Exploring diagnostic stewardship in the emergency department evaluation of pediatric abdominal pain in a statewide quality collaborative.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexander T Janke, Kenneth A Michelson, Keith E Kocher, Kristian Seiler, Michelle L Macy, Michele Nypaver, Prashant V Mahajan, Rajan Arora, Courtney W Mangus
{"title":"Exploring diagnostic stewardship in the emergency department evaluation of pediatric abdominal pain in a statewide quality collaborative.","authors":"Alexander T Janke, Kenneth A Michelson, Keith E Kocher, Kristian Seiler, Michelle L Macy, Michele Nypaver, Prashant V Mahajan, Rajan Arora, Courtney W Mangus","doi":"10.1111/acem.15075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship is the effort to optimize diagnostic testing to reduce errors while avoiding overtesting and overtreatment. Abdominal pain and appendicitis in children are essential use cases. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis can be dangerous and even life-threatening, but overtesting is harmful.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 5-17 years presenting with abdominal pain to 26 EDs within the Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative (MEDIC) from May 1, 2016, to February 29, 2024. We defined two outcome measures summarized by ED. First, we describe the cross-sectional imaging:appendicitis visits ratio, defined as the count of ED visits resulting in any cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) divided by the count of ED visits with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Second, we describe the delayed diagnosis rate, defined by an ED visit for abdominal pain resulting in a discharge and subsequent return visit with a diagnosis of appendicitis within 7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 120,112 pediatric visits for abdominal pain at 26 EDs; 4967 (4.1%) were diagnosed with appendicitis. The cross-sectional imaging:appendicitis visits ratio varied by site, from as low as 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.2) at a pediatric site to as high as 7.9 (95% CI 4.8-16.4) at an urban ED. The proportion of pediatric ED visits for abdominal pain that resulted in an identified delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was 0.1% (141/120,112). All but four sites had fewer than 10 cases of delayed diagnosis across the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study of 120,000+ ED visits for pediatric abdominal pain, we found that the ratio of visits with cross-sectional imaging to diagnosed cases of appendicitis varied widely across EDs. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was uncommon. Adherence to best practices and improved imaging quality may hold promise to improve diagnostic stewardship for children with abdominal pain across EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic stewardship is the effort to optimize diagnostic testing to reduce errors while avoiding overtesting and overtreatment. Abdominal pain and appendicitis in children are essential use cases. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis can be dangerous and even life-threatening, but overtesting is harmful.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 5-17 years presenting with abdominal pain to 26 EDs within the Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative (MEDIC) from May 1, 2016, to February 29, 2024. We defined two outcome measures summarized by ED. First, we describe the cross-sectional imaging:appendicitis visits ratio, defined as the count of ED visits resulting in any cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) divided by the count of ED visits with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Second, we describe the delayed diagnosis rate, defined by an ED visit for abdominal pain resulting in a discharge and subsequent return visit with a diagnosis of appendicitis within 7 days.

Results: The sample included 120,112 pediatric visits for abdominal pain at 26 EDs; 4967 (4.1%) were diagnosed with appendicitis. The cross-sectional imaging:appendicitis visits ratio varied by site, from as low as 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.2) at a pediatric site to as high as 7.9 (95% CI 4.8-16.4) at an urban ED. The proportion of pediatric ED visits for abdominal pain that resulted in an identified delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was 0.1% (141/120,112). All but four sites had fewer than 10 cases of delayed diagnosis across the study period.

Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study of 120,000+ ED visits for pediatric abdominal pain, we found that the ratio of visits with cross-sectional imaging to diagnosed cases of appendicitis varied widely across EDs. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis was uncommon. Adherence to best practices and improved imaging quality may hold promise to improve diagnostic stewardship for children with abdominal pain across EDs.

探索诊断管理在急诊科评估儿科腹痛在全国范围内的质量协作。
背景:诊断管理是指努力优化诊断检测,以减少错误,同时避免过度检测和过度治疗。儿童腹痛和阑尾炎是基本病例。阑尾炎的延迟诊断可能很危险,甚至危及生命,但过度检查则有害无益:我们对 2016 年 5 月 1 日至 2024 年 2 月 29 日期间在密歇根州急诊科改进合作组织 (MEDIC) 的 26 家急诊科就诊的 5-17 岁腹痛儿童进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们定义了两个按急诊科汇总的结果指标。首先,我们描述了横断面成像:阑尾炎就诊比,即进行任何横断面成像(CT 或 MRI)的急诊就诊人数除以诊断为阑尾炎的急诊就诊人数。其次,我们描述了延迟诊断率,其定义是因腹痛而出院的急诊就诊者和随后在 7 天内诊断为阑尾炎的复诊者:样本包括26家急诊室的120112名因腹痛就诊的儿童,其中4967人(4.1%)被诊断为阑尾炎。横断面成像与阑尾炎就诊率因就诊地点而异,儿科就诊率低至0.2(95%置信区间[CI] 0.1-0.2),城市急诊室则高达7.9(95% CI 4.8-16.4)。儿科急诊室因腹痛而导致阑尾炎延迟诊断的比例为 0.1%(141/120,112)。在整个研究期间,除四家医院外,其他所有医院的延误诊断病例均少于 10 例:在这项对 120,000 多例因小儿腹痛而就诊的急诊室进行的回顾性队列研究中,我们发现各急诊室的阑尾炎横断面成像与确诊病例的比例差异很大。阑尾炎的延迟诊断并不常见。坚持最佳实践和提高成像质量有望改善各急诊室对腹痛患儿的诊断管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信