Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
T Cengiz, A Yurtbay, O Muslu, Ş Aydin Şimşek, A B Özbalci, H S Coşkun, Y S Bariş, N Dabak
{"title":"Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors.","authors":"T Cengiz, A Yurtbay, O Muslu, Ş Aydin Şimşek, A B Özbalci, H S Coşkun, Y S Bariş, N Dabak","doi":"10.55095/ACHOT2024/042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Open (incisional) biopsies have long been accepted as the gold standard in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. However, the main disadvantage of this method is that it can lead to increased contamination, hematoma, infection, and pathological fracture. Compared to open biopsies, percutaneous core needle biopsies are less invasive, do not require hospitalization, have low costs and low complication rates, and there is no need for wound healing in cases that require radiotherapy. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of percutaneous core needle biopsy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included the results of 250 percutaneous core needle biopsies of 244 patients who presented at the tertiary university hospital between September 2012 - September 2022 and were diagnosed with a bone or soft tissue tumor using the percutaneous core needle biopsy method and then underwent surgical excision in the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated for the percutaneous core needle biopsy method according to the compatibility of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CT-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 88.9%. Percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist without imaging guidance for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. USGguided percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 96,7% (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of open biopsies ranges from 91% to 99% in the literature. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies in recent studies ranges from 76% to 99%. Compared to the literature, our study has shown that biopsies performed by orthopedic specialists have a high diagnostic power (96% for bone-derived lesions; 92% for soft tissue-derived lesions).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous core needle biopsy is highly effective and reliable in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. Managing patients by a team using a multidisciplinary approach will increase diagnostic success.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>core needle biopsy, percutaneous, diagnostic accuracy, radiology guided biopsy, bone and soft tissue tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"91 6","pages":"376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/ACHOT2024/042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Open (incisional) biopsies have long been accepted as the gold standard in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. However, the main disadvantage of this method is that it can lead to increased contamination, hematoma, infection, and pathological fracture. Compared to open biopsies, percutaneous core needle biopsies are less invasive, do not require hospitalization, have low costs and low complication rates, and there is no need for wound healing in cases that require radiotherapy. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of percutaneous core needle biopsy.

Material and methods: The study included the results of 250 percutaneous core needle biopsies of 244 patients who presented at the tertiary university hospital between September 2012 - September 2022 and were diagnosed with a bone or soft tissue tumor using the percutaneous core needle biopsy method and then underwent surgical excision in the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated for the percutaneous core needle biopsy method according to the compatibility of the results.

Results: A fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CT-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 88.9%. Percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist without imaging guidance for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. USGguided percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 96,7% (p<0.001).

Discussion: The diagnostic accuracy of open biopsies ranges from 91% to 99% in the literature. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies in recent studies ranges from 76% to 99%. Compared to the literature, our study has shown that biopsies performed by orthopedic specialists have a high diagnostic power (96% for bone-derived lesions; 92% for soft tissue-derived lesions).

Conclusions: Percutaneous core needle biopsy is highly effective and reliable in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. Managing patients by a team using a multidisciplinary approach will increase diagnostic success.

Key words: core needle biopsy, percutaneous, diagnostic accuracy, radiology guided biopsy, bone and soft tissue tumors.

骨及软组织肿瘤经皮穿刺活检诊断准确性的评价。
研究目的:开放(切口)活检长期以来被认为是诊断骨和软组织肿瘤的金标准。然而,这种方法的主要缺点是它会导致污染、血肿、感染和病理性骨折的增加。与开放式活检相比,经皮穿刺活检侵入性小,不需要住院治疗,费用低,并发症发生率低,需要放疗的病例不需要伤口愈合。本研究评估经皮穿刺活检诊断的准确性和可靠性。材料和方法:本研究纳入了2012年9月至2022年9月在第三大学医院经皮穿刺穿刺活检诊断为骨或软组织肿瘤并在骨科与创伤科诊所接受手术切除的244例患者的250例经皮穿刺穿刺活检结果。根据结果的相容性计算经皮穿刺穿刺活检法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确率。结果:由骨科医生对源自骨骼的病变进行透视引导下的经皮Jamshidi针活检,诊断准确率为96%。放射科医师对源自骨骼的病变进行ct引导下的经皮Jamshidi针活检,诊断准确率为88.9%。由骨科医生在没有影像学指导的情况下对软组织病变进行经皮穿刺活检,诊断准确率为92%。由放射科医生对软组织病变进行的USGguided经皮truc -cut needle biopsy的诊断准确率为96.7%(讨论:文献中开放式活检的诊断准确率为91%至99%)。此外,在最近的研究中,核心针活检的诊断准确率在76%到99%之间。与文献相比,我们的研究表明,骨科专家进行的活检具有很高的诊断能力(96%为骨源性病变;92%为软组织源性病变)。结论:经皮穿刺活检对骨及软组织肿瘤的诊断是非常有效和可靠的。采用多学科方法的团队管理患者将提高诊断成功率。关键词:芯针活检,经皮穿刺,诊断准确性,放射学引导活检,骨及软组织肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信