A Novel Approach to Assessing the Potential of Electronic Decision Support Systems to Improve the Quality of Antenatal Care in Nepal.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Biraj Man Karmacharya, Seema Das, Abha Shrestha, Abha Shrestha, Sulata Karki, Rajani Shakya, Emma Radovich, Loveday Penn-Kekana, Clara Calvert, Oona M R Campell, Ona L McCarthy
{"title":"A Novel Approach to Assessing the Potential of Electronic Decision Support Systems to Improve the Quality of Antenatal Care in Nepal.","authors":"Biraj Man Karmacharya, Seema Das, Abha Shrestha, Abha Shrestha, Sulata Karki, Rajani Shakya, Emma Radovich, Loveday Penn-Kekana, Clara Calvert, Oona M R Campell, Ona L McCarthy","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic decision-support systems (EDSSs) aim to improve the quality of antenatal care (ANC) through adherence to evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the potential of the mHealth integrated model of hypertension, diabetes, and ANC EDSS and the World Health Organization EDSS to improve the quality of ANC in primary-level health care facilities in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2021 to January 2023, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation in 19 primary-level ANC facilities in Bagmati Province, Nepal. Implementation was from March 2022 to August 2022. We conducted a health facility survey, ANC clinical observations, longitudinal case studies and validation workshop, in-depth interviews, monitoring visits, research team debriefing meetings, health care provider attitude survey, and stakeholder engagement and feedback meetings. Results were integrated using concurrent triangulation to develop explanations about the EDSS implementation process and the effects observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 themes on implementation challenges that hindered the EDSS from generating the desired improvements to ANC quality. Facility readiness and provider confidence in using the EDSS were mixed. It was not always used or used as intended, and the approach to ANC provision did not change. EDSS inflexibility did not reflect how staff made decisions about pregnant women's needs or ensure that tests were done at the right time. There was mixed evidence that ANC staff believed that the EDSS benefited their work. The EDSS did not become fully integrated into existing health systems. Engagement of essential stakeholders fell short.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different understandings of and inconsistent use of the EDSS highlighted the need for increased training and support periods, greater stakeholder engagement, and further integration into existing health systems. Our novel approach to integrating findings from multiple substudies offers uniquely valuable insights into the many factors needed for the successful implementation of an EDSS to improve the quality of ANC in Nepal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12692,"journal":{"name":"Global Health: Science and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic decision-support systems (EDSSs) aim to improve the quality of antenatal care (ANC) through adherence to evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the potential of the mHealth integrated model of hypertension, diabetes, and ANC EDSS and the World Health Organization EDSS to improve the quality of ANC in primary-level health care facilities in Nepal.

Methods: From December 2021 to January 2023, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation in 19 primary-level ANC facilities in Bagmati Province, Nepal. Implementation was from March 2022 to August 2022. We conducted a health facility survey, ANC clinical observations, longitudinal case studies and validation workshop, in-depth interviews, monitoring visits, research team debriefing meetings, health care provider attitude survey, and stakeholder engagement and feedback meetings. Results were integrated using concurrent triangulation to develop explanations about the EDSS implementation process and the effects observed.

Results: We identified 9 themes on implementation challenges that hindered the EDSS from generating the desired improvements to ANC quality. Facility readiness and provider confidence in using the EDSS were mixed. It was not always used or used as intended, and the approach to ANC provision did not change. EDSS inflexibility did not reflect how staff made decisions about pregnant women's needs or ensure that tests were done at the right time. There was mixed evidence that ANC staff believed that the EDSS benefited their work. The EDSS did not become fully integrated into existing health systems. Engagement of essential stakeholders fell short.

Conclusion: Different understandings of and inconsistent use of the EDSS highlighted the need for increased training and support periods, greater stakeholder engagement, and further integration into existing health systems. Our novel approach to integrating findings from multiple substudies offers uniquely valuable insights into the many factors needed for the successful implementation of an EDSS to improve the quality of ANC in Nepal.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health: Science and Practice
Global Health: Science and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
178
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP) is a no-fee, open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal aimed to improve health practice, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Our goal is to reach those who design, implement, manage, evaluate, and otherwise support health programs. We are especially interested in advancing knowledge on practical program implementation issues, with information on what programs entail and how they are implemented. GHSP is currently indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, POPLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS,. the Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index, and the USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC). TOPICS: Issued four times a year, GHSP will include articles on all global health topics, covering diverse programming models and a wide range of cross-cutting issues that impact and support health systems. Examples include but are not limited to: Health: Addiction and harm reduction, Child Health, Communicable and Emerging Diseases, Disaster Preparedness and Response, Environmental Health, Family Planning/Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternal Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases, Non-Communicable Diseases/Injuries, Nutrition, Tuberculosis, Water and Sanitation. Cross-Cutting Issues: Epidemiology, Gender, Health Communication/Healthy Behavior, Health Policy and Advocacy, Health Systems, Human Resources/Training, Knowledge Management, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Management and Governance, mHealth/eHealth/digital health, Monitoring and Evaluation, Scale Up, Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信