Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Roland Froetschl, J Christopher Corton, Henghong Li, Jiri Aubrecht, Scott S Auerbach, Florian Caiment, Tatyana Y Doktorova, Yurika Fujita, Danyel Jennen, Naoki Koyama, Matthew J Meier, Roman Mezencev, Leslie Recio, Takayoshi Suzuki, Carole L Yauk
{"title":"Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity.","authors":"Roland Froetschl, J Christopher Corton, Henghong Li, Jiri Aubrecht, Scott S Auerbach, Florian Caiment, Tatyana Y Doktorova, Yurika Fujita, Danyel Jennen, Naoki Koyama, Matthew J Meier, Roman Mezencev, Leslie Recio, Takayoshi Suzuki, Carole L Yauk","doi":"10.1002/em.22645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene expression biomarkers have the potential to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, providing opportunities for integrated testing and reducing animal use. In August 2022, an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) workshop was held to critically review current methods to identify genotoxicants using transcriptomic profiling. Here, we summarize the findings of the workgroup on the state of the science regarding the use of transcriptomic biomarkers to identify genotoxic chemicals in vitro and in vivo. A total of 1341 papers were examined to identify the biomarkers that show the most promise for identifying genotoxicants. This analysis revealed two independently derived in vivo biomarkers and three in vitro biomarkers that, when used in conjunction with standard computational techniques, can identify genotoxic chemicals in vivo (rat or mouse liver) or in human cells in culture using different gene expression profiling platforms, with predictive accuracies of ≥92%. These biomarkers have been validated to differing degrees but typically show high reproducibility across transcriptomic platforms and model systems. They offer several advantages for applications in different contexts of use in genotoxicity testing including: early signal detection, moderate-to-high-throughput screening capacity, adaptability to different cell types and tissues, and insights on mechanistic information on DNA-damage response. Workshop participants agreed on consensus statements to advance the regulatory adoption of transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity. The participants agreed that transcriptomic biomarkers have the potential to be used in conjunction with other biomarkers in integrated test strategies in vitro and using short-term rodent exposures to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals that may cause cancer and heritable genetic effects. Following are the consensus statements from the workgroup. Transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity can be used in Weight of Evidence (WoE) evaluation to: determine potential genotoxic mechanisms and hazards; identify misleading positives from in vitro genotoxicity assays; serve as new approach methodologies (NAMs) integrated into the standard battery of genotoxicity tests. Several transcriptomic biomarkers have been developed from sufficiently robust training data sets, validated with external test sets, and have demonstrated performance in multiple laboratories. These transcriptomic biomarkers can be used following established study designs and models designated through existing validation exercises in WoE evaluation. Bridging studies using a selection of training and test chemicals are needed to deviate from the established protocols to confirm performance when a transcriptomic biomarker is being applied in other: tissues, cell models, or gene expression platforms. Top dose selection and time of gene expression analysis are critical and should be established during transcriptomic biomarker development. These conditions are the only ones suited for transcriptomic biomarker use unless additional bridging or pharmacokinetic studies are conducted. Temporal effects for genotoxicants that operate via distinct mechanisms should be considered in data interpretation. Fixed transcriptomic biomarker gene sets and analytical processes do not need to be independently rederived in biomarker validation. Validation should focus on the performance of the gene set in external test sets. Robust external testing should ensure a minimum of additional chemicals spanning genotoxic and non-genotoxic modes of action. Genes in the transcriptomic biomarker do not need to be known to be mechanistically involved in genotoxicity responses. Existing frameworks described for NAMs could be applied for validation of transcriptomic biomarkers. Reproducibility of bioinformatic analysis is critical for the regulatory application of transcriptomic biomarkers. A bioinformatics expert should be involved with creating reproducible methods for the qualification and application of each transcriptomic biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gene expression biomarkers have the potential to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, providing opportunities for integrated testing and reducing animal use. In August 2022, an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) workshop was held to critically review current methods to identify genotoxicants using transcriptomic profiling. Here, we summarize the findings of the workgroup on the state of the science regarding the use of transcriptomic biomarkers to identify genotoxic chemicals in vitro and in vivo. A total of 1341 papers were examined to identify the biomarkers that show the most promise for identifying genotoxicants. This analysis revealed two independently derived in vivo biomarkers and three in vitro biomarkers that, when used in conjunction with standard computational techniques, can identify genotoxic chemicals in vivo (rat or mouse liver) or in human cells in culture using different gene expression profiling platforms, with predictive accuracies of ≥92%. These biomarkers have been validated to differing degrees but typically show high reproducibility across transcriptomic platforms and model systems. They offer several advantages for applications in different contexts of use in genotoxicity testing including: early signal detection, moderate-to-high-throughput screening capacity, adaptability to different cell types and tissues, and insights on mechanistic information on DNA-damage response. Workshop participants agreed on consensus statements to advance the regulatory adoption of transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity. The participants agreed that transcriptomic biomarkers have the potential to be used in conjunction with other biomarkers in integrated test strategies in vitro and using short-term rodent exposures to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals that may cause cancer and heritable genetic effects. Following are the consensus statements from the workgroup. Transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity can be used in Weight of Evidence (WoE) evaluation to: determine potential genotoxic mechanisms and hazards; identify misleading positives from in vitro genotoxicity assays; serve as new approach methodologies (NAMs) integrated into the standard battery of genotoxicity tests. Several transcriptomic biomarkers have been developed from sufficiently robust training data sets, validated with external test sets, and have demonstrated performance in multiple laboratories. These transcriptomic biomarkers can be used following established study designs and models designated through existing validation exercises in WoE evaluation. Bridging studies using a selection of training and test chemicals are needed to deviate from the established protocols to confirm performance when a transcriptomic biomarker is being applied in other: tissues, cell models, or gene expression platforms. Top dose selection and time of gene expression analysis are critical and should be established during transcriptomic biomarker development. These conditions are the only ones suited for transcriptomic biomarker use unless additional bridging or pharmacokinetic studies are conducted. Temporal effects for genotoxicants that operate via distinct mechanisms should be considered in data interpretation. Fixed transcriptomic biomarker gene sets and analytical processes do not need to be independently rederived in biomarker validation. Validation should focus on the performance of the gene set in external test sets. Robust external testing should ensure a minimum of additional chemicals spanning genotoxic and non-genotoxic modes of action. Genes in the transcriptomic biomarker do not need to be known to be mechanistically involved in genotoxicity responses. Existing frameworks described for NAMs could be applied for validation of transcriptomic biomarkers. Reproducibility of bioinformatic analysis is critical for the regulatory application of transcriptomic biomarkers. A bioinformatics expert should be involved with creating reproducible methods for the qualification and application of each transcriptomic biomarker.

国际遗传毒性测试研讨会关于使用转录组生物标志物预测遗传毒性的共识发现。
基因表达生物标志物具有识别遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物的潜力,为综合测试和减少动物使用提供了机会。2022年8月,举办了一次国际遗传毒性测试研讨会(IWGT),对目前使用转录组分析识别基因毒物的方法进行了严格审查。在这里,我们总结了工作组关于使用转录组生物标志物识别体外和体内遗传毒性化学物质的科学现状的发现。共有1341篇论文被审查,以确定最有希望识别基因毒物的生物标志物。该分析揭示了两种独立衍生的体内生物标志物和三种体外生物标志物,当与标准计算技术结合使用时,可以使用不同的基因表达谱分析平台识别体内(大鼠或小鼠肝脏)或培养的人类细胞中的遗传毒性化学物质,预测精度≥92%。这些生物标志物已经在不同程度上得到了验证,但通常在转录组学平台和模型系统中表现出很高的可重复性。它们在基因毒性测试的不同应用环境中提供了几个优势,包括:早期信号检测,中高通量筛选能力,对不同细胞类型和组织的适应性,以及对dna损伤反应机制信息的见解。研讨会参与者就共识声明达成一致,以促进基因毒性转录组生物标志物的监管采用。与会者一致认为,转录组生物标志物有潜力与其他生物标志物一起用于体外综合测试策略,并利用啮齿动物短期暴露来识别可能导致癌症和遗传性遗传效应的基因毒性和非基因毒性化学物质。以下是工作组的协商一致声明。遗传毒性的转录组生物标志物可用于证据权重(WoE)评估,以确定潜在的遗传毒性机制和危害;识别体外遗传毒性试验中误导性的阳性结果;作为新方法方法(NAMs)整合到标准的遗传毒性试验中。一些转录组生物标志物已经从足够强大的训练数据集开发出来,通过外部测试集进行验证,并在多个实验室中展示了性能。这些转录组生物标志物可以按照既定的研究设计和模型使用,这些设计和模型是通过在WoE评估中现有的验证练习指定的。当转录组生物标志物应用于其他组织、细胞模型或基因表达平台时,需要使用选择的训练和测试化学品进行桥接研究,以偏离既定的方案,以确认其性能。基因表达分析的最高剂量选择和时间至关重要,应在转录组生物标志物开发过程中确定。除非进行额外的桥接或药代动力学研究,否则这些条件是唯一适合使用转录组生物标志物的条件。在数据解释中应考虑通过不同机制作用的基因毒物的时间效应。固定的转录组生物标志物基因集和分析过程不需要在生物标志物验证中独立重新衍生。验证应侧重于基因集在外部测试集中的性能。强有力的外部测试应确保最少的额外化学品跨越基因毒性和非基因毒性的作用模式。转录组生物标志物中的基因不需要知道与遗传毒性反应有关的机制。现有的NAMs框架可以应用于转录组生物标志物的验证。生物信息学分析的可重复性对转录组生物标志物的调控应用至关重要。生物信息学专家应该参与创建可重复的方法,以确定和应用每个转录组生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信