Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Older Adults or Adults With Disability With Migraine.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seonkyeong Yang, Yulia Orlova, Haesuk Park, Steven M Smith, Yi Guo, Benjamin A Chapin, Debbie L Wilson, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic
{"title":"Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Older Adults or Adults With Disability With Migraine.","authors":"Seonkyeong Yang, Yulia Orlova, Haesuk Park, Steven M Smith, Yi Guo, Benjamin A Chapin, Debbie L Wilson, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) offer effective migraine-specific preventive treatment. However, concerns exist about their potential cardiovascular risks due to CGRP blockade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Medicare beneficiaries with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP-mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA in the US.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective, sequential cohort study was conducted among a nationally representative population-based sample of Medicare claims from May 2018 through December 2020. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2023. This study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 18 years or older with migraine who initiated either anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA. Beneficiaries who had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cluster headache, malignant cancer, or hospice service within a 1-year baseline period prior to treatment initiation were excluded. To minimize channeling bias from new drug introductions and time-related bias due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 5 cohorts were established, representing sequential 6-month calendar intervals based on the initial prescription or date of index anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA use.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Anti-CGRP mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was time to first MI or stroke. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive crisis, peripheral revascularization, and Raynaud phenomenon. The inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 266 848 eligible patients with migraine, 5153 patients initiated anti-CGRP mAbs (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [14.0] years; 4308 female patients [83.6%]) and 4000 patients initiated onabotulinumtoxinA (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.7] years; 3353 female patients [83.8%]). Use of anti-CGRP mAbs was not associated with an increased risk of composite CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.77), hypertensive crisis (aHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.14-1.55), peripheral revascularization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.48-4.73), or Raynaud phenomenon (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45-1.24) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. Subgroup analyses by age group and presence of established non-MI or stroke CVD showed similar findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, despite initial concerns regarding the cardiovascular effects of CGRP blockade, anti-CGRP mAbs were not associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with onabotulinumtoxinA among adult Medicare beneficiaries with migraine, who were predominantly older adults or individuals with disability. Future studies with longer follow-up periods and in other populations are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":"132-141"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) offer effective migraine-specific preventive treatment. However, concerns exist about their potential cardiovascular risks due to CGRP blockade.

Objective: To compare the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Medicare beneficiaries with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP-mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA in the US.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, sequential cohort study was conducted among a nationally representative population-based sample of Medicare claims from May 2018 through December 2020. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2023. This study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 18 years or older with migraine who initiated either anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA. Beneficiaries who had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cluster headache, malignant cancer, or hospice service within a 1-year baseline period prior to treatment initiation were excluded. To minimize channeling bias from new drug introductions and time-related bias due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 5 cohorts were established, representing sequential 6-month calendar intervals based on the initial prescription or date of index anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA use.

Exposure: Anti-CGRP mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was time to first MI or stroke. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive crisis, peripheral revascularization, and Raynaud phenomenon. The inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.

Results: Among 266 848 eligible patients with migraine, 5153 patients initiated anti-CGRP mAbs (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [14.0] years; 4308 female patients [83.6%]) and 4000 patients initiated onabotulinumtoxinA (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.7] years; 3353 female patients [83.8%]). Use of anti-CGRP mAbs was not associated with an increased risk of composite CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.77), hypertensive crisis (aHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.14-1.55), peripheral revascularization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.48-4.73), or Raynaud phenomenon (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45-1.24) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. Subgroup analyses by age group and presence of established non-MI or stroke CVD showed similar findings.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, despite initial concerns regarding the cardiovascular effects of CGRP blockade, anti-CGRP mAbs were not associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with onabotulinumtoxinA among adult Medicare beneficiaries with migraine, who were predominantly older adults or individuals with disability. Future studies with longer follow-up periods and in other populations are needed to confirm these findings.

抗cgrp单克隆抗体在老年或残疾偏头痛患者中的心血管安全性
重要性:针对降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)或其受体(抗CGRP单克隆抗体)的单克隆抗体(mab)提供了有效的偏头痛特异性预防治疗。然而,由于CGRP阻断,存在潜在的心血管风险。目的:比较在美国开始使用抗cgrp - mab和单抗肉毒杆菌毒素的偏头痛医疗保险受益人之间心血管疾病(CVD)的发生率。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性、顺序队列研究是在2018年5月至2020年12月期间,在全国具有代表性的医疗保险索赔样本中进行的。数据分析时间为2023年8月至12月。这项研究纳入了18岁或以上的偏头痛患者,他们接受了抗cgrp单克隆抗体或肉毒杆菌毒素治疗。在治疗开始前的1年基线期内有心肌梗死(MI)、中风、丛集性头痛、恶性癌症或安宁疗护服务史的受益人被排除在外。为了最大限度地减少新药引入带来的通道偏倚和COVID-19大流行造成的时间相关偏倚,建立了5个队列,根据初始处方或指数抗- cgrp单克隆抗体或肉毒杆菌毒素使用日期,代表连续6个月的日历间隔。暴露:抗cgrp单克隆抗体vs肉毒杆菌毒素。主要结局和评价指标:主要结局指标为首次心肌梗死或卒中发生时间。次要结局包括高血压危象、外周血运重建术和雷诺现象。采用治疗加权Cox比例风险模型的逆概率来比较两个治疗组的结果。结果:在266 848例符合条件的偏头痛患者中,5153例患者启动了抗cgrp单克隆抗体(平均[SD]年龄57.8[14.0]岁;4308名女性患者(83.6%)和4000名患者开始服用肉毒杆菌毒素(平均[SD]年龄61.9[13.7]岁;女性3353例[83.8%])。使用抗cgrp单克隆抗体与复合心血管事件的风险增加无关(校正风险比[aHR], 0.88;95% CI, 0.44-1.77),高血压危象(aHR, 0.46;95% CI, 0.14-1.55),外周血运重建术(aHR, 1.50;95% CI, 0.48-4.73)或雷诺现象(aHR, 0.75;95% CI, 0.45-1.24)与肉毒杆菌毒素相比。亚组分析按年龄分组和是否存在已确定的非心肌梗死或卒中CVD显示相似的结果。结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,尽管最初关注CGRP阻断对心血管的影响,但在偏头痛的成年医疗保险受益人中,抗CGRP单克隆抗体与单肉毒杆菌毒素相比,与CVD风险增加无关,这些受益人主要是老年人或残疾人。需要对其他人群进行更长随访期的后续研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信