Review article: Efficacy of cyproheptadine in the management of serotonin toxicity following deliberate self-poisoning – A systematic review

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emily King MD, Joe A Rotella MBBS, BSc, MMedTox, FACEM
{"title":"Review article: Efficacy of cyproheptadine in the management of serotonin toxicity following deliberate self-poisoning – A systematic review","authors":"Emily King MD,&nbsp;Joe A Rotella MBBS, BSc, MMedTox, FACEM","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Serotonin toxicity is a potentially fatal condition caused by increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. Cyproheptadine, a serotonergic antagonist, is recommended for treatment; however, there is a lack of evidence to support its use. The present study aimed to evaluate the evidence for the use of cyproheptadine in the management of serotonin toxicity following deliberate self-poisoning. Publications from 2003 were identified by searching electronic databases Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria for studies to be included were determined <i>a priori</i> and consisted of studies published in English (or where an English translation was available) where the primary diagnosis of serotonin toxicity (or syndrome) following deliberate self-poisoning and cyproheptadine was administered as the sole serotonergic antagonist. Studies were evaluated for quality and risk of bias. Twelve articles were identified, of which 11 were case reports and one was a case series. Serotonin toxicity was most attributed to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and all cases fulfilled Hunter serotonin toxicity criteria. Cyproheptadine regimen varied widely with respect to reporting of initial dose, repeat doses, frequency and duration. Few reports commented on clinical resolution and therefore efficacy was not established. All studies were graded as being of very low evidence and at high risk of bias. There is a lack of evidence to support the efficacy of cyproheptadine or its recommendation in clinical guidelines pertaining to the management of serotonin toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serotonin toxicity is a potentially fatal condition caused by increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. Cyproheptadine, a serotonergic antagonist, is recommended for treatment; however, there is a lack of evidence to support its use. The present study aimed to evaluate the evidence for the use of cyproheptadine in the management of serotonin toxicity following deliberate self-poisoning. Publications from 2003 were identified by searching electronic databases Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria for studies to be included were determined a priori and consisted of studies published in English (or where an English translation was available) where the primary diagnosis of serotonin toxicity (or syndrome) following deliberate self-poisoning and cyproheptadine was administered as the sole serotonergic antagonist. Studies were evaluated for quality and risk of bias. Twelve articles were identified, of which 11 were case reports and one was a case series. Serotonin toxicity was most attributed to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and all cases fulfilled Hunter serotonin toxicity criteria. Cyproheptadine regimen varied widely with respect to reporting of initial dose, repeat doses, frequency and duration. Few reports commented on clinical resolution and therefore efficacy was not established. All studies were graded as being of very low evidence and at high risk of bias. There is a lack of evidence to support the efficacy of cyproheptadine or its recommendation in clinical guidelines pertaining to the management of serotonin toxicity.

Abstract Image

综述文章:赛庚啶治疗蓄意自中毒后血清素毒性的疗效——一项系统综述。
血清素毒性是由中枢神经系统血清素能活性增加引起的一种潜在的致命疾病。赛庚胺,一种血清素拮抗剂,推荐用于治疗;然而,缺乏证据支持其使用。本研究旨在评估使用赛庚啶治疗蓄意自中毒后血清素毒性的证据。2003年的出版物通过检索电子数据库Cochrane、MEDLINE、EMBASE和PsycINFO来确定。纳入研究的纳入标准是先验确定的,包括以英文发表的(或有英文翻译的)研究,其中主要诊断为蓄意自中毒后的5 -羟色胺毒性(或综合征),并将赛庚啶作为唯一的5 -羟色胺能拮抗剂。评估研究的质量和偏倚风险。确定了12篇文章,其中11篇是病例报告,1篇是病例丛书。5 -羟色胺毒性主要归因于选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,所有病例均符合亨特5 -羟色胺毒性标准。在报告初始剂量、重复剂量、频率和持续时间方面,赛庚啶方案差异很大。很少有报道评论临床解决,因此疗效不确定。所有的研究都被评为极低证据和高偏倚风险。目前缺乏证据支持赛庚啶的疗效或其在与血清素毒性管理有关的临床指南中的推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信