Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gang Chen, Zejuan Wang, Xiaona Liu, Aihua Du, Min Li, Yanan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Xueyan Li, Wei Cong, Jin Wang
{"title":"Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.","authors":"Gang Chen, Zejuan Wang, Xiaona Liu, Aihua Du, Min Li, Yanan Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaolin Wang, Xueyan Li, Wei Cong, Jin Wang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: C<sub>max</sub> was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub> between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: Cmax was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC0-t was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.

氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂两种剂型在中国健康志愿者体内的生物等效性研究。
本研究旨在评价两种剂型氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂在中国健康受试者体内的药代动力学特征、安全性和生物等效性。在禁食条件下进行了一项单中心、随机、开放标签、单剂量、两剂型、两序列、两期交叉生物等效性研究。共纳入120名健康男女受试者,其中119名受试者完成了整个研究。母体药物丙酸氟替卡松(FP)在血浆中的主要药代动力学参数如下:试验制剂的最大血药浓度(Cmax)为10.3 pg/mL,从时间0到最后可量化浓度(AUC0-t)的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-∞)为65.6 pg•h/mL,从时间0到无穷无尽(AUC0-∞)的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(86.4 pg•h/mL)。参比制剂Cmax为8.80 pg/mL, AUC0-t为58.2 pg•h/mL, AUC0-∞为75.2 pg•h/mL。两种公式之间AUC0-t、AUC0-∞和Cmax几何均值的90%置信区间分别为105% ~ 120%、103% ~ 120%和112% ~ 124%。结果表明,试验和参考制剂耐受性良好,无严重不良事件报道。根据生物等效性标准,FP鼻喷雾剂(试验制剂)与参比制剂具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信