New Evidence of Causal Relationships Between Government Spending and Economic Growth in the United Kingdom

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Stella Karagianni, Maria Pempetzoglou, Anastasios Saraidaris
{"title":"New Evidence of Causal Relationships Between Government Spending and Economic Growth in the United Kingdom","authors":"Stella Karagianni,&nbsp;Maria Pempetzoglou,&nbsp;Anastasios Saraidaris","doi":"10.1007/s11293-024-09814-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driven by the unfolding asymmetry in the United Kingdom output dynamics since 1955, this paper aims to explore the contribution of fiscal policy. To this end, the dynamic connectivity between United Kingdom government spending and economic growth is assessed through the concept of causality. Since the implementation of economic policy can asymmetrically affect output dynamics, both linear and nonlinear causality tests are employed. The empirical findings underscore the feature of nonlinearity. The detected nonlinear causality appears to be subject to different economic regimes. During the Great Moderation, the linear connectivity between government spending and economic growth strengthened, while in the post-2007 era, the absence of substantial linkages supports the idea that the information transmission channel between government spending and economic growth is broken. The study’s novelty lies in the implementation of linear and nonlinear causality tests within a rolling windows analysis framework. This approach enables the exploration of connectivity characteristics between United Kingdom government spending and output growth under changing monetary policy and economic stances. The findings confirm the role of fiscal policy as an economic stabilizer, mainly during periods of loose monetary policy with moderate inflation and predominantly positive economic growth rates. The results also reveal a significant structural break in 2007, coinciding with a change in monetary conditions and a period of limited fiscal control over output growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"52 4","pages":"187 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-024-09814-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven by the unfolding asymmetry in the United Kingdom output dynamics since 1955, this paper aims to explore the contribution of fiscal policy. To this end, the dynamic connectivity between United Kingdom government spending and economic growth is assessed through the concept of causality. Since the implementation of economic policy can asymmetrically affect output dynamics, both linear and nonlinear causality tests are employed. The empirical findings underscore the feature of nonlinearity. The detected nonlinear causality appears to be subject to different economic regimes. During the Great Moderation, the linear connectivity between government spending and economic growth strengthened, while in the post-2007 era, the absence of substantial linkages supports the idea that the information transmission channel between government spending and economic growth is broken. The study’s novelty lies in the implementation of linear and nonlinear causality tests within a rolling windows analysis framework. This approach enables the exploration of connectivity characteristics between United Kingdom government spending and output growth under changing monetary policy and economic stances. The findings confirm the role of fiscal policy as an economic stabilizer, mainly during periods of loose monetary policy with moderate inflation and predominantly positive economic growth rates. The results also reveal a significant structural break in 2007, coinciding with a change in monetary conditions and a period of limited fiscal control over output growth.

英国政府支出与经济增长因果关系的新证据
受1955年以来英国产出动态的不对称性驱动,本文旨在探讨财政政策的贡献。为此,通过因果关系的概念来评估英国政府支出与经济增长之间的动态联系。由于经济政策的实施可以不对称地影响产出动态,因此采用了线性和非线性因果关系检验。实证结果强调了非线性的特征。检测到的非线性因果关系似乎受制于不同的经济制度。在大稳健时期,政府支出与经济增长之间的线性联系增强,而在2007年后,实质性联系的缺失支持了政府支出与经济增长之间的信息传递渠道断裂的观点。该研究的新颖之处在于在滚动窗分析框架内实施线性和非线性因果关系检验。这种方法可以探索在不断变化的货币政策和经济立场下英国政府支出与产出增长之间的连通性特征。研究结果证实了财政政策作为经济稳定器的作用,主要是在宽松的货币政策期间,适度的通货膨胀和主要的正经济增长率。研究结果还显示,2007年出现了重大的结构性断裂,与此同时,货币状况发生了变化,财政对产出增长的控制有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信