Using routine primary care data in research: (in)efficient case studies and perspectives from the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Holly Tibble, Rami A Alyami, Andrew Bush, Steve Cunningham, Steven Julious, David Price, Jennifer K Quint, Stephen Turner, Kay Wang, Andrew Wilson, Gwyneth A Davies, Mome Mukherjee, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Deepa Varghese, Tracy Jackson, Noelle Morgan, Luke Daines, Hilary Pinnock
{"title":"Using routine primary care data in research: (in)efficient case studies and perspectives from the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research.","authors":"Holly Tibble, Rami A Alyami, Andrew Bush, Steve Cunningham, Steven Julious, David Price, Jennifer K Quint, Stephen Turner, Kay Wang, Andrew Wilson, Gwyneth A Davies, Mome Mukherjee, Amy Hai Yan Chan, Deepa Varghese, Tracy Jackson, Noelle Morgan, Luke Daines, Hilary Pinnock","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify enablers and barriers of using primary care routine data for healthcare research, to formulate recommendations for improving efficiency in knowledge discovery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Data recorded routinely in primary care can be used for estimating the impact of interventions provided within routine care for all people who are clinically eligible. Despite official promotion of 'efficient trial designs', anecdotally researchers in the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (AUKCAR) have encountered multiple barriers to accessing and using routine data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using studies within the AUKCAR portfolio as exemplars, we captured limitations, barriers, successes, and strengths through correspondence and discussions with the principal investigators and project managers of the case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 14 studies (8 trials, 2 developmental studies and 4 observational studies). Investigators agreed that using routine primary care data potentially offered a convenient collection of data for effectiveness outcomes, health economic assessment and process evaluation in one data extraction. However, this advantage was overshadowed by time-consuming processes that were major barriers to conducting efficient research. Common themes were multiple layers of information governance approvals in addition to the ethics and local governance approvals required by all health service research; lack of standardisation so that local approvals required diverse paperwork and reached conflicting conclusions as to whether a study should be approved. Practical consequences included a trial that over-recruited by 20% in order to randomise 144 practices with all required permissions, and a 5-year delay in reporting a trial while retrospectively applied regulations were satisfied to allow data linkage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overcoming the substantial barriers of using routine primary care data will require a streamlined governance process, standardised understanding/application of regulations and adequate National Health Service IT (Information Technology) capability. Without policy-driven prioritisation of these changes, the potential of this valuable resource will not be leveraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to identify enablers and barriers of using primary care routine data for healthcare research, to formulate recommendations for improving efficiency in knowledge discovery.

Background: Data recorded routinely in primary care can be used for estimating the impact of interventions provided within routine care for all people who are clinically eligible. Despite official promotion of 'efficient trial designs', anecdotally researchers in the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (AUKCAR) have encountered multiple barriers to accessing and using routine data.

Methods: Using studies within the AUKCAR portfolio as exemplars, we captured limitations, barriers, successes, and strengths through correspondence and discussions with the principal investigators and project managers of the case studies.

Results: We identified 14 studies (8 trials, 2 developmental studies and 4 observational studies). Investigators agreed that using routine primary care data potentially offered a convenient collection of data for effectiveness outcomes, health economic assessment and process evaluation in one data extraction. However, this advantage was overshadowed by time-consuming processes that were major barriers to conducting efficient research. Common themes were multiple layers of information governance approvals in addition to the ethics and local governance approvals required by all health service research; lack of standardisation so that local approvals required diverse paperwork and reached conflicting conclusions as to whether a study should be approved. Practical consequences included a trial that over-recruited by 20% in order to randomise 144 practices with all required permissions, and a 5-year delay in reporting a trial while retrospectively applied regulations were satisfied to allow data linkage.

Conclusions: Overcoming the substantial barriers of using routine primary care data will require a streamlined governance process, standardised understanding/application of regulations and adequate National Health Service IT (Information Technology) capability. Without policy-driven prioritisation of these changes, the potential of this valuable resource will not be leveraged.

在研究中使用常规初级保健数据:(1)来自英国哮喘应用研究中心的有效案例研究和观点。
目的:我们的目的是确定在医疗保健研究中使用初级保健常规数据的促进因素和障碍,以制定提高知识发现效率的建议。背景:在初级保健中常规记录的数据可用于评估常规护理中提供的干预措施对所有临床符合条件的人的影响。尽管官方提倡“有效的试验设计”,但英国哮喘应用研究中心(AUKCAR)的研究人员在获取和使用常规数据方面遇到了多重障碍。方法:使用AUKCAR投资组合中的研究作为范例,我们通过与案例研究的主要研究者和项目经理的通信和讨论捕获了限制、障碍、成功和优势。结果:我们纳入了14项研究(8项试验,2项发育研究和4项观察性研究)。研究人员一致认为,使用常规初级保健数据可能为有效性结果、健康经济评估和过程评估提供一个方便的数据收集。然而,这一优势被耗时的过程所掩盖,这些过程是进行有效研究的主要障碍。共同的主题是,除了所有卫生服务研究所需的伦理和地方治理批准外,还要进行多层信息治理批准;缺乏标准化,因此地方审批需要不同的文书工作,并且在是否应该批准一项研究方面得出相互矛盾的结论。实际结果包括,为了随机选择144个实践,在所有必要的许可下,试验过度招募了20%,并且在满足回顾性应用法规以允许数据链接的情况下,延迟5年报告试验。结论:克服使用常规初级保健数据的重大障碍将需要精简的治理过程、对法规的标准化理解/应用以及充分的国家卫生服务IT(信息技术)能力。如果没有政策驱动的这些变化的优先次序,这一宝贵资源的潜力将无法发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信