics than hospital-based clinics. Community-based adult care may provide more comprehensive transition practices and serve as a model for hospital-based clinics.
背景:大多数患有围产期艾滋病毒(PHIV)的年轻人从儿科或青少年过渡到成人临床护理。虽然已经推荐了增加过渡成功的指南,但我们对这些指南的吸收知之甚少,特别是在成人护理诊所。方法:我们对马萨诸塞州年轻艾滋病病毒感染者的成人护理提供者进行了基于网络的调查,以评估过渡准备和过渡后的评估实践。我们通过临床环境比较了过渡实践和HIV护理连续结果。结果:24家提供者提交了23家成人护理诊所的信息。10个是医院诊所,13个是社区诊所。以社区为基础的诊所比以医院为基础的诊所更有可能进行转换前(33%对10%)和转换后(67%对30%)对患者自我管理医疗保健的准备程度的评估,并与儿科/青少年护理团队分享健康结果信息(50%对20%)。以社区为基础的诊所也更有可能有专门负责过渡过程的人员,并促进患者与儿科/青少年护理团队之间的沟通。在社区和医院诊所就诊的年轻成年艾滋病毒感染者的护理参与度相似(88.2% vs 85.5%;P = 1.00),但留置率(76.5% vs. 50.5%;P = 0.05)和病毒抑制(88.2% vs. 65.1%;P = 0.08),社区高于医院门诊。结论:在马萨诸塞州,治疗年轻hiv感染者的成人诊所的过渡做法各不相同。社区诊所比医院诊所更有可能实现建议的做法和艾滋病毒护理连续结果。以社区为基础的成人护理可提供更全面的过渡做法,并可作为以医院为基础的诊所的典范。
期刊介绍:
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide.
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.