Prognostic significance of body mass index in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line therapies.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Keigo Sato, Kosuke Takemura, Ryosuke Oki, Tetsuya Urasaki, Yusuke Yoneoka, Ryo Fujiwara, Yosuke Yasuda, Tomohiko Oguchi, Noboru Numao, Shinya Yamamoto, Junji Yonese, Haruki Kume, Takeshi Yuasa
{"title":"Prognostic significance of body mass index in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line therapies.","authors":"Keigo Sato, Kosuke Takemura, Ryosuke Oki, Tetsuya Urasaki, Yusuke Yoneoka, Ryo Fujiwara, Yosuke Yasuda, Tomohiko Oguchi, Noboru Numao, Shinya Yamamoto, Junji Yonese, Haruki Kume, Takeshi Yuasa","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Higher body mass index (BMI) is reportedly associated with improved prognosis of patients with various cancers. However, it is unclear whether this phenomenon, also known as the obesity paradox, applies to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of BMI in patients with mRCC receiving first-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients with mRCC receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from systemic therapy initiation to death from any cause or last follow-up. Baseline patient characteristics were compared by Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test. OS curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and were compared by log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was performed via Cox proportional-hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 183 patients included, 130 (71 %) were overweight (≥22 and 18 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in men and women, respectively), and 63 (34 %) received ICI-based combination therapy. There was a significantly higher proportion of men in the overweight subgroup (87 % versus 64 %; P = 0.002). During the study period, 97 patients died, and median (95 % confidence interval) OS was 39.0 months (31.5-66.3 months) and 28.1 months (17.6-39.7 months) in overweight and normoweight patients, respectively (P = 0.015). On multivariable analysis, overweight was independently associated with longer OS (HR 0.57; P = 0.014). Subgroup analyses of patients receiving ICI-based combination therapy yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overweight is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving first-line therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Higher body mass index (BMI) is reportedly associated with improved prognosis of patients with various cancers. However, it is unclear whether this phenomenon, also known as the obesity paradox, applies to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of BMI in patients with mRCC receiving first-line therapies.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with mRCC receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from systemic therapy initiation to death from any cause or last follow-up. Baseline patient characteristics were compared by Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test. OS curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and were compared by log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was performed via Cox proportional-hazards regression.

Results: Of the 183 patients included, 130 (71 %) were overweight (≥22 and 18 kg/m2 in men and women, respectively), and 63 (34 %) received ICI-based combination therapy. There was a significantly higher proportion of men in the overweight subgroup (87 % versus 64 %; P = 0.002). During the study period, 97 patients died, and median (95 % confidence interval) OS was 39.0 months (31.5-66.3 months) and 28.1 months (17.6-39.7 months) in overweight and normoweight patients, respectively (P = 0.015). On multivariable analysis, overweight was independently associated with longer OS (HR 0.57; P = 0.014). Subgroup analyses of patients receiving ICI-based combination therapy yielded similar results.

Conclusion: Overweight is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving first-line therapies.

接受一线治疗的转移性肾癌患者体重指数的预后意义。
目的:据报道,较高的身体质量指数(BMI)与各种癌症患者的预后改善有关。然而,尚不清楚这种现象,也被称为肥胖悖论,是否适用于转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)。我们的目的是确定BMI在接受一线治疗的mRCC患者中的预后意义。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了接受一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合治疗或酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗的mRCC患者。总生存期(OS)定义为从全身治疗开始到任何原因死亡或最后一次随访的时间。基线患者特征比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验或Fisher精确检验。OS曲线采用Kaplan-Meier估计构建,采用log-rank检验比较。采用Cox比例风险回归进行多变量分析。结果:纳入的183例患者中,130例(71 %)超重(男性≥22 kg/m2,女性≥18 kg/m2), 63例(34 %)接受了以ici为基础的联合治疗。超重亚组中男性的比例明显更高(87 % vs 64 %; = 0.002页)。在研究期间,有97例患者死亡,超重和正常体重患者的中位生存期(95% %置信区间)分别为39.0个月(31.5-66.3个月)和28.1个月(17.6-39.7个月)(P = 0.015)。在多变量分析中,超重与较长的生存期独立相关(HR 0.57; = 0.014页)。接受以ici为基础的联合治疗的患者的亚组分析也得到了类似的结果。结论:超重与接受一线治疗的mRCC患者预后良好相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信