Research Agenda for Entrustable Professional Activities Among US Surgical Specialties.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Gurjit Sandhu, Andrew Jones, Carol L Barry, Jo Buyske, John D Mellinger, Brenessa Lindeman
{"title":"Research Agenda for Entrustable Professional Activities Among US Surgical Specialties.","authors":"Gurjit Sandhu, Andrew Jones, Carol L Barry, Jo Buyske, John D Mellinger, Brenessa Lindeman","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The magnitude of advances in surgical care inspires awe consistent with the impact of these developments on patients' lives. With this comes greater knowledge, new practices, and novel technologies for integration into residency training, making the skillset required of today's residents quite different from those in the past. Competency-based medical education and learner-centered approaches offer innovative and studied methodologies for teaching, learning, and assessment to meet the demands of today's educational environment. The authors provide an overview of competency-based medical education, its association with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones as a competency framework, a description and outline of the emerging execution of Entrustable Professional Activities in the surgical disciplines, and a research agenda focused on Entrustable Professional Activities for American Board of Surgery certified surgical specialties in the United States. The research agenda includes five domains of inquiry: entrustment and practice readiness; bias and environment; distinguishing features and certification; qualitative feedback; and patient outcomes, and builds upon prior work by ten Cate et al. by expanding upon their organizing framework to also include the element of time. Additionally, the authors provide questions and suggest data integration strategies that might foster a breadth of studies investigating the utility of Entrustable Professional Activities in surgical training. Collectively engaging in such a process of evaluation early in the process of competency-based reform will serve to optimize education, assessment, and ultimately patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnitude of advances in surgical care inspires awe consistent with the impact of these developments on patients' lives. With this comes greater knowledge, new practices, and novel technologies for integration into residency training, making the skillset required of today's residents quite different from those in the past. Competency-based medical education and learner-centered approaches offer innovative and studied methodologies for teaching, learning, and assessment to meet the demands of today's educational environment. The authors provide an overview of competency-based medical education, its association with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones as a competency framework, a description and outline of the emerging execution of Entrustable Professional Activities in the surgical disciplines, and a research agenda focused on Entrustable Professional Activities for American Board of Surgery certified surgical specialties in the United States. The research agenda includes five domains of inquiry: entrustment and practice readiness; bias and environment; distinguishing features and certification; qualitative feedback; and patient outcomes, and builds upon prior work by ten Cate et al. by expanding upon their organizing framework to also include the element of time. Additionally, the authors provide questions and suggest data integration strategies that might foster a breadth of studies investigating the utility of Entrustable Professional Activities in surgical training. Collectively engaging in such a process of evaluation early in the process of competency-based reform will serve to optimize education, assessment, and ultimately patient care.

美国外科专业可信赖的专业活动研究议程。
外科护理的巨大进步与这些发展对患者生活的影响一致,令人敬畏。随之而来的是更多的知识、新的实践和新的技术融入住院医师培训,使今天的住院医师所需的技能与过去大不相同。以能力为基础的医学教育和以学习者为中心的方法为教学、学习和评估提供了创新和研究的方法,以满足当今教育环境的需求。作者概述了以能力为基础的医学教育,它与研究生医学教育里程碑认证委员会作为能力框架的联系,描述和概述了外科学科中新兴的可信赖专业活动的执行,以及美国外科委员会认证的美国外科专业的可信赖专业活动的研究议程。研究议程包括五个调查领域:委托和实践准备;偏见与环境;特色与认证;定性反馈;和病人的结果,并建立在之前的工作由ten Cate等人通过扩展他们的组织框架,也包括时间的元素。此外,作者提出了问题,并建议数据整合策略,可能会促进广泛的研究,调查可信赖的专业活动在外科培训中的效用。在以能力为基础的改革过程的早期,集体参与这种评估过程将有助于优化教育、评估和最终的病人护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信