Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for treatment of bladder calculi: evidence from a systematic literature review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mahir Akram, Clara Cerrato, Dmitry Enikeev, Theodoros Tokas, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for treatment of bladder calculi: evidence from a systematic literature review.","authors":"Mahir Akram, Clara Cerrato, Dmitry Enikeev, Theodoros Tokas, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Bladder stones account for 5% of all urinary tract calculi. Contributing factors include bladder outflow obstruction, infections, foreign bodies, or neurogenic voiding dysfunction. This necessitates an effective treatment modality, and with advances in medical technology, minimally invasive techniques using lasers are being widely adopted. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of laser lithotripsy for treating bladder stones.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A thorough literature review (PROSPERO: CRD 42024551910) was conducted using appropriate search terms up to March 2024. Only original studies written in English, with at least 10 patients with bladder stones treated with laser, were considered with inclusion. A total of 8 studies (411 patients) were identified on screening with a mean age of 59.6 ± 8.5 years and a male: female ratio of 326 : 14. These reviews covered a geographical area of Asia, Europe, and the USA. The mean stone size was 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, and an overall stone-free rate (SFR) postlaser lithotripsy was 96%. Mean operation time was calculated to be 76.36 ± 47.10 min and an overall complication rate of 16.5% (n = 68), with the most common being haematuria (n = 22), followed by UTI (n = 18), incontinence (n = 8), urosepsis (n = 6), clot retention (n = 4), mucosal injury (n = 3) and urinary retention (n = 3). All complications were minor and there were no Clavien >II complications.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Laser lithotripsy for bladder stone achieves an excellent success rate in the form of SFR, combined with a low risk of major complications, and allows concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate, and should be considered in all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Bladder stones account for 5% of all urinary tract calculi. Contributing factors include bladder outflow obstruction, infections, foreign bodies, or neurogenic voiding dysfunction. This necessitates an effective treatment modality, and with advances in medical technology, minimally invasive techniques using lasers are being widely adopted. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of laser lithotripsy for treating bladder stones.

Recent findings: A thorough literature review (PROSPERO: CRD 42024551910) was conducted using appropriate search terms up to March 2024. Only original studies written in English, with at least 10 patients with bladder stones treated with laser, were considered with inclusion. A total of 8 studies (411 patients) were identified on screening with a mean age of 59.6 ± 8.5 years and a male: female ratio of 326 : 14. These reviews covered a geographical area of Asia, Europe, and the USA. The mean stone size was 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, and an overall stone-free rate (SFR) postlaser lithotripsy was 96%. Mean operation time was calculated to be 76.36 ± 47.10 min and an overall complication rate of 16.5% (n = 68), with the most common being haematuria (n = 22), followed by UTI (n = 18), incontinence (n = 8), urosepsis (n = 6), clot retention (n = 4), mucosal injury (n = 3) and urinary retention (n = 3). All complications were minor and there were no Clavien >II complications.

Summary: Laser lithotripsy for bladder stone achieves an excellent success rate in the form of SFR, combined with a low risk of major complications, and allows concomitant treatment of enlarged prostate, and should be considered in all patients.

激光碎石治疗膀胱结石的安全性和有效性:来自系统文献综述的证据。
综述目的:膀胱结石占所有尿路结石的5%。诱发因素包括膀胱流出梗阻、感染、异物或神经源性排尿功能障碍。这需要一种有效的治疗方式,随着医疗技术的进步,使用激光的微创技术正在被广泛采用。本系统综述旨在评价激光碎石术治疗膀胱结石的有效性和安全性。最近的发现:使用适当的搜索词进行了全面的文献综述(PROSPERO: CRD 42024551910),直至2024年3月。只有用英文写的原创研究,至少有10例膀胱结石患者接受激光治疗,才被纳入考虑。筛查共纳入8项研究(411例),平均年龄59.6±8.5岁,男女比例326:14。这些评论涵盖了亚洲、欧洲和美国的地理区域。平均结石大小为3.7±0.7 cm,激光碎石后结石总游离率(SFR)为96%。平均手术时间为76.36±47.10 min,总并发症发生率为16.5% (n = 68),其中以血尿最多(22),其次为尿路感染(18)、尿失禁(8)、尿脓毒症(6)、血块潴留(4)、粘膜损伤(3)、尿潴留(3)。所有并发症均轻微,无Clavien >II并发症。总结:激光碎石治疗SFR形式膀胱结石成功率高,主要并发症风险低,可同时治疗前列腺肥大,应在所有患者中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信