Subjective cognitive decline predicts longitudinal neuropsychological test performance in an unsupervised online setting in the Brain Health Registry.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jae Myeong Kang, Manchumad Manjavong, Chengshi Jin, Adam Diaz, Miriam T Ashford, Joseph Eichenbaum, Emily Thorp, Elizabeth Wragg, Kenton H Zavitz, Francesca Cormack, Anna Aaronson, R Scott Mackin, Rachana Tank, Bernard Landavazo, Erika Cavallone, Diana Truran, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias, Michael W Weiner, Rachel L Nosheny
{"title":"Subjective cognitive decline predicts longitudinal neuropsychological test performance in an unsupervised online setting in the Brain Health Registry.","authors":"Jae Myeong Kang, Manchumad Manjavong, Chengshi Jin, Adam Diaz, Miriam T Ashford, Joseph Eichenbaum, Emily Thorp, Elizabeth Wragg, Kenton H Zavitz, Francesca Cormack, Anna Aaronson, R Scott Mackin, Rachana Tank, Bernard Landavazo, Erika Cavallone, Diana Truran, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias, Michael W Weiner, Rachel L Nosheny","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01641-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Digital, online assessments are efficient means to detect early cognitive decline, but few studies have investigated the relationship between remotely collected subjective cognitive change and cognitive decline. We hypothesized that the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog), a subjective change measure, predicts longitudinal change in cognition in the Brain Health Registry (BHR), an online registry for neuroscience research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included BHR participants aged 55 + who completed both the baseline ECog and repeated administrations of the CANTAB<sup>®</sup> Paired Associates Learning (PAL) visual learning and memory test. Both self-reported ECog (Self-ECog) and study partner-reported ECog (SP-ECog), and two PAL scores (first attempt memory score [FAMS] and total errors adjusted [TEA]) were assessed. We estimated associations between multiple ECog scoring outputs (ECog positive [same or above cut-off score], ECog consistent [report of consistent decline in any item], and total score) and longitudinal change in PAL. Additionally we assessed the ability of ECog to identify 'decliners', who exhibited the worst PAL progression slopes corresponding to the fifth percentile and below.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 16,683) had an average age of 69.07 ± 7.34, 72.04% were female, and had an average of 16.66 ± 2.26 years of education. They were followed for an average of 2.52 ± 1.63 visits over a period of 11.49 ± 11.53 months. Both Self-ECog positive (estimate = -0.01, p < 0.001, R²m = 0.56) and Self-ECog consistent (estimate=-0.01, p = 0.002, R²m = 0.56) were associated with longitudinal change in PAL FAMS after adjusting demographics and clinical confounders. Those who were Self-ECog total (Odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.390 [1.121-1.708]) and SP-ECog consistent (2.417 [1.591-3.655]) had higher probability of being decliners based on PAL FAMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the BHR's unsupervised online setting, baseline subjective change was feasible in predicting longitudinal decline in neuropsychological tests. Online, self-administered measures of subjective cognitive change might have a potential to predict objective subjective change and identify individuals with cognitive impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01641-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Digital, online assessments are efficient means to detect early cognitive decline, but few studies have investigated the relationship between remotely collected subjective cognitive change and cognitive decline. We hypothesized that the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog), a subjective change measure, predicts longitudinal change in cognition in the Brain Health Registry (BHR), an online registry for neuroscience research.

Methods: This study included BHR participants aged 55 + who completed both the baseline ECog and repeated administrations of the CANTAB® Paired Associates Learning (PAL) visual learning and memory test. Both self-reported ECog (Self-ECog) and study partner-reported ECog (SP-ECog), and two PAL scores (first attempt memory score [FAMS] and total errors adjusted [TEA]) were assessed. We estimated associations between multiple ECog scoring outputs (ECog positive [same or above cut-off score], ECog consistent [report of consistent decline in any item], and total score) and longitudinal change in PAL. Additionally we assessed the ability of ECog to identify 'decliners', who exhibited the worst PAL progression slopes corresponding to the fifth percentile and below.

Results: Participants (n = 16,683) had an average age of 69.07 ± 7.34, 72.04% were female, and had an average of 16.66 ± 2.26 years of education. They were followed for an average of 2.52 ± 1.63 visits over a period of 11.49 ± 11.53 months. Both Self-ECog positive (estimate = -0.01, p < 0.001, R²m = 0.56) and Self-ECog consistent (estimate=-0.01, p = 0.002, R²m = 0.56) were associated with longitudinal change in PAL FAMS after adjusting demographics and clinical confounders. Those who were Self-ECog total (Odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.390 [1.121-1.708]) and SP-ECog consistent (2.417 [1.591-3.655]) had higher probability of being decliners based on PAL FAMS.

Conclusion: In the BHR's unsupervised online setting, baseline subjective change was feasible in predicting longitudinal decline in neuropsychological tests. Online, self-administered measures of subjective cognitive change might have a potential to predict objective subjective change and identify individuals with cognitive impairments.

主观认知能力下降预测纵向神经心理测试表现在一个无监督的在线设置在脑健康登记。
背景:数字化在线评估是早期发现认知能力下降的有效手段,但很少有研究调查远程采集的主观认知变化与认知能力下降之间的关系。我们假设日常认知量表(ECog)是一种主观变化测量,可以预测大脑健康登记处(BHR)认知的纵向变化,这是一个神经科学研究的在线登记处。方法:本研究纳入了55岁以上的BHR参与者,他们完成了基线ECog和CANTAB®配对联想学习(PAL)视觉学习和记忆测试的重复管理。评估自我报告的ECog (Self-ECog)和研究伙伴报告的ECog (SP-ECog),以及两个PAL评分(首次尝试记忆评分[FAMS]和调整后的总错误[TEA])。我们估计了多个ECog评分输出(ECog阳性[相同或高于临界值],ECog一致[任何项目持续下降的报告]和总分)与PAL纵向变化之间的关联。此外,我们评估了ECog识别“下降者”的能力,这些人表现出与第五百分位及以下相对应的最差PAL进展斜率。结果:参与者(n = 16683)平均年龄69.07±7.34岁,女性占72.04%,平均文化程度为16.66±2.26年。随访时间为11.49±11.53个月,平均随访2.52±1.63次。结论:在BHR的无监督在线设置中,基线主观变化在预测神经心理测试纵向下降方面是可行的。在网上,自我管理的主观认知变化测量可能有预测客观主观变化和识别认知障碍个体的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信