Survival benefit associated with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor burden scores at listing.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000619
Hao Liu, Wei Zhang, Mengyang Di, Hang Lee, Liuhua Shi, Xixi Wang, Zhang Xingyu, Colin A Powers, Vrishketan Sethi, Xingjie Li, Yao Xiao, Andrew Crane, Christof Kaltenmeier, Ramon Bataller Alberola, Jaideep Behari, Andres Duarte-Rojo, Dempsey Hughes, Shahid Malik, Naudia Jonassaint, David Geller, Samer Tohme, Vikraman Gunabushanam, Amit Tevar, Ruy Cruz, Christopher Hughes, Stalin Dharmayan, Subhashini Ayloo, Abhinav Humar, Michele Molinari
{"title":"Survival benefit associated with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor burden scores at listing.","authors":"Hao Liu, Wei Zhang, Mengyang Di, Hang Lee, Liuhua Shi, Xixi Wang, Zhang Xingyu, Colin A Powers, Vrishketan Sethi, Xingjie Li, Yao Xiao, Andrew Crane, Christof Kaltenmeier, Ramon Bataller Alberola, Jaideep Behari, Andres Duarte-Rojo, Dempsey Hughes, Shahid Malik, Naudia Jonassaint, David Geller, Samer Tohme, Vikraman Gunabushanam, Amit Tevar, Ruy Cruz, Christopher Hughes, Stalin Dharmayan, Subhashini Ayloo, Abhinav Humar, Michele Molinari","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) provides significant survival benefits to patients with unresectable HCC. In the United States, organ allocation policies for HCCs within the United Network for Organ Sharing criteria do not prioritize patients based on their differences in oncological characteristics. This study assessed whether transplant-associated survival benefits (TASBs) vary among patients with different tumor burden scores (TBS) measured at the time of listing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from adults applying for HCC MELD exception points between 2002 and 2019, with follow-up until December 2023, using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. TBS was determined based on the largest tumor diameter and number of HCCs. Patients were categorized into low (≤3), intermediate (3.1-5), and high (>5) TBS groups. TASB was measured as the difference in 5-year survival with and without LT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 36,634 LT candidates. High-TBS patients had higher waitlist dropout rates and marginally lower post-transplant survival, resulting in a significantly greater TASB. The 5-year TASB for the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups were 15.7, 22.1, and 25.0 months, respectively. The adjusted survival benefit expressed in 5-year survival differences was 21.9%, 34.5%, and 39.4% in the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups, respectively (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher TBS during listing correlates with greater LT benefits for patients with unresectable HCC within UNOS criteria. We conclude that organ allocation policies in the United States should prioritize patients with high TBS due to their increased risk of dropout and comparable post-transplant survival when compared to patients with less advanced tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) provides significant survival benefits to patients with unresectable HCC. In the United States, organ allocation policies for HCCs within the United Network for Organ Sharing criteria do not prioritize patients based on their differences in oncological characteristics. This study assessed whether transplant-associated survival benefits (TASBs) vary among patients with different tumor burden scores (TBS) measured at the time of listing.

Methods: We analyzed data from adults applying for HCC MELD exception points between 2002 and 2019, with follow-up until December 2023, using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. TBS was determined based on the largest tumor diameter and number of HCCs. Patients were categorized into low (≤3), intermediate (3.1-5), and high (>5) TBS groups. TASB was measured as the difference in 5-year survival with and without LT.

Results: This study included 36,634 LT candidates. High-TBS patients had higher waitlist dropout rates and marginally lower post-transplant survival, resulting in a significantly greater TASB. The 5-year TASB for the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups were 15.7, 22.1, and 25.0 months, respectively. The adjusted survival benefit expressed in 5-year survival differences was 21.9%, 34.5%, and 39.4% in the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Higher TBS during listing correlates with greater LT benefits for patients with unresectable HCC within UNOS criteria. We conclude that organ allocation policies in the United States should prioritize patients with high TBS due to their increased risk of dropout and comparable post-transplant survival when compared to patients with less advanced tumors.

基于肿瘤负荷评分的肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的生存获益。
肝移植(LT)为不可切除的HCC患者提供了显著的生存益处。在美国,在器官共享标准联合网络中,hcc的器官分配政策并没有根据肿瘤特征的差异来优先考虑患者。本研究评估了入选时不同肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)患者的移植相关生存获益(TASBs)是否存在差异。方法:我们分析了2002年至2019年期间申请HCC MELD例外点的成年人的数据,并使用移植接受者科学登记处随访至2023年12月。TBS根据最大肿瘤直径和hcc数量确定。将患者分为低(≤3)、中(3.1-5)、高(bb0 -5) TBS组。TASB测量为有和没有LT的5年生存率的差异。结果:该研究包括36,634名LT候选人。高tbs患者的等待名单辍学率较高,移植后生存率略低,导致TASB显著增加。低、中、高TBS组的5年TASB分别为15.7个月、22.1个月和25.0个月。在低、中、高TBS组中,以5年生存差异表示的调整生存获益分别为21.9%、34.5%和39.4%(结论:在UNOS标准下,上市时TBS越高,不可切除HCC患者的LT获益越大。)我们的结论是,美国的器官分配政策应该优先考虑高TBS患者,因为与晚期肿瘤患者相比,高TBS患者的退出风险增加,移植后生存率也相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信