Application of genetic testing criteria for hereditary breast cancer in South Africa.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
T S Osler, M Schoeman, W J S Pretorius, C G Mathew, J Edge, M F Urban
{"title":"Application of genetic testing criteria for hereditary breast cancer in South Africa.","authors":"T S Osler, M Schoeman, W J S Pretorius, C G Mathew, J Edge, M F Urban","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07585-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) is the commonest cancer in South African women. A proportion are associated with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a BC susceptibility gene. Clinical guidelines for genetic testing are used to optimise variant detection while containing costs. We assessed the detection rate in women of diverse ancestries who met the South African National Department of Health (NDOH) testing guidelines, and analysed relationships between testing criteria, participant characteristics and presence of a BRCA1/2 P/LP variant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records from 376 women with BC who met NDOH criteria and had genetic testing were included. Demographic, clinical and test result data were collated to describe detection rates according to criteria met, and a multivariate analysis conducted to find variables most frequently associated with a P/LP variant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>P/LP variant prevalence in women meeting NDOH testing criteria was 19.9% (75/376). Women meeting ≥ 2 guideline criteria were over twice as likely to have a P/LP variant (OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.27-4.07, p = 0.006), highlighting the guidelines' capacity to stratify risk. Family history (OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.05-3.70, p = 0.03) and Black African ancestry (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.28-5.18, p < 0.01) were independently associated with having a BRCA1/2 P/LP variant when controlling for other variables. Notably, although Black African participants were less likely to report a family history, those that did had higher odds of a P/LP variant in BRCA1/2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate the usefulness of the NDOH guidelines in women of diverse ancestries and provide insight into the factors associated with P/LP variants in understudied African populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07585-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) is the commonest cancer in South African women. A proportion are associated with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a BC susceptibility gene. Clinical guidelines for genetic testing are used to optimise variant detection while containing costs. We assessed the detection rate in women of diverse ancestries who met the South African National Department of Health (NDOH) testing guidelines, and analysed relationships between testing criteria, participant characteristics and presence of a BRCA1/2 P/LP variant.

Methods: Records from 376 women with BC who met NDOH criteria and had genetic testing were included. Demographic, clinical and test result data were collated to describe detection rates according to criteria met, and a multivariate analysis conducted to find variables most frequently associated with a P/LP variant.

Results: P/LP variant prevalence in women meeting NDOH testing criteria was 19.9% (75/376). Women meeting ≥ 2 guideline criteria were over twice as likely to have a P/LP variant (OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.27-4.07, p = 0.006), highlighting the guidelines' capacity to stratify risk. Family history (OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.05-3.70, p = 0.03) and Black African ancestry (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.28-5.18, p < 0.01) were independently associated with having a BRCA1/2 P/LP variant when controlling for other variables. Notably, although Black African participants were less likely to report a family history, those that did had higher odds of a P/LP variant in BRCA1/2.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate the usefulness of the NDOH guidelines in women of diverse ancestries and provide insight into the factors associated with P/LP variants in understudied African populations.

南非遗传性乳腺癌基因检测标准的应用。
目的:乳腺癌(BC)是南非妇女中最常见的癌症。一部分与BC易感基因的致病性或可能致病性(P/LP)变异有关。基因检测的临床指南用于优化变异检测,同时控制成本。我们评估了符合南非国家卫生部(NDOH)检测指南的不同血统女性的检出率,并分析了检测标准、参与者特征和BRCA1/2 P/LP变异存在之间的关系。方法:纳入376例符合NDOH标准并进行基因检测的BC患者的记录。对人口统计学、临床和测试结果数据进行整理,以描述符合标准的检出率,并进行多变量分析,以找到与P/LP变异最常相关的变量。结果:符合NDOH检测标准的女性P/LP变异患病率为19.9%(75/376)。符合≥2个指南标准的女性发生P/LP变异的可能性是其他女性的两倍多(OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.27-4.07, P = 0.006),突出了指南对风险分层的能力。家族史(OR 1.97;95%CI 1.05-3.70, p = 0.03)和非洲黑人血统(OR 2.58;结论:这些结果证明了NDOH指南对不同血统女性的有用性,并为研究不足的非洲人群中p /LP变异的相关因素提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信