Exploring Paramedicine Models of Care: A Novel Macro Analysis Using the RESPIGHT Framework

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Anthony Weber, Scott Devenish, Louisa Lam
{"title":"Exploring Paramedicine Models of Care: A Novel Macro Analysis Using the RESPIGHT Framework","authors":"Anthony Weber,&nbsp;Scott Devenish,&nbsp;Louisa Lam","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the alignment of undergraduate paramedicine curricula in Australia with the RESPIGHT model, focusing on diverse aspects such as emergency response, community engagement and governance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Deductive thematic analysis was conducted to assess the alignment of curricula from 16 Australian universities with the RESPIGHT framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>The study reviewed undergraduate pre-registration paramedicine programmes across Australian universities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>The study included a comprehensive analysis of curricula from 16 universities offering undergraduate paramedicine programmes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measure</h3>\n \n <p>The degree of alignment of paramedicine curricula with the RESPIGHT categories: emergency response, community engagement, situated practice, primary healthcare, integration with health services, governance, leadership and treatment and transport.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed varying degrees of alignment across the RESPIGHT categories, with notable discrepancies in areas such as community engagement and governance. Some universities demonstrated strong alignment in emergency response and treatment, while others showed weaker integration with primary healthcare and community engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights significant disparities in the preparedness of paramedicine students for the broad scope of practice required in modern healthcare. The findings underscore the need for curriculum reform to better prepare students for community care models and the evolving healthcare landscape, ensuring a more comprehensive and integrated approach to paramedicine education in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the alignment of undergraduate paramedicine curricula in Australia with the RESPIGHT model, focusing on diverse aspects such as emergency response, community engagement and governance.

Design

Deductive thematic analysis was conducted to assess the alignment of curricula from 16 Australian universities with the RESPIGHT framework.

Setting

The study reviewed undergraduate pre-registration paramedicine programmes across Australian universities.

Participants

The study included a comprehensive analysis of curricula from 16 universities offering undergraduate paramedicine programmes.

Main Outcome Measure

The degree of alignment of paramedicine curricula with the RESPIGHT categories: emergency response, community engagement, situated practice, primary healthcare, integration with health services, governance, leadership and treatment and transport.

Results

The analysis revealed varying degrees of alignment across the RESPIGHT categories, with notable discrepancies in areas such as community engagement and governance. Some universities demonstrated strong alignment in emergency response and treatment, while others showed weaker integration with primary healthcare and community engagement.

Conclusion

The study highlights significant disparities in the preparedness of paramedicine students for the broad scope of practice required in modern healthcare. The findings underscore the need for curriculum reform to better prepare students for community care models and the evolving healthcare landscape, ensuring a more comprehensive and integrated approach to paramedicine education in Australia.

探索辅助医疗护理模式:使用 RESPIGHT 框架进行新颖的宏观分析。
目的:评估澳大利亚本科辅助医学课程与RESPIGHT模式的一致性,重点关注应急响应、社区参与和治理等各个方面。设计:进行演绎主题分析,以评估来自16所澳大利亚大学的课程与RESPIGHT框架的一致性。环境:该研究回顾了澳大利亚各大学的本科预注册辅助医学课程。参与者:该研究包括对16所提供本科辅助医学课程的大学的课程进行全面分析。主要成果衡量标准:辅助医学课程与RESPIGHT类别的一致程度:应急反应、社区参与、情境实践、初级保健、与保健服务的整合、治理、领导、治疗和运输。结果:分析揭示了不同RESPIGHT类别之间的一致性程度,在社区参与和治理等领域存在显著差异。一些大学在应急反应和治疗方面表现出很强的一致性,而另一些大学在初级保健和社区参与方面表现出较弱的一致性。结论:该研究突出了在现代医疗保健所需的广泛实践范围的护理医学学生的准备显著差异。研究结果强调了课程改革的必要性,以使学生更好地为社区护理模式和不断发展的医疗保健环境做好准备,确保澳大利亚的辅助医学教育采取更全面和综合的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信