Esketamine Nasal Spray in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zhibin Wang, Lili Jiang, Wenzhuang Ma, Xingyue Li, Qiushi Gao, Siyu Lian, Weiwei Yu
{"title":"Esketamine Nasal Spray in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zhibin Wang, Lili Jiang, Wenzhuang Ma, Xingyue Li, Qiushi Gao, Siyu Lian, Weiwei Yu","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being approved by the US FDA and the EU European Medicines Agency, the performance of esketamine nasal spray as an adjunctive therapy with an antidepressant in major depressive disorder is still controversial. Comprehensive retrieval in Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing esketamine nasal spray versus control in major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, from baseline to Day 2 or Day 28 for patients with or without suicidal ideation, respectively. The long-term efficacy outcome was the relapse rate of patients who achieved stable remission. The certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendation. Esketamine nasal spray was superior to placebo in reduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to Day 28 in patients without suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.24, 95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.09, P = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 24%), and on Day 2 in patients with suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.30, 95% confidence interval: -0.47, -0.12, P = 0.0008, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The long-term relapse rate was significantly lower in the esketamine nasal spray group than in the placebo/quetiapine group (risk ratio: RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.80, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The rate of suicidal ideation was similar between the two groups. The certainty of evidence was graded as \"moderate\" or \"high\" in the abovementioned results. Esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with an antidepressant effectively controls short-term and long-term depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression, with a manageable trade-off between efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being approved by the US FDA and the EU European Medicines Agency, the performance of esketamine nasal spray as an adjunctive therapy with an antidepressant in major depressive disorder is still controversial. Comprehensive retrieval in Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing esketamine nasal spray versus control in major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, from baseline to Day 2 or Day 28 for patients with or without suicidal ideation, respectively. The long-term efficacy outcome was the relapse rate of patients who achieved stable remission. The certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendation. Esketamine nasal spray was superior to placebo in reduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to Day 28 in patients without suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.24, 95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.09, P = 0.001, I2 = 24%), and on Day 2 in patients with suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.30, 95% confidence interval: -0.47, -0.12, P = 0.0008, I2 = 0%). The long-term relapse rate was significantly lower in the esketamine nasal spray group than in the placebo/quetiapine group (risk ratio: RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.80, I2 = 0%). The rate of suicidal ideation was similar between the two groups. The certainty of evidence was graded as "moderate" or "high" in the abovementioned results. Esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with an antidepressant effectively controls short-term and long-term depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression, with a manageable trade-off between efficacy and safety.

艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机对照试验的meta分析。
尽管艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂已获得美国食品药品监督管理局和欧盟药品管理局的批准,但其作为抗抑郁药辅助治疗重度抑郁症的效果仍存在争议。在Embase、Pubmed和Web of Science中进行了综合检索,以确定比较艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂与对照组在重度抑郁症或治疗难治性抑郁症中的随机对照试验。主要疗效结果是蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表从基线降低到第2天或第28天,分别为有或没有自杀意念的患者。长期疗效结果是达到稳定缓解的患者的复发率。根据Cochrane推荐评估证据的确定性。艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂在无自杀意念患者的基线至第28天(标准化平均差值:-0.24,95%可信区间:-0.38,-0.09,P = 0.001, I2 = 24%)和有自杀意念患者的第2天(标准化平均差值:-0.30,95%可信区间:-0.47,-0.12,P = 0.0008, I2 = 0%)降低蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)均优于安慰剂。艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂组的长期复发率明显低于安慰剂/喹硫平组(风险比:RR: 0.60, 95%可信区间:0.45-0.80,I2 = 0%)。两组的自杀意念率相似。在上述结果中,证据的确定性被评为“中等”或“高”。艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂联合抗抑郁药可有效控制重度抑郁症和治疗难治性抑郁症的短期和长期抑郁症状,在疗效和安全性之间实现可管理的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信