An untargeted metabolomics approach to evaluate enzymatically deconjugated steroids and intact steroid conjugates in urine as diagnostic biomarkers for adrenal tumors.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Nora Vogg, Eleanor North, Arne Gessner, Felix Fels, Markus R Heinrich, Matthias Kroiss, Max Kurlbaum, Martin Fassnacht, Martin F Fromm
{"title":"An untargeted metabolomics approach to evaluate enzymatically deconjugated steroids and intact steroid conjugates in urine as diagnostic biomarkers for adrenal tumors.","authors":"Nora Vogg, Eleanor North, Arne Gessner, Felix Fels, Markus R Heinrich, Matthias Kroiss, Max Kurlbaum, Martin Fassnacht, Martin F Fromm","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Urinary steroid profiling after hydrolysis of conjugates is an emerging tool to differentiate aggressive adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) from benign adrenocortical adenomas (ACA). However, the shortcomings of deconjugation are the lack of standardized and fully validated hydrolysis protocols and the loss of information about the originally conjugated form of the steroids. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the deconjugation process and investigate novel diagnostic biomarkers in urine without enzymatic hydrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>24 h urine samples from 40 patients with ACC and 40 patients with ACA were analyzed by untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry both unmodified and after hydrolysis with arylsulfatase/glucuronidase from <i>Helix pomatia.</i> Both approaches were compared regarding the differentiation of ACC vs. ACA via ROC analyses and to evaluate the hydrolyzation efficiency of steroid conjugates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Steroid glucuronides were fully deconjugated, while some disulfates and all monosulfates were still largely detectable after enzymatic hydrolysis, suggesting incomplete and variable deconjugation. In unhydrolyzed urine, steroid monosulfates showed the best differentiation between ACC and ACA (highest AUC=0.983 for C<sub>21</sub>H<sub>32</sub>O<sub>6</sub>S, followed by its isomer and two isomers with the molecular formula C<sub>21</sub>H<sub>32</sub>O<sub>7</sub>S). Moreover, several disulfates were highly abundant and increased in ACC compared to ACA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work highlights the limitations of hydrolyzing steroid conjugates before analysis and shows a possible superiority of a direct analysis approach compared to a hydrolysis approach from a methodological point of view and regarding diagnostic accuracy. Several steroid conjugates were found as promising diagnostic biomarkers for differentiation between ACC and ACA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Urinary steroid profiling after hydrolysis of conjugates is an emerging tool to differentiate aggressive adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) from benign adrenocortical adenomas (ACA). However, the shortcomings of deconjugation are the lack of standardized and fully validated hydrolysis protocols and the loss of information about the originally conjugated form of the steroids. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the deconjugation process and investigate novel diagnostic biomarkers in urine without enzymatic hydrolysis.

Methods: 24 h urine samples from 40 patients with ACC and 40 patients with ACA were analyzed by untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry both unmodified and after hydrolysis with arylsulfatase/glucuronidase from Helix pomatia. Both approaches were compared regarding the differentiation of ACC vs. ACA via ROC analyses and to evaluate the hydrolyzation efficiency of steroid conjugates.

Results: Steroid glucuronides were fully deconjugated, while some disulfates and all monosulfates were still largely detectable after enzymatic hydrolysis, suggesting incomplete and variable deconjugation. In unhydrolyzed urine, steroid monosulfates showed the best differentiation between ACC and ACA (highest AUC=0.983 for C21H32O6S, followed by its isomer and two isomers with the molecular formula C21H32O7S). Moreover, several disulfates were highly abundant and increased in ACC compared to ACA.

Conclusions: This work highlights the limitations of hydrolyzing steroid conjugates before analysis and shows a possible superiority of a direct analysis approach compared to a hydrolysis approach from a methodological point of view and regarding diagnostic accuracy. Several steroid conjugates were found as promising diagnostic biomarkers for differentiation between ACC and ACA.

一种非靶向代谢组学方法来评估尿液中酶解类固醇和完整类固醇偶联物作为肾上腺肿瘤的诊断生物标志物。
目的:结合物水解后的尿类固醇谱分析是一种新兴的区分侵袭性肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)和良性肾上腺皮质腺瘤(ACA)的工具。然而,解偶联的缺点是缺乏标准化和充分验证的水解方案,以及关于类固醇最初缀合形式的信息丢失。本研究旨在评估解结过程的质量,并研究无酶解尿液中的新型诊断生物标志物。方法:采用液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法,对40例ACC患者和40例ACA患者的24份 h尿液样本进行非靶向代谢组学分析,这些样本均未经修饰,并经螺旋鱼的芳基硫酸酯酶/葡萄糖醛酸酶水解。通过ROC分析比较两种方法对ACC和ACA的差异,并评估类固醇偶联物的水解效率。结果:甾类糖醛酸酯被完全解偶,而部分二硫酸盐和所有单硫酸盐在酶解后仍大量检测到,提示解偶不完全和可变。在未水解的尿液中,类固醇单硫酸盐对ACC和ACA的区分效果最好(C21H32O6S的AUC最高=0.983,其次是其异构体和两个分子式为C21H32O7S的异构体)。此外,与ACA相比,ACC中几种二磺酸盐含量丰富且增加。结论:这项工作强调了分析前水解类固醇偶联物的局限性,从方法学的角度和诊断准确性来看,与水解方法相比,直接分析方法可能具有优势。发现了几种类固醇偶联物作为ACC和ACA之间分化的有希望的诊断生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信