Barriers to accessing mental health resources as perceived by surgical compared to medical trainees.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jamaica A Westfall-Snyder, Hope A Feldman, Erin Walker, Michelle Thompson, Rebecca L Hoffman
{"title":"Barriers to accessing mental health resources as perceived by surgical compared to medical trainees.","authors":"Jamaica A Westfall-Snyder, Hope A Feldman, Erin Walker, Michelle Thompson, Rebecca L Hoffman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite myriad wellness programs, training demands restrict resident access. This study aimed to evaluate barriers to accessing mental health resources(MHR) and determine if differences exist between medical(MT) and surgical trainees(ST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was performed in one health system assessing awareness of and barriers to accessing MHR. Subjects were either ST(general surgery/surgical subspecialty) or MT(internal medicine/specialty). Descriptive and univariate statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 87 responders(19 ​%); 55(63.2 ​%)MT and 32(36.8 ​%)ST, with a median age of 30 years(IQR29-33). Women comprised (44)55 ​%. Most trainees(62; 71 ​%) perceive availability of time as the biggest barrier to accessing MHR(27(85 ​%) ST vs 35(64 ​%) MT; p ​= ​0.04), and (20)63%ST couldn't find additional weekly time regardless of their mental/emotional state(vs 19(35 ​%)) MT, p ​= ​0.01). Trainees don't share vulnerable emotions to avoid appearing weak (54(51 ​%)). They demonstrate statistically significant poor self-compassion regarding MHR utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trainees' lack of time, internal stigma, and poor self-compassion are significant barriers to accessing MHR. More than MT, ST would not schedule counseling despite their emotional state. Understanding the barriers keeping residents from pursuing MHR provides direction for targeted wellness initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite myriad wellness programs, training demands restrict resident access. This study aimed to evaluate barriers to accessing mental health resources(MHR) and determine if differences exist between medical(MT) and surgical trainees(ST).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in one health system assessing awareness of and barriers to accessing MHR. Subjects were either ST(general surgery/surgical subspecialty) or MT(internal medicine/specialty). Descriptive and univariate statistics were performed.

Results: There were 87 responders(19 ​%); 55(63.2 ​%)MT and 32(36.8 ​%)ST, with a median age of 30 years(IQR29-33). Women comprised (44)55 ​%. Most trainees(62; 71 ​%) perceive availability of time as the biggest barrier to accessing MHR(27(85 ​%) ST vs 35(64 ​%) MT; p ​= ​0.04), and (20)63%ST couldn't find additional weekly time regardless of their mental/emotional state(vs 19(35 ​%)) MT, p ​= ​0.01). Trainees don't share vulnerable emotions to avoid appearing weak (54(51 ​%)). They demonstrate statistically significant poor self-compassion regarding MHR utilization.

Conclusions: Trainees' lack of time, internal stigma, and poor self-compassion are significant barriers to accessing MHR. More than MT, ST would not schedule counseling despite their emotional state. Understanding the barriers keeping residents from pursuing MHR provides direction for targeted wellness initiatives.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信