A Novel Integrated Geriatric Services Hub for Frailty Identification and Comprehensive Management of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Singapore: Impact on Health Service Utilization.
Grace Sum, Robin Wai Munn Choo, Ze Ling Nai, Siew Fong Goh, Wee Shiong Lim, Yew Yoong Ding, Woan Shin Tan
{"title":"A Novel Integrated Geriatric Services Hub for Frailty Identification and Comprehensive Management of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Singapore: Impact on Health Service Utilization.","authors":"Grace Sum, Robin Wai Munn Choo, Ze Ling Nai, Siew Fong Goh, Wee Shiong Lim, Yew Yoong Ding, Woan Shin Tan","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare systems need to address the high healthcare use of frail older adults. The Geriatric Services Hub (GSH) is a novel program in Singapore that delivers frailty screening, comprehensive geriatric assessment and coordinated care for community-dwelling older persons with bio-psycho-social needs. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the GSH on healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared healthcare utilization of 634 GSH participants with 634 unique propensity score-matched non-GSH community-dwelling older adults at 12 months before and after GSH enrolment. Baseline matching covariates included demographics, socioeconomic status, disease burden, calendar quarter of enrolment, and past healthcare utilization. We did exact matching on frailty categories (Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) score 4, 5, and 6-7). Difference-in-differences technique was used to derive effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, baseline covariates were adequately balanced. Healthcare utilization declined in both groups after GSH enrolment. Relative to the comparators and after accounting for pre-enrolment differences, participation in the GSH was associated with greater primary care (mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI-0.64 to 0.77) and specialist outpatient clinic visits (mean difference: 0.42, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.13), and fewer emergency department visits (mean difference: -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.34). However, these effects did not reach statistical significance. While number of hospitalizations did not differ between the groups, cumulative length of stay differed by 1.15 bed-days and was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were observed within CFS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GSH was not associated with significant reductions in healthcare use in the first year of enrolment. Higher utilization of primary care and specialist outpatient clinic services could reflect the increased identification of care needs with the potential to reduce unnecessary healthcare use such as emergency department visits. Prospective studies with a longer follow-up would ascertain if the GSH translates to reduced healthcare utilization as hypothesized.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Healthcare systems need to address the high healthcare use of frail older adults. The Geriatric Services Hub (GSH) is a novel program in Singapore that delivers frailty screening, comprehensive geriatric assessment and coordinated care for community-dwelling older persons with bio-psycho-social needs. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the GSH on healthcare use.
Methods: We compared healthcare utilization of 634 GSH participants with 634 unique propensity score-matched non-GSH community-dwelling older adults at 12 months before and after GSH enrolment. Baseline matching covariates included demographics, socioeconomic status, disease burden, calendar quarter of enrolment, and past healthcare utilization. We did exact matching on frailty categories (Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) score 4, 5, and 6-7). Difference-in-differences technique was used to derive effect estimates.
Results: After propensity score matching, baseline covariates were adequately balanced. Healthcare utilization declined in both groups after GSH enrolment. Relative to the comparators and after accounting for pre-enrolment differences, participation in the GSH was associated with greater primary care (mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI-0.64 to 0.77) and specialist outpatient clinic visits (mean difference: 0.42, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.13), and fewer emergency department visits (mean difference: -0.18, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.34). However, these effects did not reach statistical significance. While number of hospitalizations did not differ between the groups, cumulative length of stay differed by 1.15 bed-days and was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were observed within CFS groups.
Conclusion: GSH was not associated with significant reductions in healthcare use in the first year of enrolment. Higher utilization of primary care and specialist outpatient clinic services could reflect the increased identification of care needs with the potential to reduce unnecessary healthcare use such as emergency department visits. Prospective studies with a longer follow-up would ascertain if the GSH translates to reduced healthcare utilization as hypothesized.
背景:医疗保健系统需要解决体弱老年人的高医疗保健使用问题。老年服务中心(GSH)是新加坡的一个新项目,为有生物心理社会需求的社区老年人提供虚弱筛查、综合老年评估和协调护理。我们的目的是评估谷胱甘肽对医疗保健使用的影响。方法:我们比较了634名GSH参与者和634名独特倾向评分匹配的非GSH社区老年人在GSH入组前后12个月的医疗保健利用情况。基线匹配协变量包括人口统计学、社会经济地位、疾病负担、登记的日历季度和过去的医疗保健利用情况。我们对虚弱类别(临床虚弱评分(CFS)评分4,5和6-7)进行了精确匹配。采用差中差法对效果进行估计。结果:倾向评分匹配后,基线协变量得到充分平衡。GSH入组后,两组的医疗保健利用率均有所下降。相对于比较组,在考虑入组前的差异后,GSH的参与与更多的初级保健(平均差异:0.06,95% CI-0.64至0.77)和专科门诊就诊(平均差异:0.42,95% CI -0.29至1.13)和更少的急诊科就诊(平均差异:-0.18,95% CI -0.69至0.34)相关。然而,这些影响没有达到统计学意义。虽然两组之间的住院次数没有差异,但累计住院时间相差1.15个住院日,没有统计学意义。CFS组间无统计学差异。结论:谷胱甘肽与入组第一年医疗保健使用的显著减少无关。初级保健和专科门诊服务使用率的提高可能反映出对护理需求的进一步认识,从而有可能减少不必要的医疗保健使用,如急诊就诊。长期随访的前瞻性研究将确定谷胱甘肽是否如假设的那样转化为降低医疗保健利用率。