Pediatric Primary Care Telemedicine: Perspectives from English- and Spanish-Speaking Medicaid Enrollees.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2024.0028
Anne R Links, Eliana M Perrin, Sarah Polk, Divya Konduru, Shafkat Meraj, Nakiya N Showell, Suzanne M Grieb, Helen Hughes
{"title":"Pediatric Primary Care Telemedicine: Perspectives from English- and Spanish-Speaking Medicaid Enrollees.","authors":"Anne R Links, Eliana M Perrin, Sarah Polk, Divya Konduru, Shafkat Meraj, Nakiya N Showell, Suzanne M Grieb, Helen Hughes","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2024.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To qualitatively explore Medicaid-enrolled parents' and young adult patients' perspectives and experiences with telemedicine in pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to explore their experiences with telemedicine. Participants consisted of English- and Spanish-speaking parents and young adults (18-21) who engaged in a telemedicine visit between March 15, 2021 and December 31, 2022 at two pediatric primary care clinics whose patients are predominantly insured by Medicaid. A qualitative descriptive design was used to develop a taxonomy. Frequencies were obtained to identify the most prevalent themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants (22 parents, 4 young adults) were interviewed. Twelve (46%) participants were English-speaking and 14 (53%) were Spanish-speaking. Four domains were identified, each further classified into themes: pre-visit expectations (option for in-person visit, general anticipation, and specific worries), visit experience (general sentiment, technology, and quality of care), comfort (with overall process, privacy, and communication), and feelings about telemedicine (advantages, disadvantages, and loss of telemedicine). Although many participants had negative expectations of telemedicine prior to their appointment, a majority indicated positive experiences with visits and concerns about a possible future where telemedicine visits at home were no longer covered by their health insurance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most participants indicated positive experiences with telemedicine and perceived negative impact if access was removed. Findings related to perceived quality of care, advantages, and disadvantages suggest that patient preferences and individual circumstances should be taken into account when choosing visit modality in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"380-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To qualitatively explore Medicaid-enrolled parents' and young adult patients' perspectives and experiences with telemedicine in pediatric primary care.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to explore their experiences with telemedicine. Participants consisted of English- and Spanish-speaking parents and young adults (18-21) who engaged in a telemedicine visit between March 15, 2021 and December 31, 2022 at two pediatric primary care clinics whose patients are predominantly insured by Medicaid. A qualitative descriptive design was used to develop a taxonomy. Frequencies were obtained to identify the most prevalent themes.

Results: Twenty-six participants (22 parents, 4 young adults) were interviewed. Twelve (46%) participants were English-speaking and 14 (53%) were Spanish-speaking. Four domains were identified, each further classified into themes: pre-visit expectations (option for in-person visit, general anticipation, and specific worries), visit experience (general sentiment, technology, and quality of care), comfort (with overall process, privacy, and communication), and feelings about telemedicine (advantages, disadvantages, and loss of telemedicine). Although many participants had negative expectations of telemedicine prior to their appointment, a majority indicated positive experiences with visits and concerns about a possible future where telemedicine visits at home were no longer covered by their health insurance.

Discussion: Most participants indicated positive experiences with telemedicine and perceived negative impact if access was removed. Findings related to perceived quality of care, advantages, and disadvantages suggest that patient preferences and individual circumstances should be taken into account when choosing visit modality in similar settings.

儿科初级保健远程医疗:从英语和西班牙语讲医疗补助登记者的观点。
目的:定性地探讨参加医疗补助的家长和年轻成人患者在儿科初级保健中远程医疗的观点和经验。方法:我们对参与者进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们的远程医疗经验。参与者包括说英语和西班牙语的父母和年轻人(18-21岁),他们在2021年3月15日至2022年12月31日期间在两家儿科初级保健诊所进行了远程医疗访问,这些诊所的患者主要是医疗补助保险。采用定性描述设计来制定分类。获得频率以确定最普遍的主题。结果:共访谈26人,其中家长22人,青年4人。12人(46%)说英语,14人(53%)说西班牙语。确定了四个领域,每个领域进一步分类为主题:访问前期望(亲自访问的选择,一般预期和具体担忧),访问体验(一般情绪,技术和护理质量),舒适度(整体过程,隐私和沟通),以及对远程医疗的感受(优势,劣势和远程医疗的损失)。虽然许多参与者在预约之前对远程医疗抱有负面期望,但大多数人表示了积极的就诊经历,并担心未来在家远程医疗就诊可能不再包括在他们的健康保险之内。讨论:大多数与会者指出了远程医疗的积极经验,并认为如果无法获得远程医疗会产生负面影响。与感知护理质量、优势和劣势相关的研究结果表明,在类似环境中选择就诊方式时,应考虑患者的偏好和个人情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信