The Maternal and Neonatal Glycemic Stress Response in Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Comparative Study Between Epidural and Parenteral Opioids Analgesia.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S499370
Ala A Alhowary, Omar Altal, Diab Bani Hani, Anas Alrusan, Yaser Saleh Ba Jusair, Rania Al-Bataineh, Ahmed Al Sharie, Abdelwahab Aleshawi
{"title":"The Maternal and Neonatal Glycemic Stress Response in Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Comparative Study Between Epidural and Parenteral Opioids Analgesia.","authors":"Ala A Alhowary, Omar Altal, Diab Bani Hani, Anas Alrusan, Yaser Saleh Ba Jusair, Rania Al-Bataineh, Ahmed Al Sharie, Abdelwahab Aleshawi","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S499370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been recognized that the type of anesthetic and analgesic technique and the relative pain degree may have an influence on hyperglycemic-stress response to surgery. This comparative study aimed to assess glucose levels in both mothers and infants during normal vaginal delivery. This study aimed to investigate this stress response between mothers who received parenteral analgesia versus epidural analgesia (EA) as an objective reflection for pain response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and seventeen patients participated in this prospective comparative study. They were categorized into two groups: parenteral analgesia group (who received subcutaneous morphine) and EA group. The primary outcome was to measure the difference in blood glucose level before delivery (at 3 cm cervical dilation), at full dilation, and at the third stage of labor and compare these values between both groups. The secondary outcome was to assess the factors affecting the glycemic stress response in mothers and neonates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change in maternal glucose level at full dilation and after delivery were significantly lower in the EA group. Neonatal glucose levels were not significantly different between the two groups. The change in maternal glucose level was influenced by the number of gravity and miscarriages. Neonatal glucose levels were associated with the gestational age of delivery, birth weight, and maternal glucose level at full cervical dilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EA appears superior to parenteral opioids analgesia, providing better pain management and subsequent lower stress response levels for mothers during vaginal delivery. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of analgesia during labor to optimize maternal well-being. Optimizing maternal factors (such as glycemic response) and neonatal factors (such as prematurity and birth weight) may influence the stress response of the neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"17 ","pages":"117-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S499370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has been recognized that the type of anesthetic and analgesic technique and the relative pain degree may have an influence on hyperglycemic-stress response to surgery. This comparative study aimed to assess glucose levels in both mothers and infants during normal vaginal delivery. This study aimed to investigate this stress response between mothers who received parenteral analgesia versus epidural analgesia (EA) as an objective reflection for pain response.

Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients participated in this prospective comparative study. They were categorized into two groups: parenteral analgesia group (who received subcutaneous morphine) and EA group. The primary outcome was to measure the difference in blood glucose level before delivery (at 3 cm cervical dilation), at full dilation, and at the third stage of labor and compare these values between both groups. The secondary outcome was to assess the factors affecting the glycemic stress response in mothers and neonates.

Results: The change in maternal glucose level at full dilation and after delivery were significantly lower in the EA group. Neonatal glucose levels were not significantly different between the two groups. The change in maternal glucose level was influenced by the number of gravity and miscarriages. Neonatal glucose levels were associated with the gestational age of delivery, birth weight, and maternal glucose level at full cervical dilation.

Conclusion: EA appears superior to parenteral opioids analgesia, providing better pain management and subsequent lower stress response levels for mothers during vaginal delivery. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of analgesia during labor to optimize maternal well-being. Optimizing maternal factors (such as glycemic response) and neonatal factors (such as prematurity and birth weight) may influence the stress response of the neonates.

正常阴道分娩中产妇和新生儿血糖应激反应:硬膜外和静脉注射阿片类镇痛的比较研究。
背景:已经认识到麻醉和镇痛技术的类型和相对疼痛程度可能对手术后高血糖应激反应有影响。这项比较研究旨在评估正常阴道分娩期间母亲和婴儿的血糖水平。本研究旨在探讨接受肠外镇痛和硬膜外镇痛(EA)的母亲之间的应激反应,作为疼痛反应的客观反映。方法:117例患者参与前瞻性比较研究。将患者分为肠外镇痛组(皮下注射吗啡)和EA组。主要结果是测量分娩前(宫颈扩张3cm时)、完全扩张时和产程第三阶段的血糖水平差异,并比较两组之间的这些值。次要结果是评估影响母亲和新生儿血糖应激反应的因素。结果:EA组孕妇全扩张期及分娩后血糖变化均明显降低。两组新生儿血糖水平无显著差异。孕妇血糖水平的变化受妊娠次数和流产次数的影响。新生儿血糖水平与分娩胎龄、出生体重和宫颈完全扩张时母体血糖水平相关。结论:EA似乎优于静脉注射阿片类镇痛,为阴道分娩的母亲提供更好的疼痛管理和随后更低的应激反应水平。这些发现强调了在分娩过程中选择镇痛的重要性,以优化产妇的健康。优化母体因素(如血糖反应)和新生儿因素(如早产和出生体重)可能会影响新生儿的应激反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信