Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy scale: a methodological study.

Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.4069/whn.2024.10.18
Yeşim Altuntas, Ayse Kilic Ucar
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy scale: a methodological study.","authors":"Yeşim Altuntas, Ayse Kilic Ucar","doi":"10.4069/whn.2024.10.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to translate the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy (MHELIP) scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in the Turkish population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants in this methodological study included 250 pregnant women who presented to the antenatal clinic of the Florence Nightingale Hospital in Istanbul, Turkiye. Content validity was assessed using expert approval. Confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling were used to assess the validity. Criterion validity was evaluated using the shortform health literacy survey tool, the Short-Form Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-SF12). To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha, item analysis, and the test-retest method were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 32.02±4.15 years. The content validity index of the scale was .99. The scale had a four-factor structure that fit well with 48 items. \"Maternal health knowledge,\" \"maternal health information search,\" \"maternal health information assessment,\" and \"maternal health decision making and behavior\" subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of .91, .76, .85, and .90, respectively. The MHELIP and HLS-SF12 scores were significantly correlated (r=.422, p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MHELIP was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool in pregnant Turkish women.</p>","PeriodicalId":519895,"journal":{"name":"Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)","volume":"30 4","pages":"330-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4069/whn.2024.10.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to translate the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy (MHELIP) scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in the Turkish population.

Methods: The participants in this methodological study included 250 pregnant women who presented to the antenatal clinic of the Florence Nightingale Hospital in Istanbul, Turkiye. Content validity was assessed using expert approval. Confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling were used to assess the validity. Criterion validity was evaluated using the shortform health literacy survey tool, the Short-Form Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-SF12). To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha, item analysis, and the test-retest method were used.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 32.02±4.15 years. The content validity index of the scale was .99. The scale had a four-factor structure that fit well with 48 items. "Maternal health knowledge," "maternal health information search," "maternal health information assessment," and "maternal health decision making and behavior" subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of .91, .76, .85, and .90, respectively. The MHELIP and HLS-SF12 scores were significantly correlated (r=.422, p<.001).

Conclusion: The MHELIP was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool in pregnant Turkish women.

土耳其版孕妇健康素养量表的效度和信度:一项方法学研究。
目的:本研究旨在将妊娠期孕产妇健康素养量表(MHELIP)翻译成土耳其语,并评估其在土耳其人群中使用的效度和可靠性。方法:本方法学研究的参与者包括在土耳其伊斯坦布尔佛罗伦萨南丁格尔医院产前诊所就诊的250名孕妇。内容效度评估采用专家审定。采用验证性因子分析、探索性因子分析和结构方程模型评估效度。使用简略健康素养调查工具——简略健康素养问卷(HLS-SF12)评估标准效度。信度评估采用Cronbach’s alpha、项目分析和重测法。结果:患者平均年龄32.02±4.15岁。量表的内容效度指数为0.99。该量表有一个四因素结构,适合48个项目。“孕产妇健康知识”、“孕产妇健康信息搜索”、“孕产妇健康信息评估”和“孕产妇健康决策与行为”分量表的Cronbach α值分别为0.91、0.76、0.85和0.90。MHELIP与HLS-SF12评分显著相关(r=。结论:MHELIP是一种有效可靠的测量工具,适用于土耳其孕妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信