Meray Medhat Shokry Zaghary, Hasnaa Ahmed Ahmed Ali, Asmaa Mohammed Khalaf Ahmed
{"title":"The performance of ejection fraction as a predictor of mortality and morbidity in acute aluminium phosphide poisoning.","authors":"Meray Medhat Shokry Zaghary, Hasnaa Ahmed Ahmed Ali, Asmaa Mohammed Khalaf Ahmed","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfae232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aluminium phosphide poison become an alarming, well-known, effective suicidal poison with a high mortality rate. There is a need for a simple tool that can triage patients with bad prognosis. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of ejection fraction as a predictor of mortality and morbidity in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity cases. The study involved 70 cases of acutely aluminium phosphide-poisoned patients in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. The study found that 54.3% of the cases were males and 45.7% were females, with a mean age of 22.4 ± 11.8 years old. The oral route was the route of administration of all cases, and the intention of poisoning was intentional in 84.3% of cases. Regarding the outcome of patients, 62.9% of the cases recovered, and 37.1% died. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve found that the ejection fraction below 37.5% had an accuracy rate of 96.8% with excellent discrimination for mortality, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.2%, positive predictive value of 89.6%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The ejection fraction below 52.5% had an accuracy rate of 89% with good discrimination for complications, sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 96.8%, positive predictive value of 90.9%, and negative predictive value of 93.7%. So, the ejection fraction plays an essential tool in predicting mortality and complications in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity and should be assessed on every patient in the first 24 h of admission to facilitate the triage of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"tfae232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aluminium phosphide poison become an alarming, well-known, effective suicidal poison with a high mortality rate. There is a need for a simple tool that can triage patients with bad prognosis. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of ejection fraction as a predictor of mortality and morbidity in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity cases. The study involved 70 cases of acutely aluminium phosphide-poisoned patients in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. The study found that 54.3% of the cases were males and 45.7% were females, with a mean age of 22.4 ± 11.8 years old. The oral route was the route of administration of all cases, and the intention of poisoning was intentional in 84.3% of cases. Regarding the outcome of patients, 62.9% of the cases recovered, and 37.1% died. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve found that the ejection fraction below 37.5% had an accuracy rate of 96.8% with excellent discrimination for mortality, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.2%, positive predictive value of 89.6%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The ejection fraction below 52.5% had an accuracy rate of 89% with good discrimination for complications, sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 96.8%, positive predictive value of 90.9%, and negative predictive value of 93.7%. So, the ejection fraction plays an essential tool in predicting mortality and complications in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity and should be assessed on every patient in the first 24 h of admission to facilitate the triage of these patients.