Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jarupa Yaowalaorng MD, Wiracha Kunthasook MD, Thanin Lokeskrawee MD, PhD, Jayanton Patumanond MD, Phd, DSc, Pakpoom Wongyikul MD, Suppachai Lawanaskol MD, Narada Udornpim
{"title":"Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial","authors":"Jarupa Yaowalaorng MD,&nbsp;Wiracha Kunthasook MD,&nbsp;Thanin Lokeskrawee MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jayanton Patumanond MD, Phd, DSc,&nbsp;Pakpoom Wongyikul MD,&nbsp;Suppachai Lawanaskol MD,&nbsp;Narada Udornpim","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The present study aimed to compare time to effective pain relief between diclofenac 75 mg intramuscular (IM) and tramadol 50 mg intravenous (IV) for ED patients with acute renal colic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled, superiority trial was conducted. Patients diagnosed with acute renal colic (hydronephrosis and/or stone visualisation on point-of-care ultrasound) in the ED were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of 75 mg of diclofenac or IV tramadol 50 mg. Pain relief was defined as a numerical rating scale reduction of two or more points (standard 0–10 scale) and a reduction of at least one level of pain transition question (‘much better’, ‘little better’, ‘unchanged’, ‘little worse’, ‘much worse’). The primary outcome was the multivariable-adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio (SHRs) within 120 min in the ED, estimated using the cumulative incidence function (CIF). The secondary outcome compared the average time to pain relief using the restricted mean survival time (RMST).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 68 patients were randomised, with 34 patients allocated to each group. At the 120 min, pain relief was reported in diclofenac and tramadol, 32 (94%) and 22 (65%) patients respectively. SHR was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.80–4.55; <i>P</i> value &lt;0.001). For diclofenac and tramadol, the RMSTs were 37.09 min (95% CI: 30.00, 44.15) and 78.74 min (95% CI: 66.49, 90.99) respectively, with the difference of 41.67 min (95% CI: 55.71, 27.62).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Diclofenac 75 mg IM provides faster effective pain relief compared with tramadol 50 mg IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The present study aimed to compare time to effective pain relief between diclofenac 75 mg intramuscular (IM) and tramadol 50 mg intravenous (IV) for ED patients with acute renal colic.

Methods

A randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled, superiority trial was conducted. Patients diagnosed with acute renal colic (hydronephrosis and/or stone visualisation on point-of-care ultrasound) in the ED were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of 75 mg of diclofenac or IV tramadol 50 mg. Pain relief was defined as a numerical rating scale reduction of two or more points (standard 0–10 scale) and a reduction of at least one level of pain transition question (‘much better’, ‘little better’, ‘unchanged’, ‘little worse’, ‘much worse’). The primary outcome was the multivariable-adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio (SHRs) within 120 min in the ED, estimated using the cumulative incidence function (CIF). The secondary outcome compared the average time to pain relief using the restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Results

A total of 68 patients were randomised, with 34 patients allocated to each group. At the 120 min, pain relief was reported in diclofenac and tramadol, 32 (94%) and 22 (65%) patients respectively. SHR was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.80–4.55; P value <0.001). For diclofenac and tramadol, the RMSTs were 37.09 min (95% CI: 30.00, 44.15) and 78.74 min (95% CI: 66.49, 90.99) respectively, with the difference of 41.67 min (95% CI: 55.71, 27.62).

Conclusion

Diclofenac 75 mg IM provides faster effective pain relief compared with tramadol 50 mg IV.

Abstract Image

泰国北部急性肾绞痛患者肌注双氯芬酸优于静脉注射曲马多:一项随机、双盲、假对照试验
目的:本研究旨在比较双氯芬酸75mg肌注(IM)和曲马多50mg静脉注射(IV)对ED急性肾绞痛患者的有效疼痛缓解时间。方法:采用随机、双盲、假对照的优势试验。在急诊科诊断为急性肾绞痛(肾积水和/或即时超声显示结石)的患者被随机分配接受75 mg双氯芬酸IM注射或50 mg曲马多静脉注射。疼痛缓解被定义为一个数值评定量表减少2分或更多(标准0-10分),并减少至少一个级别的疼痛过渡问题(“好得多”,“好得多”,“不变”,“差一点”,“差得多”)。主要结局是使用累积发生率函数(CIF)估计ED 120分钟内的多变量调整亚分布风险比(SHRs)。次要终点使用限制平均生存时间(RMST)比较平均时间和疼痛缓解。结果:68例患者被随机分组,每组34例。在120分钟时,双氯芬酸和曲马多分别有32例(94%)和22例(65%)患者疼痛缓解。SHR为2.86 (95% CI: 1.80-4.55;结论:双氯芬酸75mg IM比曲马多50mg IV更能有效缓解疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信