The association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders - data from a Swedish RCT in primary care 2009-2011.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Karin S Samsson, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maria Sandborgh, Maria E H Larsson
{"title":"The association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery in patients with musculoskeletal disorders - data from a Swedish RCT in primary care 2009-2011.","authors":"Karin S Samsson, Susanne Bernhardsson, Maria Sandborgh, Maria E H Larsson","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To understand, diagnose and treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders, psychological risk factors should be assessed, and the association between psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery should be investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery, and to examine a physiotherapist's ability to assess risk for disability in patients referred for orthopedic consultation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 192) were assessed by a physiotherapist or an orthopedic surgeon to determine the need for surgery. The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) was used to screen for psychological risk. The physiotherapist assessed psychological risk for disability based on yellow flags. Association between PBSI risk profile and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery was analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment of risk was calculated using a binary classification model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthopedic surgery was 2.28 times more likely to be considered an appropriate intervention for patients with a high PBSI risk profile (95% CI 1.09;4.78). The physiotherapist's risk assessment correctly identified 88% of those at low risk (specificity) and 32% of those at high risk for disability (sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that orthopedic surgery is likely to be considered appropriate for patients with a high PBSI risk profile. The high specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment implies good awareness of psychological factors. The low sensitivity suggests a need for using a screening tool such as the PBSI, to guide management decisions.<b>Trial registration</b>: Clinical Trials NCT02265172, retrospectively registered June 10, 2014.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2448709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To understand, diagnose and treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders, psychological risk factors should be assessed, and the association between psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery should be investigated.

Purpose: To investigate the association between screened psychological risk for disability and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery, and to examine a physiotherapist's ability to assess risk for disability in patients referred for orthopedic consultation.

Method: Patients (n = 192) were assessed by a physiotherapist or an orthopedic surgeon to determine the need for surgery. The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) was used to screen for psychological risk. The physiotherapist assessed psychological risk for disability based on yellow flags. Association between PBSI risk profile and appropriateness of orthopedic surgery was analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment of risk was calculated using a binary classification model.

Results: Orthopedic surgery was 2.28 times more likely to be considered an appropriate intervention for patients with a high PBSI risk profile (95% CI 1.09;4.78). The physiotherapist's risk assessment correctly identified 88% of those at low risk (specificity) and 32% of those at high risk for disability (sensitivity).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that orthopedic surgery is likely to be considered appropriate for patients with a high PBSI risk profile. The high specificity of the physiotherapist's assessment implies good awareness of psychological factors. The low sensitivity suggests a need for using a screening tool such as the PBSI, to guide management decisions.Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT02265172, retrospectively registered June 10, 2014.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信