Validating the revised Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities Scale with health care professionals.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nazanin M Heydarian, Scott D Frankowski, Moonju Lee, Kyeung Mi Oh, Kyungeh An, Chanam Shin, Allyson S Hughes, Rishika Kartik, Kathleen R Bogart
{"title":"Validating the revised Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities Scale with health care professionals.","authors":"Nazanin M Heydarian, Scott D Frankowski, Moonju Lee, Kyeung Mi Oh, Kyungeh An, Chanam Shin, Allyson S Hughes, Rishika Kartik, Kathleen R Bogart","doi":"10.1037/rep0000594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Disability stigma has been linked with adverse chronic and acute health outcomes in people with disabilities. The present study updated the widely used Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons measure (to the revised Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities [ATPD] scale) among health care professionals and validated the measure using a disability stigma framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey with 272 health care professionals and students was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analyses revealed that men, compared to women and nonbinary people, scored higher on disability stigma. Quality of contact, but not quantity of contact nor disability status was associated with less stigmatized attitudes. Those who scored higher on agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness also scored lower on stigmatizing attitudes about people with disabilities. Furthermore, psychological inflexibility, social dominance orientation, and authoritarianism were all positive predictors of stigmatizing attitudes about people with disabilities. Finally, we found that medical model endorsement, but not social model endorsement positively predicted stigmatizing attitudes as measured by the revised ATPD scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings validate the revised ATPD scale and illuminate disability stigma as expressed by a diverse sample of health care professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Disability stigma has been linked with adverse chronic and acute health outcomes in people with disabilities. The present study updated the widely used Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons measure (to the revised Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities [ATPD] scale) among health care professionals and validated the measure using a disability stigma framework.

Design: A survey with 272 health care professionals and students was conducted.

Results: Regression analyses revealed that men, compared to women and nonbinary people, scored higher on disability stigma. Quality of contact, but not quantity of contact nor disability status was associated with less stigmatized attitudes. Those who scored higher on agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness also scored lower on stigmatizing attitudes about people with disabilities. Furthermore, psychological inflexibility, social dominance orientation, and authoritarianism were all positive predictors of stigmatizing attitudes about people with disabilities. Finally, we found that medical model endorsement, but not social model endorsement positively predicted stigmatizing attitudes as measured by the revised ATPD scale.

Conclusion: Our findings validate the revised ATPD scale and illuminate disability stigma as expressed by a diverse sample of health care professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

卫生保健专业人员对修订后的残疾人态度量表的验证。
目的:残疾耻辱感与残疾人的不良慢性和急性健康结果有关。本研究在卫生保健专业人员中更新了广泛使用的对残疾人的态度量表(修订后的对残疾人的态度量表),并使用残疾污名框架验证了该量表。设计:对272名卫生保健专业人员和学生进行调查。结果:回归分析显示,与女性和非二元性别人群相比,男性在残疾耻辱感上得分更高。接触的质量,而不是接触的数量或残疾状况与较少被污名化的态度有关。那些在亲和性、开放性和尽责性方面得分较高的人在对残疾人的污名化态度方面得分也较低。此外,心理不灵活性、社会支配倾向和权威主义都是对残疾人污名化态度的正向预测因子。最后,我们发现医学模式认可正向预测污名化态度,而非社会模式认可正向预测污名化态度。结论:我们的研究结果验证了修订后的ATPD量表,并阐明了不同医疗保健专业人员所表达的残疾耻辱感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信