Clinical Benefits of Parasternal Block with Multihole Catheters when Inserted before Sternotomy.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.4103/aca.aca_110_24
Vedat Eljezi, Crispin Jallas, Bruno Pereira, Melanie Chasteloux, Christian Dualé, Lionel Camilleri
{"title":"Clinical Benefits of Parasternal Block with Multihole Catheters when Inserted before Sternotomy.","authors":"Vedat Eljezi, Crispin Jallas, Bruno Pereira, Melanie Chasteloux, Christian Dualé, Lionel Camilleri","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_110_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess whether parasternal block with multihole catheters inserted before surgical incision enables to alleviate postoperative analgesia and opioid reduction in cardiac surgery patients with sternotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six adult patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with sternotomy aged between 18 and 84 olds were included in this prospective, monocentric, open, single-group trial. Two parasternal multihole catheters were inserted on each side of the sternum before the surgical skin incision for cardiac surgery and 10 mL of ropivacaine 7.5 mg mL -1 was initially administered in each catheter. Local anesthetic administration followed by continued infusion at 3 mL hr -1 of ropivacaine 2 mg mL -1 per catheter for 48 h postoperatively upon patient arrival in the intensive care unit. The efficacy of the parasternal block was assessed according to a composite endpoint including pain score at rest, pain score during movements (dynamic pain), and morphine consumption over 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment failed in 11 patients and was considered effective in 15 patients. Sixteen patients out of 26 had a sternal pain score ≤≤3/10 on more than 75% of observations, and the treatment was considered successful. In 23/26 patients (88%), the mean pain score at cough was ≤≤3.5/10 and the treatment was considered successful. Morphine consumption over 48 h was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group 7 mg [6; 21] versus 142 mg [116; 176] ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parasternal block with multihole catheters inserted before the surgical incision is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia and opioid reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_110_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether parasternal block with multihole catheters inserted before surgical incision enables to alleviate postoperative analgesia and opioid reduction in cardiac surgery patients with sternotomy.

Methods: Twenty-six adult patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with sternotomy aged between 18 and 84 olds were included in this prospective, monocentric, open, single-group trial. Two parasternal multihole catheters were inserted on each side of the sternum before the surgical skin incision for cardiac surgery and 10 mL of ropivacaine 7.5 mg mL -1 was initially administered in each catheter. Local anesthetic administration followed by continued infusion at 3 mL hr -1 of ropivacaine 2 mg mL -1 per catheter for 48 h postoperatively upon patient arrival in the intensive care unit. The efficacy of the parasternal block was assessed according to a composite endpoint including pain score at rest, pain score during movements (dynamic pain), and morphine consumption over 48 hours.

Results: The treatment failed in 11 patients and was considered effective in 15 patients. Sixteen patients out of 26 had a sternal pain score ≤≤3/10 on more than 75% of observations, and the treatment was considered successful. In 23/26 patients (88%), the mean pain score at cough was ≤≤3.5/10 and the treatment was considered successful. Morphine consumption over 48 h was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group 7 mg [6; 21] versus 142 mg [116; 176] ( P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Parasternal block with multihole catheters inserted before the surgical incision is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia and opioid reduction.

胸骨切开术前置入胸骨旁阻滞多孔导管的临床疗效。
背景:本研究的目的是评估手术切口前置入胸骨旁阻滞多孔导管是否能减轻胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后镇痛和阿片类药物减少。方法:这项前瞻性、单中心、开放、单组试验纳入了26例年龄在18岁至84岁之间的拟行胸骨切开心脏手术的成年患者。心外科皮肤切口前在胸骨两侧各插入两根胸骨旁多孔导管,每根导管初始注射罗哌卡因7.5 mg mL-1 10 mL。局部麻醉,术后患者到达重症监护病房后,每根导管继续输注罗哌卡因2 mg mL-1,每次3ml hr-1,持续48小时。根据静止时疼痛评分、运动时疼痛评分(动态疼痛)和48小时吗啡用量等综合终点评估胸骨旁阻滞的疗效。结果:治疗失败11例,有效15例。26例患者中有16例胸骨疼痛评分≤3/10,超过75%的观察结果表明治疗成功。23/26例(88%)患者咳嗽时疼痛平均评分≤3.5/10,认为治疗成功。干预组48 h吗啡用量明显低于对照组7 mg [6;[21]对比142毫克[116;[176] (p < 0.001)。结论:手术切口前置入胸骨旁阻滞多孔导尿管是术后镇痛和减少阿片类药物的有效技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信