Evaluating an urgent care antibiotic stewardship intervention: a multi-network collaborative effort.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Daniel E Park, Annie L S Roberts, Rana F Hamdy, Sabrina Balthrop, Patrick Dolan, Cindy M Liu
{"title":"Evaluating an urgent care antibiotic stewardship intervention: a multi-network collaborative effort.","authors":"Daniel E Park, Annie L S Roberts, Rana F Hamdy, Sabrina Balthrop, Patrick Dolan, Cindy M Liu","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urgent care centers (UCCs) have reported high rates of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Prior UCC studies have generally been limited to single networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses are needed. This study examines the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention in reducing inappropriate prescribing for bronchitis and viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in UCCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quality improvement study comparing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates in UCCs after the introduction of an antibiotic stewardship intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Forty-nine UCCs in 27 different networks from 18 states, including 1 telemedicine site.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Urgent care clinicians from a national collaborative of UCCs, all members of the Urgent Care Association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention included signing a commitment statement and selecting from 5 different intervention options during 3 plan-do-study-act cycles. The primary outcome was the percentage of urgent care encounters for viral URTIs or bronchitis with inappropriate prescribing, stratified by clinician engagement and diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using a regression model using a generalized estimating equation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 15,385 encounters, the intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for bronchitis (48% relative decrease, aOR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) and viral URTIs (33%, aOR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82) among actively engaged clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in significant changes for clinicians not actively engaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This intervention was associated with reductions in inappropriate prescribing among actively engaged clinicians. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, active clinician engagement may be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Urgent care centers (UCCs) have reported high rates of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Prior UCC studies have generally been limited to single networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses are needed. This study examines the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention in reducing inappropriate prescribing for bronchitis and viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in UCCs.

Design: A quality improvement study comparing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates in UCCs after the introduction of an antibiotic stewardship intervention.

Setting: Forty-nine UCCs in 27 different networks from 18 states, including 1 telemedicine site.

Participants: Urgent care clinicians from a national collaborative of UCCs, all members of the Urgent Care Association.

Methods: The intervention included signing a commitment statement and selecting from 5 different intervention options during 3 plan-do-study-act cycles. The primary outcome was the percentage of urgent care encounters for viral URTIs or bronchitis with inappropriate prescribing, stratified by clinician engagement and diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using a regression model using a generalized estimating equation.

Results: Among 15,385 encounters, the intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for bronchitis (48% relative decrease, aOR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) and viral URTIs (33%, aOR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82) among actively engaged clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in significant changes for clinicians not actively engaged.

Conclusions: This intervention was associated with reductions in inappropriate prescribing among actively engaged clinicians. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, active clinician engagement may be necessary.

评估紧急护理抗生素管理干预:多网络合作的努力。
目的:急诊中心(UCCs)报告了急性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方率很高。先前的UCC研究通常仅限于单一网络。需要针对常见诊断的广泛的管理工作。本研究探讨了抗生素管理干预在减少UCCs中支气管炎和病毒性上呼吸道感染(URTIs)的不当处方方面的有效性。设计:一项质量改进研究,比较UCCs引入抗生素管理干预后不适当的抗生素处方率。环境:来自18个州的27个不同网络中的49个ucc,包括1个远程医疗站点。参与者:来自全国ucc合作的紧急护理临床医生,紧急护理协会的所有成员。方法:干预包括签署承诺声明,并在3个计划-研究-行动周期中从5个不同的干预方案中进行选择。主要结局是因病毒性尿路感染或支气管炎而使用不当处方的紧急护理遭遇的百分比,并根据临床医生参与和诊断进行分层。3个月的基线期和9个月的干预期采用广义估计方程回归模型进行比较。结果:在15385例就诊病例中,干预与支气管炎不适当抗生素处方的减少相关(相对减少48%,aOR = 0.52;95% CI, 0.33-0.83)和病毒性尿路感染(33%,aOR = 0.67;与基线相比,积极参与临床医生的95% CI为0.55-0.82。对于没有积极参与的临床医生,干预没有导致显著的变化。结论:在积极参与的临床医生中,这种干预与不当处方的减少有关。在UCCs实施管理干预可以减少常见诊断的不适当抗生素处方;然而,积极的临床医生参与可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信