Inpatient Multimodal Pain Regimens Do Not Impact Hospital Length of Stay or Long-term Postoperative Opioid Use Following 1 and 2-Level Lumbar Fusion.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael Carter, Rajkishen Narayanan, Gregory Toci, Yunsoo Lee, Sebastian Fras, Emma Hammelef, Shiraz Mumtaz, Tasha Garayo, Mark Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder
{"title":"Inpatient Multimodal Pain Regimens Do Not Impact Hospital Length of Stay or Long-term Postoperative Opioid Use Following 1 and 2-Level Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Michael Carter, Rajkishen Narayanan, Gregory Toci, Yunsoo Lee, Sebastian Fras, Emma Hammelef, Shiraz Mumtaz, Tasha Garayo, Mark Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine hospital length of stay (LOS) and long-term opioid consumption among patients who received inpatient multimodal analgesia following lumbar spine surgery, as opposed to those who received opioids alone.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Opioids have long been the historical choice for managing postoperative pain. The use of multimodal analgesia has become more commonplace in recent years as it is thought to achieve similar levels of pain control while simultaneously diminishing opioid consumption and decreasing LOS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent 1 or 2-level lumbar fusion from 2018 to 2019 were included. Patients who received opioids on an as-needed basis were propensity-matched to a cohort who received multimodal analgesia based on demographics, surgical approach, and levels fused. LOS was collected for each patient. One year preoperative to 2 postoperative opioid use was obtained from the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and included total prescriptions and total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). A subanalysis was also performed comparing preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative tramadol consumption during this time frame.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 patients received an opioid-only pain regimen, while 207 patients received multimodal analgesia. Patients receiving a multimodal pain regimen consumed a higher daily tramadol MME but a comparable total in-hospital MME to patients in the opioid-only cohort. No statistically significant differences existed between cohorts with regards to LOS, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative opioid consumption, though multimodal patients consumed more tramadol from 0 to 30 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received a multimodal pain regimen consumed comparable quantities of opioids to those who received opioids alone and did not have a longer LOS following 1 and 2-level lumbar fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To determine hospital length of stay (LOS) and long-term opioid consumption among patients who received inpatient multimodal analgesia following lumbar spine surgery, as opposed to those who received opioids alone.

Summary of background data: Opioids have long been the historical choice for managing postoperative pain. The use of multimodal analgesia has become more commonplace in recent years as it is thought to achieve similar levels of pain control while simultaneously diminishing opioid consumption and decreasing LOS.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent 1 or 2-level lumbar fusion from 2018 to 2019 were included. Patients who received opioids on an as-needed basis were propensity-matched to a cohort who received multimodal analgesia based on demographics, surgical approach, and levels fused. LOS was collected for each patient. One year preoperative to 2 postoperative opioid use was obtained from the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and included total prescriptions and total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). A subanalysis was also performed comparing preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative tramadol consumption during this time frame.

Results: A total of 69 patients received an opioid-only pain regimen, while 207 patients received multimodal analgesia. Patients receiving a multimodal pain regimen consumed a higher daily tramadol MME but a comparable total in-hospital MME to patients in the opioid-only cohort. No statistically significant differences existed between cohorts with regards to LOS, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative opioid consumption, though multimodal patients consumed more tramadol from 0 to 30 days postoperatively.

Conclusions: Patients who received a multimodal pain regimen consumed comparable quantities of opioids to those who received opioids alone and did not have a longer LOS following 1 and 2-level lumbar fusion.

住院患者多模式疼痛方案不影响1节段和2节段腰椎融合术后住院时间或术后长期阿片类药物使用
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:确定腰椎手术后接受住院多模式镇痛的患者的住院时间(LOS)和长期阿片类药物消耗,与单独接受阿片类药物的患者相比。背景资料总结:阿片类药物长期以来一直是治疗术后疼痛的历史选择。近年来,多模式镇痛的使用变得越来越普遍,因为人们认为它可以在减少阿片类药物消耗和减少LOS的同时达到相似的疼痛控制水平。材料和方法:纳入2018 - 2019年接受1节段或2节段腰椎融合术的患者。根据需要接受阿片类药物治疗的患者与接受基于人口统计学、手术方式和融合水平的多模式镇痛的队列倾向匹配。收集每位患者的LOS。术前1年至术后2年阿片类药物使用数据来自宾夕法尼亚州处方药监测项目,包括总处方和总吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)。还进行了一项亚分析,比较术前、围手术期和术后曲马多的用量。结果:共有69例患者接受阿片类镇痛方案,207例患者接受多模式镇痛方案。接受多模式疼痛方案的患者每日曲马多MME较高,但与仅使用阿片类药物的患者相比,住院总MME相当。在LOS、术前、围手术期和术后阿片类药物消耗方面,队列之间没有统计学上的显著差异,尽管多模式患者在术后0 - 30天使用了更多的曲马多。结论:接受多模式疼痛治疗方案的患者与单独接受阿片类药物治疗的患者消耗的阿片类药物数量相当,并且在1节段和2节段腰椎融合后没有更长的LOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信