Renal colic: Streamlining investigations to improve patient outcomes in emergency medicine

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joshua A Wren MBChB, Alison Lally FACEM, MBBS
{"title":"Renal colic: Streamlining investigations to improve patient outcomes in emergency medicine","authors":"Joshua A Wren MBChB,&nbsp;Alison Lally FACEM, MBBS","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In Australian EDs, patients experience long waits for imaging, particularly for presentations such as renal colic. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the gold-standard for renal stones, although ultrasonography is recommended for young patients and those susceptible to radiation, an approach supported by The Canberra Hospital (TCH) ED guidelines for renal colic. This audit aims to not only assess how well these guidelines are adhered to, but also to discuss possible methods of improving flow through ED and thus patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective audit was conducted using 100 attendances to TCH ED between the dates of 02/04/2022 and 15/06/2022 with the diagnosis of renal colic or calculus. Data were collected on biochemical and radiographic results and patient outcomes with the associations between these datasets statistically analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Blood tests demonstrating abnormal renal function, white cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) together with haematuria on urine analysis conferred high positive and negative predictive values (83.3% and 100%, respectively) for renal stones. Larger renal stones were associated with higher creatinine and CRP levels and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (<i>P</i> = 0.0145, <i>P</i> = 0.0062 and <i>P</i> = 0.0022, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We propose that patients with significant clinical and biochemical features of renal stones could be referred to urology earlier to await CT as an inpatient and those without be referred to their general practitioner for outpatient imaging and medical management. This could improve flow through the department and improve patient outcomes through reduced waiting times and radiation burden.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In Australian EDs, patients experience long waits for imaging, particularly for presentations such as renal colic. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the gold-standard for renal stones, although ultrasonography is recommended for young patients and those susceptible to radiation, an approach supported by The Canberra Hospital (TCH) ED guidelines for renal colic. This audit aims to not only assess how well these guidelines are adhered to, but also to discuss possible methods of improving flow through ED and thus patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective audit was conducted using 100 attendances to TCH ED between the dates of 02/04/2022 and 15/06/2022 with the diagnosis of renal colic or calculus. Data were collected on biochemical and radiographic results and patient outcomes with the associations between these datasets statistically analysed.

Results

Blood tests demonstrating abnormal renal function, white cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) together with haematuria on urine analysis conferred high positive and negative predictive values (83.3% and 100%, respectively) for renal stones. Larger renal stones were associated with higher creatinine and CRP levels and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.0145, P = 0.0062 and P = 0.0022, respectively).

Conclusions

We propose that patients with significant clinical and biochemical features of renal stones could be referred to urology earlier to await CT as an inpatient and those without be referred to their general practitioner for outpatient imaging and medical management. This could improve flow through the department and improve patient outcomes through reduced waiting times and radiation burden.

肾绞痛:简化调查以改善急诊医学患者的预后。
目的:在澳大利亚的急诊科,患者需要长时间等待影像学检查,尤其是肾绞痛。计算机断层扫描(CT)成像是肾结石的金标准,尽管超声检查推荐给年轻患者和易受辐射的患者,堪培拉医院(TCH) ED肾绞痛指南支持超声检查。这次审核的目的不仅是评估这些指南的遵守程度,而且是讨论改善急诊科血流的可能方法,从而改善患者的预后。方法:回顾性分析在2022年4月2日至2022年6月15日期间到TCH ED就诊的100例诊断为肾绞痛或结石的患者。收集生化和放射学结果以及患者预后的数据,并对这些数据集之间的关联进行统计分析。结果:血液检查显示肾功能异常,白细胞计数和c反应蛋白(CRP)以及尿液分析中的血尿为肾结石的高阳性和阴性预测值(分别为83.3%和100%)。较大的肾结石与较高的肌酐和CRP水平以及较低的肾小球滤过率相关(P = 0.0145, P = 0.0062和P = 0.0022)。结论:我们建议有明显临床和生化特征的肾结石患者可作为住院患者尽早转到泌尿科等待CT检查,而那些没有的患者可转到全科医生那里进行门诊成像和医疗管理。这可以改善整个部门的流程,并通过减少等待时间和辐射负担来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信