Bereaved parent involvement in co-designed stillbirth research: Experiences of Project Engage

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kirstin Tindal , Danielle Pollock , Brad Farrant , Nicky Robinson , Yumi Oba , Ashley Pade , Jassy Moore , Siobhan Loughnan , Vicky Flenady , Christine Andrews
{"title":"Bereaved parent involvement in co-designed stillbirth research: Experiences of Project Engage","authors":"Kirstin Tindal ,&nbsp;Danielle Pollock ,&nbsp;Brad Farrant ,&nbsp;Nicky Robinson ,&nbsp;Yumi Oba ,&nbsp;Ashley Pade ,&nbsp;Jassy Moore ,&nbsp;Siobhan Loughnan ,&nbsp;Vicky Flenady ,&nbsp;Christine Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of ‘<em>Project Engage’</em> involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents’ involvement in research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of <em>Project Engage,</em> between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The project team co-designed and published ‘<em>Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents</em>’. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams’ success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers co-designing stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of ‘Project Engage’ involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents’ involvement in research.

Methods

This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of Project Engage, between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research.

Findings

The project team co-designed and published ‘Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents’. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes.

Conclusion

The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams’ success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers co-designing stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.
失去亲人的父母参与共同设计的死产研究:参与项目的经验。
背景:虽然让消费者参与研究的好处是众所周知的,但失去亲人的父母面临着独特的挑战,并且缺乏对他们在共同设计的死产研究中的经验的描述。“参与项目”的集体经验包括共同设计资源,以支持失去亲人的父母参与研究。方法:本研究旨在描述和评估作为死产研究项目的共同调查者的丧偶父母的参与。采用描述性和探索性方法描述了2021年至2023年期间的“参与项目”过程,在这个过程中,失去亲人的父母参与了各个方面。通过反复回顾和反思来进行评估,以检查共同设计死胎研究的障碍和促进因素。研究结果:项目组共同设计并出版了《参与死产研究:丧亲父母指南》。七名共同研究人员完成了项目的最后阶段评估,其中包括五名失去亲人的父母和两名没有死产经历的研究人员。大多数共同调查人员认为他们的贡献受到高度重视,项目产出符合他们的期望。协同设计的促成因素包括清晰的沟通、共同的目标、支持性的团队、相关的产出以及团队中有实际经验的研究人员。障碍包括研究术语、满足后勤、支持和保持参与、角色期望和机构治理过程。结论:家长和研究人员都认为共同设计经验是积极的,并确定了许多促进团队成功的关键因素。评估丧失亲人的父母和研究者共同设计死产研究的经验是至关重要的。这里概述的过程和建议将指导未来参与死产研究的丧失亲人的父母的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信