Gang Chen, Zejuan Wang, Xiaona Liu, Aihua Du, Min Li, Yanan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Xueyan Li, Wei Cong, Jin Wang
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.","authors":"Gang Chen, Zejuan Wang, Xiaona Liu, Aihua Du, Min Li, Yanan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Xueyan Li, Wei Cong, Jin Wang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: C<sub>max</sub> was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub> between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: Cmax was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC0-t was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.