A modified suture technique using polydioxanone (PDS II) for capsule closure in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study compared with traditional suture technique

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Caidong Zhang, Jing Tang, Jiayan Deng, Xiaozhong Luo, Chao Wu, Tongzheng Zhang, Weishi Xiang, Gang Wu
{"title":"A modified suture technique using polydioxanone (PDS II) for capsule closure in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study compared with traditional suture technique","authors":"Caidong Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Tang,&nbsp;Jiayan Deng,&nbsp;Xiaozhong Luo,&nbsp;Chao Wu,&nbsp;Tongzheng Zhang,&nbsp;Weishi Xiang,&nbsp;Gang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05677-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe and evaluate the modified suture technique using PDS II for capsule closure in Total knee arthroplasty.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred-five patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee received Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in our department. The arthrotomy wounds were closed randomly utilizing either modified suture (the MS group, 53 patients) or traditional suture (the TS group, 52 patients) techniques. The time of suturing, rupture of the suture, water tightness, wound seepage and the days of hospitalization were recorded and compared between the two groups. Complications such as infection and rejection of the wound were also assessed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Records indicated significantly shorter time of suturing for the capsule in the MS group (4.6 ± 0.6 min) than in the TS group (16.8 ± 1.1 min, P &lt; 0.001). The mean time of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the MS group (7.8 + 1.8d) than in the TS group (13.1 + 2.7d, P &lt; 0.001).There were 51 cases in MS group and 42 cases in TS group showed good tightness, the rate of tightness in the MS group (51/53) was significantly higher than in the TS group (42/52, P = 0.015).The rate of postoperative wound seepage in the MS group (3/53) was significantly lower than in the TS group (11/52, P = 0.023). The rate of rupture of the suture in the MS group (0/53) showed no significantly difference compared with the TS group (3/52, P = 0.118). There were no complications such as infection and rejection occurred in both groups.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified suture technique using PDS II appears to be a promising option for the capsule closure in TKA because it was associated with shorter surgical time, better water tightness, fewer wound see-page, shorter of hospitalization and relatively fewer complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05677-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05677-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and evaluate the modified suture technique using PDS II for capsule closure in Total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

One hundred-five patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee received Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in our department. The arthrotomy wounds were closed randomly utilizing either modified suture (the MS group, 53 patients) or traditional suture (the TS group, 52 patients) techniques. The time of suturing, rupture of the suture, water tightness, wound seepage and the days of hospitalization were recorded and compared between the two groups. Complications such as infection and rejection of the wound were also assessed.

Results

Records indicated significantly shorter time of suturing for the capsule in the MS group (4.6 ± 0.6 min) than in the TS group (16.8 ± 1.1 min, P < 0.001). The mean time of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the MS group (7.8 + 1.8d) than in the TS group (13.1 + 2.7d, P < 0.001).There were 51 cases in MS group and 42 cases in TS group showed good tightness, the rate of tightness in the MS group (51/53) was significantly higher than in the TS group (42/52, P = 0.015).The rate of postoperative wound seepage in the MS group (3/53) was significantly lower than in the TS group (11/52, P = 0.023). The rate of rupture of the suture in the MS group (0/53) showed no significantly difference compared with the TS group (3/52, P = 0.118). There were no complications such as infection and rejection occurred in both groups.

Conclusion

The modified suture technique using PDS II appears to be a promising option for the capsule closure in TKA because it was associated with shorter surgical time, better water tightness, fewer wound see-page, shorter of hospitalization and relatively fewer complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信