Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the removal of large gallbladder stones: a pilot study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liang Zhu, Jinli He, Zhenzhen Yang, Xi Huang, Junbo Hong, Xiaojiang Zhou, Youxiang Chen, Guohua Li
{"title":"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the removal of large gallbladder stones: a pilot study.","authors":"Liang Zhu, Jinli He, Zhenzhen Yang, Xi Huang, Junbo Hong, Xiaojiang Zhou, Youxiang Chen, Guohua Li","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03590-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy (EGPC) has become an alternative option for treating cholecystolithiasis. However, developing a new method of EGPC in which the gallbladder wall is not damaged remains a challenge. This study introduced a new EGPC method called endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), which preserves the integrity of the gallbladder wall in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, six patients (aged 23-72 years, 3 males and 3 females, Han ethnicity) who had large gallbladder stones (diameter ≥ 1 cm) complicated with common bile duct (CBD) stones and who underwent ERCP combined with ESWL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2022 to December 2022 were enrolled. The patients' clinical characteristics, endoscopic treatment and follow-up data were analyzed. A paired t test was performed to compare the differences in the main serological indicators before and after EGPC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the six patients, five completed EGPC, and one failed due to intolerable abdominal pain during ESWL and was subsequently transferred to surgery. With respect to post-EGPC adverse events, one patient developed mild post-ERCP pancreatitis, and no other adverse events occurred. Both the technical success rate and clinical success rate of ERCP combined with ESWL were 83.3% and the incidence of adverse events was 16.7%. The six patients were followed up for an average of 24 months, during which only one patient experienced a recurrence of gallbladder stones at the 3-month follow-up, but no gallbladder stones were found at the 6-month follow-up after oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP combined with ESWL is a potentially safe and effective treatment for large gallbladder stones.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry site. [Registration number: ChiCTR2200060927 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ); registration date: June 14, 2022].</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03590-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy (EGPC) has become an alternative option for treating cholecystolithiasis. However, developing a new method of EGPC in which the gallbladder wall is not damaged remains a challenge. This study introduced a new EGPC method called endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), which preserves the integrity of the gallbladder wall in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

Methods: In total, six patients (aged 23-72 years, 3 males and 3 females, Han ethnicity) who had large gallbladder stones (diameter ≥ 1 cm) complicated with common bile duct (CBD) stones and who underwent ERCP combined with ESWL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2022 to December 2022 were enrolled. The patients' clinical characteristics, endoscopic treatment and follow-up data were analyzed. A paired t test was performed to compare the differences in the main serological indicators before and after EGPC.

Results: Of the six patients, five completed EGPC, and one failed due to intolerable abdominal pain during ESWL and was subsequently transferred to surgery. With respect to post-EGPC adverse events, one patient developed mild post-ERCP pancreatitis, and no other adverse events occurred. Both the technical success rate and clinical success rate of ERCP combined with ESWL were 83.3% and the incidence of adverse events was 16.7%. The six patients were followed up for an average of 24 months, during which only one patient experienced a recurrence of gallbladder stones at the 3-month follow-up, but no gallbladder stones were found at the 6-month follow-up after oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Conclusions: ERCP combined with ESWL is a potentially safe and effective treatment for large gallbladder stones.

Trial registration: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry site. [Registration number: ChiCTR2200060927 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ); registration date: June 14, 2022].

内镜逆行胆管造影联合体外冲击波碎石术切除大胆囊结石的初步研究。
背景:内镜下保胆胆囊取石术(EGPC)已成为治疗胆囊结石的另一种选择。然而,开发一种不损伤胆囊壁的EGPC新方法仍然是一个挑战。本研究介绍了一种新的EGPC方法——内镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影(ERCP)联合体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL),在治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石时保留了胆囊壁的完整性。方法:选取2022年7月至2022年12月在南昌大学第一附属医院行ERCP联合ESWL手术的大胆囊结石(直径≥1 cm)合并胆总管结石患者6例,年龄23-72岁,男3名,女3名,汉族。分析患者的临床特点、内镜治疗及随访资料。采用配对t检验比较EGPC前后主要血清学指标的差异。结果:6例患者中,5例完成了EGPC, 1例因ESWL中腹痛难忍而失败,随后转至手术。对于egpc后的不良事件,1例患者发生轻度ercp后胰腺炎,未发生其他不良事件。ERCP联合ESWL技术成功率和临床成功率均为83.3%,不良事件发生率为16.7%。6例患者平均随访24个月,随访3个月时仅有1例患者出现胆囊结石复发,但口服熊去氧胆酸6个月后均未发现胆囊结石。结论:ERCP联合ESWL治疗大胆囊结石是一种安全有效的治疗方法。试验注册:本研究在中国临床试验注册网站注册。[注册号:ChiCTR2200060927 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/);报名日期:2022年6月14日]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信