Proposal for novel definition of radiologically less-invasive clinical stage IA solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma using the maximum standardized uptake value.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yukio Watanabe, Aritoshi Hattori, Mariko Fukui, Takeshi Matsunaga, Kazuya Takamochi, Kenji Suzuki
{"title":"Proposal for novel definition of radiologically less-invasive clinical stage IA solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma using the maximum standardized uptake value.","authors":"Yukio Watanabe, Aritoshi Hattori, Mariko Fukui, Takeshi Matsunaga, Kazuya Takamochi, Kenji Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s11748-024-02115-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of defining new imaging criteria to predict less-invasive clinical (c)-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as the cutoff value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive 364 patients who underwent anatomical resection with mediastinal lymphadenectomy and positron emission tomography for c-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma with a tumor diameter < 3 cm were retrospectively evaluated. Less-invasive cancer was defined as the absence of nodal involvement, lymphovascular or pleural invasion, or spread through air spaces. The SUVmax cutoff value was determined based on the specificity of the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>228 were pure-solid tumors, and 136 were part-solid tumors. 212 were c-stage IA2 and 152 were c-stage IA3. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 33.0% and 97.6%, respectively, and it was possible to secure the sensitivity by more than 30% with high specificity among the solid predominant tumors. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 40.7% and 95.7%, respectively, in whole tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm, and 27.0% and 99.0%, respectively in whole tumor diameter between 2 and 3 cm. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 45.8% and 96.6%, respectively, in part-solid tumors, and 17.8% and 97.8%, respectively in pure-solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Setting the SUVmax as cutoff value could predict pathologically less-invasive cancers in c-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02115-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of defining new imaging criteria to predict less-invasive clinical (c)-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as the cutoff value.

Methods: Consecutive 364 patients who underwent anatomical resection with mediastinal lymphadenectomy and positron emission tomography for c-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma with a tumor diameter < 3 cm were retrospectively evaluated. Less-invasive cancer was defined as the absence of nodal involvement, lymphovascular or pleural invasion, or spread through air spaces. The SUVmax cutoff value was determined based on the specificity of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: 228 were pure-solid tumors, and 136 were part-solid tumors. 212 were c-stage IA2 and 152 were c-stage IA3. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 33.0% and 97.6%, respectively, and it was possible to secure the sensitivity by more than 30% with high specificity among the solid predominant tumors. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 40.7% and 95.7%, respectively, in whole tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm, and 27.0% and 99.0%, respectively in whole tumor diameter between 2 and 3 cm. When the SUVmax was set at a cutoff value of 2.2, sensitivity and specificity were 45.8% and 96.6%, respectively, in part-solid tumors, and 17.8% and 97.8%, respectively in pure-solid tumors.

Conclusion: Setting the SUVmax as cutoff value could predict pathologically less-invasive cancers in c-stage IA2-IA3 solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

建议使用最大标准化摄取值来定义放射学上低侵袭性临床IA期实性显性肺腺癌。
目的:本研究旨在评估以最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)作为临界值,定义新的影像学标准来预测临床(c)期IA2-IA3实性显性肺腺癌的可能性。方法:连续364例c期IA2-IA3型肺实性显性腺癌患者行解剖切除、纵隔淋巴结切除术和正电子发射断层扫描。结果:纯实体瘤228例,部分实体瘤136例。c期IA2 212例,c期IA3 152例。当SUVmax设为截断值2.2时,敏感性和特异性分别为33.0%和97.6%,在实体优势肿瘤中,敏感性可达30%以上,特异性高。SUVmax设截断值2.2时,对肿瘤全径≤2cm的敏感性为40.7%,特异度为95.7%;对肿瘤全径2 ~ 3cm的敏感性为27.0%,特异度为99.0%。当SUVmax临界值为2.2时,部分实体瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为45.8%和96.6%,纯实体瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为17.8%和97.8%。结论:以SUVmax为临界值可预测c期IA2-IA3实性显性肺腺癌的病理低侵袭性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信