Dynamics in zebrafish development define transcriptomic specificity after angiogenesis inhibitor exposure.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Julia Nöth, Paul Michaelis, Lennart Schüler, Stefan Scholz, Janet Krüger, Volker Haake, Wibke Busch
{"title":"Dynamics in zebrafish development define transcriptomic specificity after angiogenesis inhibitor exposure.","authors":"Julia Nöth, Paul Michaelis, Lennart Schüler, Stefan Scholz, Janet Krüger, Volker Haake, Wibke Busch","doi":"10.1007/s00204-024-03944-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testing for developmental toxicity is an integral part of chemical regulations. The applied tests are laborious and costly and require a large number of vertebrate test animals. To reduce animal numbers and associated costs, the zebrafish embryo was proposed as an alternative model. In this study, we investigated the potential of transcriptome analysis in the zebrafish embryo model to support the identification of potential biomarkers for key events in developmental toxicity, using the inhibition of angiogenesis as a proof of principle. Therefore, the effects on the zebrafish transcriptome after exposure to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib (1.3 µM and 2.4 µM) and SU4312 (1 µM, 2 µM, and 5 µM), and the putative vascular disruptor compound rotenone (25 nM and 50 nM) were analyzed. An early (2 hpf-hours post fertilization) and a late (24 hpf) exposure start with a time resolved transcriptome analysis was performed to compare the specificity and sensitivity of the responses with respect to anti-angiogenesis. We also showed that toxicodynamic responses were related to the course of the internal concentrations. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) the time series data were compared by applying generalized additive models (GAMs). We observed mainly unspecific developmental toxicity in the early exposure scenario, while a specific repression of vascular related genes was only partially observed. In contrast, differential expression of vascular-related genes could be identified clearly in the late exposure scenario. Rotenone did not show angiogenesis-specific response on a transcriptomic level, indicating that the observed mild phenotype of angiogenesis inhibition may represent a secondary effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03944-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing for developmental toxicity is an integral part of chemical regulations. The applied tests are laborious and costly and require a large number of vertebrate test animals. To reduce animal numbers and associated costs, the zebrafish embryo was proposed as an alternative model. In this study, we investigated the potential of transcriptome analysis in the zebrafish embryo model to support the identification of potential biomarkers for key events in developmental toxicity, using the inhibition of angiogenesis as a proof of principle. Therefore, the effects on the zebrafish transcriptome after exposure to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib (1.3 µM and 2.4 µM) and SU4312 (1 µM, 2 µM, and 5 µM), and the putative vascular disruptor compound rotenone (25 nM and 50 nM) were analyzed. An early (2 hpf-hours post fertilization) and a late (24 hpf) exposure start with a time resolved transcriptome analysis was performed to compare the specificity and sensitivity of the responses with respect to anti-angiogenesis. We also showed that toxicodynamic responses were related to the course of the internal concentrations. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) the time series data were compared by applying generalized additive models (GAMs). We observed mainly unspecific developmental toxicity in the early exposure scenario, while a specific repression of vascular related genes was only partially observed. In contrast, differential expression of vascular-related genes could be identified clearly in the late exposure scenario. Rotenone did not show angiogenesis-specific response on a transcriptomic level, indicating that the observed mild phenotype of angiogenesis inhibition may represent a secondary effect.

在血管生成抑制剂暴露后,斑马鱼发育的动力学决定了转录组特异性。
发育毒性测试是化学法规的一个组成部分。应用的试验是费力和昂贵的,需要大量的脊椎动物试验动物。为了减少动物数量和相关成本,我们建议将斑马鱼胚胎作为替代模型。在这项研究中,我们研究了斑马鱼胚胎模型中转录组分析的潜力,以支持鉴定发育毒性关键事件的潜在生物标志物,利用抑制血管生成作为原理证明。因此,我们分析了暴露于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂索拉非尼(1.3µM和2.4µM)和SU4312(1µM, 2µM和5µM)以及推定的血管干扰物鱼藤酮(25 nM和50 nM)后对斑马鱼转录组的影响。早期(受精后2 hpf小时)和晚期(24 hpf)暴露开始,进行时间分辨转录组分析,比较抗血管生成反应的特异性和敏感性。我们还发现,毒理学反应与体内浓度的变化有关。为了鉴定差异表达基因(DEGs),应用广义加性模型(GAMs)对时间序列数据进行了比较。我们在早期暴露的情况下主要观察到非特异性的发育毒性,而血管相关基因的特异性抑制仅部分观察到。相比之下,在暴露较晚的情况下,血管相关基因的差异表达可以被清楚地识别出来。鱼藤酮在转录组水平上没有表现出血管生成特异性反应,这表明观察到的轻度血管生成抑制表型可能代表了次要效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信