Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Leonardo Campillos-Llanos, Ana Valverde-Mateos, Adrián Capllonch-Carrión
{"title":"Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish.","authors":"Leonardo Campillos-Llanos, Ana Valverde-Mateos, Adrián Capllonch-Carrión","doi":"10.1186/s12859-024-05949-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural language processing (NLP) enables the extraction of information embedded within unstructured texts, such as clinical case reports and trial eligibility criteria. By identifying relevant medical concepts, NLP facilitates the generation of structured and actionable data, supporting complex tasks like cohort identification and the analysis of clinical records. To accomplish those tasks, we introduce a deep learning-based and lexicon-based named entity recognition (NER) tool for texts in Spanish. It performs medical NER and normalization, medication information extraction and detection of temporal entities, negation and speculation, and temporality or experiencer attributes (Age, Contraindicated, Negated, Speculated, Hypothetical, Future, Family_member, Patient and Other). We built the tool with a dedicated lexicon and rules adapted from NegEx and HeidelTime. Using these resources, we annotated a corpus of 1200 texts, with high inter-annotator agreement (average F1 = 0.841% ± 0.045 for entities, and average F1 = 0.881% ± 0.032 for attributes). We used this corpus to train Transformer-based models (RoBERTa-based models, mBERT and mDeBERTa). We integrated them with the dictionary-based system in a hybrid tool, and distribute the models via the Hugging Face hub. For an internal validation, we used a held-out test set and conducted an error analysis. For an external validation, eight medical professionals evaluated the system by revising the annotation of 200 new texts not used in development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the internal validation, the models yielded F1 values up to 0.915. In the external validation with 100 clinical trials, the tool achieved an average F1 score of 0.858 (± 0.032); and in 100 anonymized clinical cases, it achieved an average F1 score of 0.910 (± 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tool is available at https://claramed.csic.es/medspaner . We also release the code ( https://github.com/lcampillos/medspaner ) and the annotated corpus to train the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05949-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Natural language processing (NLP) enables the extraction of information embedded within unstructured texts, such as clinical case reports and trial eligibility criteria. By identifying relevant medical concepts, NLP facilitates the generation of structured and actionable data, supporting complex tasks like cohort identification and the analysis of clinical records. To accomplish those tasks, we introduce a deep learning-based and lexicon-based named entity recognition (NER) tool for texts in Spanish. It performs medical NER and normalization, medication information extraction and detection of temporal entities, negation and speculation, and temporality or experiencer attributes (Age, Contraindicated, Negated, Speculated, Hypothetical, Future, Family_member, Patient and Other). We built the tool with a dedicated lexicon and rules adapted from NegEx and HeidelTime. Using these resources, we annotated a corpus of 1200 texts, with high inter-annotator agreement (average F1 = 0.841% ± 0.045 for entities, and average F1 = 0.881% ± 0.032 for attributes). We used this corpus to train Transformer-based models (RoBERTa-based models, mBERT and mDeBERTa). We integrated them with the dictionary-based system in a hybrid tool, and distribute the models via the Hugging Face hub. For an internal validation, we used a held-out test set and conducted an error analysis. For an external validation, eight medical professionals evaluated the system by revising the annotation of 200 new texts not used in development.

Results: In the internal validation, the models yielded F1 values up to 0.915. In the external validation with 100 clinical trials, the tool achieved an average F1 score of 0.858 (± 0.032); and in 100 anonymized clinical cases, it achieved an average F1 score of 0.910 (± 0.019).

Conclusions: The tool is available at https://claramed.csic.es/medspaner . We also release the code ( https://github.com/lcampillos/medspaner ) and the annotated corpus to train the models.

用于西班牙医学文本语义注释的混合自然语言处理工具。
背景:自然语言处理(NLP)能够提取嵌入在非结构化文本中的信息,例如临床病例报告和试验资格标准。通过识别相关的医学概念,NLP有助于生成结构化和可操作的数据,支持队列识别和临床记录分析等复杂任务。为了完成这些任务,我们为西班牙语文本引入了一个基于深度学习和基于词典的命名实体识别(NER)工具。它执行医学NER和规范化,药物信息提取和检测时间实体,否定和推测,以及时间或经验属性(年龄,禁忌症,否定,推测,假设,未来,家庭成员,患者和其他)。我们使用专门的词典和规则来构建该工具,这些规则改编自NegEx和HeidelTime。使用这些资源,我们注释了1200个文本的语料库,注释者之间的一致性很高(实体的平均F1 = 0.841%±0.045,属性的平均F1 = 0.881%±0.032)。我们使用这个语料库来训练基于transformer的模型(基于roberta的模型,mBERT和mDeBERTa)。我们将它们与基于字典的系统集成在一个混合工具中,并通过拥抱脸中心分发模型。对于内部验证,我们使用了一个固定测试集并进行了错误分析。为了进行外部验证,8名医疗专业人员通过修改200个未在开发中使用的新文本的注释来评估该系统。结果:在内部验证中,模型的F1值达到0.915。在100个临床试验的外部验证中,该工具的平均F1评分为0.858(±0.032);在100例匿名临床病例中,平均F1得分为0.910(±0.019)。结论:该工具可在https://claramed.csic.es/medspaner上获得。我们还发布了代码(https://github.com/lcampillos/medspaner)和带注释的语料库来训练模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信