Comprehensive Genome Profiling-Initiated Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring for Patients With Advanced Cancer.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1111/cas.16446
Taiga Sasaki, Hayato Hiraki, Akiko Yashima-Abo, Hiromi Nagashima, Fumitaka Endo, Mizunori Yaegashi, Shimpei Miura, Keiko Obata, Naoki Yanagawa, Hiroaki Itamochi, Hidekazu Shirota, Takeshi Iwaya, Satoshi S Nishizuka
{"title":"Comprehensive Genome Profiling-Initiated Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring for Patients With Advanced Cancer.","authors":"Taiga Sasaki, Hayato Hiraki, Akiko Yashima-Abo, Hiromi Nagashima, Fumitaka Endo, Mizunori Yaegashi, Shimpei Miura, Keiko Obata, Naoki Yanagawa, Hiroaki Itamochi, Hidekazu Shirota, Takeshi Iwaya, Satoshi S Nishizuka","doi":"10.1111/cas.16446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) as a companion diagnostic (CDx) has been covered by public insurance since June 2019, but the proportion of patients with cancer who actually received drug therapy based on CGP data is low. In the present study, we attempted to use CGP as a starting point for tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring. We retrospectively validated 219 patients with malignant tumors who underwent CGP at Iwate Medical University Hospital between October 2019 and April 2023 in terms of patient demographics, genetic analysis, drug recommendations, and drug administration rate. The 219 cancer cases analyzed by CGP for 27 target organs, including prostate (n = 27, 12.3%), colorectal (n = 25, 11.4%), lung (n = 19, 8.7%), and other neoplasms (n = 148, 67.6%). Among the cohort, only 14 cases (6.4%) subsequently were able to undertake the recommended action by Molecular Tumor Board. Of patients who underwent ctDNA monitoring based on somatic mutations identified by CGP (n = 11), clinical validity was confirmed in terms of early relapse prediction (n = 5, 45.5%), treatment response evaluation (n = 10, 90.9%), and no relapse/regrowth corroboration (n = 2, 18.2%) whereas 90.9% (n = 10) of patients obtained information with at least one source of the clinical validity. Although the current rate of CGP contributing to a drug recommendation is low, CGP results can be an alternate resource for tumor-informed longitudinal ctDNA monitoring to provide information concerning early relapse prediction, treatment response evaluation, and no relapse/regrowth corroboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48943,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.16446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Japan, comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) as a companion diagnostic (CDx) has been covered by public insurance since June 2019, but the proportion of patients with cancer who actually received drug therapy based on CGP data is low. In the present study, we attempted to use CGP as a starting point for tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring. We retrospectively validated 219 patients with malignant tumors who underwent CGP at Iwate Medical University Hospital between October 2019 and April 2023 in terms of patient demographics, genetic analysis, drug recommendations, and drug administration rate. The 219 cancer cases analyzed by CGP for 27 target organs, including prostate (n = 27, 12.3%), colorectal (n = 25, 11.4%), lung (n = 19, 8.7%), and other neoplasms (n = 148, 67.6%). Among the cohort, only 14 cases (6.4%) subsequently were able to undertake the recommended action by Molecular Tumor Board. Of patients who underwent ctDNA monitoring based on somatic mutations identified by CGP (n = 11), clinical validity was confirmed in terms of early relapse prediction (n = 5, 45.5%), treatment response evaluation (n = 10, 90.9%), and no relapse/regrowth corroboration (n = 2, 18.2%) whereas 90.9% (n = 10) of patients obtained information with at least one source of the clinical validity. Although the current rate of CGP contributing to a drug recommendation is low, CGP results can be an alternate resource for tumor-informed longitudinal ctDNA monitoring to provide information concerning early relapse prediction, treatment response evaluation, and no relapse/regrowth corroboration.

晚期癌症患者循环肿瘤DNA监测的全面基因组分析启动。
在日本,自2019年6月以来,综合基因组分析(CGP)作为伴随诊断(CDx)已被纳入公共保险,但实际接受基于CGP数据的药物治疗的癌症患者比例很低。在本研究中,我们试图使用CGP作为肿瘤知情循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)监测的起点。我们回顾性验证了2019年10月至2023年4月期间在岩手医科大学医院接受CGP治疗的219例恶性肿瘤患者,包括患者人口统计学、遗传分析、药物推荐和药物给药率。219例肿瘤采用CGP分析27个靶器官,包括前列腺(n = 27例,12.3%)、结直肠癌(n = 25例,11.4%)、肺癌(n = 19例,8.7%)和其他肿瘤(n = 148例,67.6%)。在队列中,只有14例(6.4%)随后能够采取分子肿瘤委员会推荐的行动。在基于CGP鉴定的体细胞突变进行ctDNA监测的患者(n = 11)中,临床有效性在早期复发预测(n = 5, 45.5%)、治疗反应评估(n = 10, 90.9%)和无复发/再生确证(n = 2, 18.2%)方面得到证实,而90.9% (n = 10)的患者获得了至少一个临床有效性来源的信息。虽然目前CGP对药物推荐的贡献率很低,但CGP结果可以作为肿瘤信息纵向ctDNA监测的替代资源,提供有关早期复发预测、治疗反应评估和无复发/再生长证实的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信