Estimation of TP53 mutations for endometrial cancer based on diffusion-weighted imaging deep learning and radiomics features.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lei Shen, Bo Dai, Shewei Dou, Fengshan Yan, Tianyun Yang, Yaping Wu
{"title":"Estimation of TP53 mutations for endometrial cancer based on diffusion-weighted imaging deep learning and radiomics features.","authors":"Lei Shen, Bo Dai, Shewei Dou, Fengshan Yan, Tianyun Yang, Yaping Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13424-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To construct a prediction model based on deep learning (DL) and radiomics features of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and clinical variables for evaluating TP53 mutations in endometrial cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DWI and clinical data from 155 EC patients were included in this study, consisting of 80 in the training set, 35 in the test set, and 40 in the external validation set. Radiomics features, convolutional neural network-based DL features, and clinical variables were analyzed. Feature selection was performed using Mann-Whitney U test, LASSO regression, and SelectKBest. Prediction models were established by gaussian process (GP) and decision tree (DT) algorithms and evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the DL (AUC<sub>training</sub> = 0.830, AUC<sub>test</sub> = 0.779, and AUC<sub>validation</sub> = 0.711), radiomics (AUC<sub>training</sub> = 0.810, AUC<sub>test</sub> = 0.710, and AUC<sub>validation</sub> = 0.839), and clinical (AUC<sub>training</sub> = 0.780, AUC<sub>test</sub> = 0.685, and AUC<sub>validation</sub> = 0.695) models, the combined model based on the GP algorithm, which consisted of four DL features, five radiomics features, and two clinical variables, not only demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy (AUC<sub>training</sub> = 0.949, AUC<sub>test</sub> = 0.877, and AUC<sub>validation</sub> = 0.914) but also led to an improvement in risk reclassification of the TP53 mutation (NIR<sub>training</sub> = 66.38%, 56.98%, and 83.48%, NIR<sub>test</sub> = 50.72%, 80.43%, and 89.49%, and NIR<sub>validation</sub> = 64.58%, 87.50%, and 120.83%, respectively). In addition, the combined model exhibited good agreement and clinical utility in calibration curves and DCA analyses, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A prediction model based on the GP algorithm and consisting of DL and radiomics features of DWI as well as clinical variables can effectively assess TP53 mutation in EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13424-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To construct a prediction model based on deep learning (DL) and radiomics features of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and clinical variables for evaluating TP53 mutations in endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: DWI and clinical data from 155 EC patients were included in this study, consisting of 80 in the training set, 35 in the test set, and 40 in the external validation set. Radiomics features, convolutional neural network-based DL features, and clinical variables were analyzed. Feature selection was performed using Mann-Whitney U test, LASSO regression, and SelectKBest. Prediction models were established by gaussian process (GP) and decision tree (DT) algorithms and evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Compared to the DL (AUCtraining = 0.830, AUCtest = 0.779, and AUCvalidation = 0.711), radiomics (AUCtraining = 0.810, AUCtest = 0.710, and AUCvalidation = 0.839), and clinical (AUCtraining = 0.780, AUCtest = 0.685, and AUCvalidation = 0.695) models, the combined model based on the GP algorithm, which consisted of four DL features, five radiomics features, and two clinical variables, not only demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy (AUCtraining = 0.949, AUCtest = 0.877, and AUCvalidation = 0.914) but also led to an improvement in risk reclassification of the TP53 mutation (NIRtraining = 66.38%, 56.98%, and 83.48%, NIRtest = 50.72%, 80.43%, and 89.49%, and NIRvalidation = 64.58%, 87.50%, and 120.83%, respectively). In addition, the combined model exhibited good agreement and clinical utility in calibration curves and DCA analyses, respectively.

Conclusions: A prediction model based on the GP algorithm and consisting of DL and radiomics features of DWI as well as clinical variables can effectively assess TP53 mutation in EC.

基于弥散加权成像、深度学习和放射组学特征的子宫内膜癌TP53突变评估。
目的:构建基于深度学习(DL)、弥散加权成像(DWI)放射组学特征及临床变量的子宫内膜癌(EC) TP53突变预测模型。方法:本研究纳入155例EC患者的DWI和临床资料,其中80例为训练集,35例为测试集,40例为外部验证集。分析放射组学特征、基于卷积神经网络的深度学习特征和临床变量。使用Mann-Whitney U检验、LASSO回归和SelectKBest进行特征选择。采用高斯过程(GP)和决策树(DT)算法建立预测模型,并通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、净重分类指数(NRI)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对预测模型进行评价。结果:与DL模型(AUCtraining = 0.830, AUCtest = 0.779, AUCvalidation = 0.711)、放射组学模型(AUCtraining = 0.810, AUCtest = 0.710, AUCvalidation = 0.839)和临床模型(AUCtraining = 0.780, AUCtest = 0.685, AUCvalidation = 0.695)相比,基于GP算法的由4个DL特征、5个放射组学特征和2个临床变量组成的组合模型不仅具有最高的诊断效能(AUCtraining = 0.949, AUCtest = 0.877,AUCvalidation = 0.914),但也导致TP53突变风险重分类的改善(NIRtraining = 66.38%、56.98%和83.48%,NIRtest = 50.72%、80.43%和89.49%,NIRvalidation = 64.58%、87.50%和120.83%)。此外,联合模型在校准曲线和DCA分析中分别表现出良好的一致性和临床实用性。结论:基于GP算法,结合DWI DL、放射组学特征及临床变量的预测模型可有效评估EC中TP53突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信